The use of nematicides with reduced toxic side-effects against non-target free-living nematodes is a favorable option for farmers to control plant-parasitic nematodes. The nematicide fluensulfone was registered in several countries for the control of the root-knot nematodes, Meloidogyne spp. among other plant-parasitic nematodes. This study aimed to evaluate the nematicidal activity of fluensulfone against non-target nematode fauna in four field experiments, each under different conditions (soils types and plant hosts). Nematodes extracted from soil samples were classified and counted based on their morphological characters. Fluensulfone significantly reduced damage caused by root-knot nematodes to tomato and sweet potato plants, while overall non-target free-living nematode population densities were maintained at the same level as those in control. Different diversity indices (e.g., Shannon-Wiener H’, Simpson’s D, species richness, evenness J’, maturity indices) and principal component analyses in the four experiments showed that fluensulfone treatment kept a similar diversity level of non-target free-living nematode fauna to that of the non-treated control. The results suggested that fluensulfone may have minimal impact to free-living nematode fauna in both population density and diversity when the nematicide was applied to control Meloidogyne spp.
loss observed around the globe, including reductions of -% in Australia, -% in Brazil, and more than % in South Africa in plant and ratoon crops. As indicated by Blair and Stirling ( ), many of previous nematode studies in sugarcane fields were in sandy soil, in which Meloidogyne may be the most important plant-parasitic nematode species (PPN). Bull ( and ) reported a yield decline of % in plant crop and -% or more in the ratoon crop in a sandy sugarcane field infested with Pratylenchus. Bond et al. ( ) reported that in sandy soil sugarcane fields w it h Tyle nchorhynchu s, Me socr icone ma a n d Pratylenchus, in Louisiana, USA, -% of yield decline was observed in both plant and ratoon crops. Furthermore, Cadet and Spaull ( ) showed a % yield increase by a nematicide application against Meloidogyne and Pratylenchus, and yields in the ratoon crop were correlated with those in the plant crop in sandy soil in South Africa.Yet, studies for nematode and sugarcane in clay soil have been limited. Dropkin ( ) reported that the Many field experiments have revealed sugarcane yield loss due to plant-parasitic nematodes, especially in sandy soil, but limited in clay soil. We previously reported a % sugarcane yield reduction in the plant crop in a heavy clay soil due to lesion nematodes suppressing the number of sugarcane tillers in the early growth stage (Kawanobe et al., ). Yet, it is unknown whether such early growth inhibition in plant canes will affect the ratoon crop yield in clay soil. The objective of this study was to examine the carry-over effect of yield decline from the plant crop to the ratoon crop in a field with high clay content (> %), in which early growth inhibition, possibly due to lesion nematodes, was observed in a plant crop of sugarcane. Though the Pratylenchus population density remained unchanged among treatments (fosthiazate-treated, kg and . kg/ ha at spring planting, and non-treated control), after months (July) from the spring planting until the harvest of the ratoon crop, our study showed a -% higher yield of the ratoon crop in the fosthiazate-treated crop than in the non-treated control. The result in the plant crop carried over to the ratoon crop, and implied that the healthier root growth of the plant canes achieved by a one-time nematicide application would carry-over to the ratoon crop. The result also suggested that the number of tillers and cane length observed at months (July) in the ratoon crop might adequately reflect nematode damage and offer a good explanation for the level of the ratoon crop yield. Nematol. Res. ( ), -. ( )
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.