Floaters are a common ocular condition which form as a consequence of aging changes in the vitreous. Although in most patients the symptoms are minimal, they can cause significant impairment in vision-related quality of life in a small population of patients. Recently there has been an increase in awareness of the visual disability caused by floaters, and the evidence-base for treatment of this condition using small-gauge vitrectomy has increased. In this review, we define the term 'floaters' as symptomatic vitreous opacities (SVO). We suggest a classification dependent on the presence or absence of posterior vitreous detachment and discuss their pathogenesis and natural history. We review their impact on patients' quality of life related to visual function. We review the psychological factors that may have a role in some patients who appear to be affected by SVO to the extent that they pursue all options including surgery with all its attendant risks. We summarise the available evidence-base of treatment options available for SVO with special emphasis on the safety and efficacy of vitrectomy for this condition.
Introduction: The UK Government imposed a COVID19 lockdown (LD) restricting all but essential activities from 24th March 2020. Subsequently, there has been a significant reduction in casualty attendances nationwide including for ophthalmic emergencies. We aim to study the presentation of rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (RRD) and significant vitreous haemorrhage caused by posterior vitreous detachment (PVD-VH) in three tertiary centres covering most of the North West of England in the 6 weeks before and during the lockdown. Methods: A retrospective multicenter non-randomised consecutive case series study was designed to collect information on all cases of RRD and PVD-VH requiring surgery presenting to the vitreoretinal departments of Manchester Royal Eye Hospital, East Lancashire NHS Foundation Trust and the Lancashire NHS Foundation Trust from 11th February to 4th May 2020. Results: A total of 137 eyes of 137 patients were identified between the three centres of which 132 eyes were operated for RRD. Of these, 86 (64.7%) were operated pre-LD compared with 46 eyes (34.8%) during LD. Forty-five out of 86 eyes (52.3%) were macula-off pre-LD compared with 31 out of 46 eyes (67.3%) during LD ( p = 0.06). There was lower proportion of non-PVD related RRD during LD (11 pre-LD to 1 during LD, p = 0.05). PVR was present in four cases during LD compared to 2 before ( p = 0.19). Conclusion: There was a clinically significant reduction in the overall incidence of RRD in our centres with an increase in the proportion of macula-off and proliferative vitreoretinopathy during the LD period compared to a similar period before.
The aim of this investigation was to study the effect of the doping steroid nandrolone on metamizol and morphine-induced analgesia and tolerance/dependence in rats. Nandrolone per se did not change the basal nociceptive thresholds in both sexes. It diminished the analgesic effect of metamizol in females, revealed by tail flick test, and males, revealed by paw pressure and hot plate tests. In general, the action of nandrolone was to decrease the morphine-induced analgesia in female and male rats. This was strongly manifested by paw pressure and tail flick tests in male, and tail flick tests in female animals. Nandrolone slowed the development of opioid tolerance/dependence. It aggravated the withdrawal syndrome in the females and invigorated aggression in the males. The data provide evidence that anabolic steroid nandrolone might decrease the analgesic action of metamizol or morphine. The doping steroid could modulate opioid tolerance/dependence and the aggressive behavior in a gender dependent manner. The action of nandrolone is most likely due to profound long-term effects on the central nervous system and might be a gateway to addiction of other drugs of abuse.
Purpose: Patients with Stickler syndrome are at high risk of giant retinal tears (GRTs) and detachments. Vitreoretinal interventions can reduce this risk, but there is presently no consensus about the optimal prophylactic approach. The aim of our study was to determine whether 360°laser prophylaxis is a safe and effective procedure to prevent GRT detachments in patients with Stickler syndrome.Methods: Study subjects were recruited retrospectively through the databases of the vitreoretinal and ophthalmic genetic tertiary services in Manchester, United Kingdom. Clinical data were collected including on prophylactic intervention, the occurrence of retinal detachment, and the presence/type of retinal breaks.Results: One hundred thirteen eyes from 63 patients with Stickler syndrome were studied; 72.6% (82/113) of these eyes received 360°laser prophylaxis. Of these, 9% had a retinal detachment, but no GRTs occurred. Among the 27.4% (31/113) of eyes that had no prophylactic treatment, 23% suffered a retinal detachment and 42.9% of these were associated with a GRT.Conclusion: Patients who underwent laser prophylaxis had fewer retinal detachments and no GRTs during an average of 6.1 years of follow-up (median 5 years), suggesting that this is a safe and effective approach for individuals with Stickler syndrome.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.