To evaluate the implantable collamer lens (ICL)-sizing method using the partial regression coefficient of the implanted ICL size to review the conventional horizontal compression coefficient and match the results of clinical observation.

Purpose To predict the anterior chamber volume (ACV) after implantable collamer lens (ICL) implantation based on ICL size and parameters of anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). Design Retrospective study. Methods This study included 222 eyes of 222 patients who underwent ICL implantation at Nagoya Eye Clinic. The patients were divided into two groups: prediction group, for creating the prediction equation (148 eyes, mean age: 32.11 ± 8.04 years), and verification group, for verifying the equation (74 eyes, mean age: 33.03 ± 6.74 years). The angle opening distance (AOD), anterior chamber width (ACW), ACV, anterior chamber depth, lens vault, angle-to-angle distance, angle recess area, and trabecular iris space area were calculated using AS-OCT. A stepwise multiple regression analysis was performed. After the creation of the prediction equation, its accuracy was verified in the verification group. Results The ACV, AOD750, ACW, and ICL size were selected as explanatory variables to predict postoperative ACV. Mean predicted (114.2 ± 21.83 mm3) and actual postoperative ACVs (116.1 ± 25.41 mm3) were not significantly different (P = 0.269); absolute error was 10.59 ± 9.13 mm3. In addition, there was high correlation between actual and predictive ACV (adjusted R2 = 0.6996, p < 0.0001). Bland-Altman plot revealed that there was no addition or proportional error between predicted and actual postoperative ACV. Conclusion Postoperative ACV was accurately predicted using AS-OCT parameters and ICL size. This prediction equation may be useful for making decisions regarding ICL size.

Purpose: This study aimed to predict the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) based on swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) parameters in eyes with keratoconus. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 135 eyes of 135 patients with keratoconus (mean age: 31.9 ± 12.4 years). The average keratometry value and BCVA (logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution [Snellen]) were 48.68 ± 5.44 diopter and 0.20 ± 0.36 (20/25), respectively. Eleven parameters were calculated using SS-OCT. Apart from the corneal height and elevation, all the other parameters were calculated from both anterior and posterior corneal OCT data. The patients were divided into 2 groups, 1 for creating the prediction equation (prediction group, 86 eyes) and another for verifying the equation (verification group, 49 eyes). In the former, individual correlations between the BCVA and SS-OCT parameters were analyzed. A stepwise multiple regression analysis was performed with the BCVA as a dependent variable and SS-OCT parameters as independent variables. After its creation, the accuracy of the prediction equation was verified in the verification group. Results: All the parameters, except for age and total corneal cylinder, showed statistically significant correlations with BCVA (P < 0.0001). Using the stepwise multiple regression analysis, we selected 2 explanatory variables: root mean square of anterior corneal elevation (standardized regression coefficient: 1.221; P < 0.0001) and total coma aberration (standardized regression coefficient: −0.575; P = 0.001; adjusted R2 = 0.546). The prediction was correct in 84.6% of the eyes within ±1 line of Snellen BCVA. Conclusions: Using the equation we derived from SS-OCT parameters is a promising method to predict visual function in patients with keratoconus.

To create an equation for predicting the trabecular iris angle (TIA) and to verify its accuracy after implantable collamer lens (ICL) implantation.

Introduction: Although biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure (bIOP) is available, the effectiveness of intraocular pressure (IOP) correction in keratoconus and forme fruste keratoconus (FFK) eyes has not been investigated. Objective: Evaluation of bIOP measurements in eyes with keratoconus and FFK. Methods: Forty-two eyes in 21 patients with keratoconus in one eye and FFK in the fellow eye were examined (KC/FFK group; mean age 24.62 ± 8.6 years; 16 males and 5 females). The control group consisted of 62 eyes in 31 unaffected subjects (mean age 26.26 ± 3.64 years; 15 males and 16 females). The bIOP was determined using a Scheimpflug-based tonometer (Corvis Scheimpflug Technology [Corvis ST®]) after measuring the IOP with a conventional non-contact tonometer (NIOP). The agreement between NIOP and bIOP values was examined using the Bland-Altman plot. The difference between NIOP and bIOP (bIOP correction amount) was compared between keratoconus and FFK eyes. Results: In the control group, there were no significant differences between right and left eyes in both NIOP and bIOP values (p = 0.975 and p = 0.224, respectively). In the KC/FFK group, NIOP values were significantly lower in the keratoconus eyes (9.93 ± 1.96 mm Hg) than in the FFK eyes (12.23 ± 3.03 mm Hg; p = 0.0003). There was no significant difference in bIOP values between the right and left eyes of the KC/FFK group (p = 0.168). The bIOP correction amount was significantly increased in keratoconus eyes (3.58 ± 2.12 mm Hg) compared to in FFK eyes (1.80 ± 3.32 mm Hg; p = 0.011). Conclusions: For eyes with keratoconus and FFK, the bIOP method is effective to adjust IOP measurements based on corneal biomechanical properties.

PurposeThis retrospective case-matched study aimed to compare visual and refractive outcomes between small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and LASIK.Patients and methodsPatients who underwent SMILE (34 eyes of 23 patients) or LASIK (34 eyes of 24 patients) were enrolled and matched according to preoperative manifest refractive spherical equivalents. The mean preoperative manifest refractive spherical equivalent was −4.69±0.6 and −4.67±0.64 D in the SMILE and LASIK groups, respectively. The safety, efficacy, and predictability were compared 3 months after surgery. Changes in corneal refractive power from the center to peripheral points and their maintenance ratios were analyzed and compared between the two groups.ResultsIn the SMILE and LASIK groups, 82.4% and 85.3% of patients, respectively, achieved 20/13 or better uncorrected distance visual acuity (p=1.00). There were no eyes that lost two or more lines of corrected distance visual acuity in either group. The maintenance ratios of corneal refractive power changes at the peripheral points in the SMILE group were significantly higher than those in the LASIK group (p<0.05).ConclusionBoth groups achieved similar high efficacy and safety. SMILE surgery resulted in higher refractive power correction in the peripheral cornea than LASIK surgery.

No abstract

Purpose: To compare the changes in corneal biomechanical properties and corneal tomography between transepithelial customized corneal crosslinking (C-CXL) and epithelium-off accelerated corneal crosslinking (A-CXL) in eyes with keratoconus.Methods: Twenty eyes in 20 consecutive patients who underwent C-CXL (C-CXL group) and 20 eyes in 20 patients who underwent A-CXL (A-CXL group) were included in this retrospective comparative study. The corneal biomechanical properties were analyzed using a Scheimpflug-based tonometer, and all corneas were examined by anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) before and 3 months after surgery. The corneal biomechanical parameters analyzed were the maximum inverse radius, deformation amplitude (DA) ratio max (2 mm), stiffness parameter at applanation 1, and integrated radius. The AS-OCT parameters analyzed included average keratometry, corneal astigmatism, maximum keratometry reading (Kmax), higher-order irregularity, and asymmetry.Results: In the C-CXL group, there were significant improvements in biomechanical parameters, including the maximum inverse radius, the DA ratio max (2 mm), and the integrated radius after surgery (P = 0.037, P = 0.002, and P = 0.003, respectively). In the C-CXL group, there was a significant decrease in the Kmax, higher-order irregularity, and asymmetry components (P = 0.014, P = 0.008, and P = 0.016, respectively). The biomechanical properties and AS-OCT parameters did not change significantly in the A-CXL group after surgery. According to multiple regression analyses, C-CXL had a greater effect than A-CXL in improving the maximum inverse radius, DA ratio max (2 mm), integrated radius, Kmax, asymmetry component, and higher-order irregularity component.Conclusions: C-CXL might improve the biomechanical properties and irregular shape of the cornea from the early postoperative period to a greater extent than A-CXL.