A commitment to an integrative, non-reductionist clinical and theoretical perspective in medicine that honors the importance of all relevant domains of knowledge, not just “the biological,” is clearly evident in Engel’s original writings on the biopsychosocial model. And though this model’s influence on modern psychiatry (in clinical as well as educational settings) has been significant, a growing body of recent literature is critical of it – charging it with lacking philosophical coherence, insensitivity to patients’ subjective experience, being unfaithful to the general systems theory that Engel claimed it be rooted in, and engendering an undisciplined eclecticism that provides no safeguards against either the dominance or the under-representation of any one of the three domains of bio, psycho, or social.

SUMMARYDepression is an illness that kills. The links between depression and medical illness are well established and bi-directional, but evidence is mounting that depression increases mortality as well as morbidity in adults, particularly older adults. We examine the evidence that the increase in mortality in depression applies to all-cause mortality as well as cardiac mortality, and describe plausible physiological theories for the association. We conclude that excess mortality arising from depression is a major public health problem that is largely unrecognised and needs to be addressed by a range of clinicians.

•psnuijuoDsip SBMsuidEzop sqj pUE SpEUI SEM SIJ|[OSA|E 3)3jS||E 3ISUIJJX3 jo s;sou8Eip y 'I13M X|3uisijdjns psjEsd-dB 111.nini 3qj 'sSuipUIJ UOIJEUIUJEX3 pUE |E3l8o|OIpEJ p33UEApE 3qj 3Jlds3Q \JOpIJJS, JO 43Z33qM, p.nrjiMiom.ip ou SEM 3J3qj_ •psjou 3J3M uiqjXqj do[|E3 E puE sjnsssjd SnOUSA p3JEA3|3 UÈ'X||E3|U|p 'UOIJDE3J p33npui-8njp E JO SOUEJEsddE 3qj '.¡III \l'l| 'S6-/.6 'Ã-rt 'JLD3 3MJ)°uoijdnjjajuj oj pa| SUOlJEDIjdujOS JE|nDSEAO|pJE3 3J3qM '(X33) XdEJ3qj 3AIS|nAUO3OJJD3|a pUE aU|XEJE|U3A u3Ai8 juaijEd E)o asea aqj aquosap a^:j¡s JL33 OUIXfjl'|UOA

Enfant terrible of psychiatry and widely known as one of its most indefatigable as well as iconoclastic critics, Thomas Szasz (1961–2012) had a prolific writing career that extended some 51 years beyond the publication of his first book, The Myth of Mental Illness, in 1961. This editorial identifies and critically discusses three major themes in Szasz's writings: his contention that there is no such thing as mental illness, his contention that individual responsibility is never compromised in those suffering from what is generally considered as mental illness, and his perennial interest in calling attention to the political nature of psychiatric diagnosis.

No abstract