Uncontrolled studies have suggested a beneficial effect of periodontal treatment on metabolic control of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM). We therefore conducted controlled single-blind studies, using current metabolic status indicators in IDDM subjects free of significant complications other than periodontal diseases. In the 1st study, 41 IDDM subjects with gingivitis and early periodontitis were randomly assigned to treatment (oral hygiene and scaling) or control groups. The study was completed by 16 experimental and 15 control subjects. Reassessment after 2 months showed a Hawthorne effect in the control group, and no difference between groups. However, further analysis showed a relationship between individual metabolic control variation and gingival inflammation. A 2nd study enrolled 23 IDDM subjects with advanced periodontitis, who were randomised to treatment (full initial therapy including root planning) or control groups. Only 1 subject failed to complete the study, owing to illness. In this study, a significant response to periodontal treatment was not accompanied by any improvement in metabolic control. These results support the concept that the effect of metabolic control may be predominant in the relationship between IDDM and periodontal health.

This study examined the relationship between psychological mood, stress and oral hygiene behaviour in a group of 51 regular dental attenders. Subjects brought a saliva sample for cortisol radioimmunoassay. completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) Scale, were assessed for plaque and gingivitis, and were then instructed in toothbrushing. 5 weeks later. 47 subjects were given a full repeat examination. There was a slight reduction in plaque and gingivitis scores, but no change in mood as assessed by HAD Scale and salivary cortisol concentration. Mean anxiety scores were associated with gingivitis level, and mean depression scores with plaque. Neither mood nor cortisol were predictors of subsequent change in plaque or gingivitis.

There is presently no satisfactory method of detecting periodontal disease activity at a specified site by means of clinical measurements. This study was designed to examine the possible sources of error with regard to probing measurement reliability. Intra-examiner reproducibility of probing measurements was studied at 766 sites in 10 patients with untreated periodontitis, using a 0.25 N hinged constant force probe (a) with a stent for guidance and landmark, and (b) without stent. The stent made little difference to overall reproducibility of probing depths, though it appeared to reduce variation in different areas. Repeated probing led to an increase in some measurements, perhaps by an effect on tissues. Reproducibility of probing depth was lower in deep pockets, and about 2% of all probing depth scores varied by 3 mm or more at the same site. 4 possible sources of measurement error were noted: visual and tactile observational error, positional error and tissue change. The results are discussed in relation to the clinical detection of periodontal disease activity.

Clinical probing depth at molar sites exaggerates pocket depth, but the probe tip may be closer to the actual attachment level in smokers due to less penetration of tissue. This may be partly explained by the reduced inflammation and width of supra-bony connective tissue in smokers. These findings have clinical relevance to the successful management of periodontal patients who smoke.

Topical locally delivered minocycline is an adjunctive to non-surgical periodontal treatment, but there are few reported trials. Previous trials have reported differences between changes in probing depth in treatment and control groups, but no differences in probing attachment level. In the present study, 30 subjects were paired according to gender, age, ethnic group, smoking habits, and probing depths. Both groups received intensive oral hygiene education and root planing with local anaesthesia. Active or placebo gel was placed subgingivally at planed sites in each subject according to a double-blind protocol, immediately after instrumentation, and 2 and 4 weeks later. A periodontal examination was made with a constant force probe before instrumentation, and 6 and 12 weeks later, 2 subjects failed to complete the study, and their pairs were therefore not included in the analysis. Results were tested with analysis of covariance. Differences between groups in mean probing depth did not reach statistical significance at any visit (baseline: test (T) = 5.93 mm, control (C) = 5.74 mm; 6 weeks: T = 3.53 mm, C = 3.63 mm; 12 weeks: T = 3.29 mm, C = 3.44 mm), but mean probing attachment levels were different (p < 0.05) at both reassessments (baseline: T = 6.86 mm, C = 6.83 mm; 6 weeks: T = 4.93 mm, C = 5.30 mm; 12 weeks T = 4.91 mm, C = 5.27 mm). There was also a difference in the number of sites with bleeding on deep probing at 12 weeks (p < 0.05). This trial showed that adjunctive minocycline gel provided a more advantageous outcome for nonsurgical periodontal treatment in terms of probing attachment level and bleeding on deep probing. This trial was a good example of experimental, as opposed to community, design, and used limited resources to show a clear result.