In cleft lip and palate patients with a germ of the lateral incisor, it is beneficial to carry out secondary bone grafting to the alveolar cleft at the age of 5 to 7 years, preceding eruption of the canine, in order to form a good bone bridge that will facilitate eruption of the lateral incisor and subsequent normal dentition and occlusion.

The objective of this study was to compare the rate of implant stability development of as-received and photofunctionalized dental implants in regular and complex cases. Materials and Methods: Forty-nine implants (24 as-received and 25 photofunctionalized) placed in regular or complex cases (simultaneous guided bone regeneration, sinus elevation, or fresh extraction sockets) were studied. Photofunctionalization was performed by ultraviolet (UV) treatment of implants for 15 minutes using a photo device immediately prior to placement, and the generation of superhydrophilicity was confirmed. Implant stability was evaluated by measuring the implant stability quotient (ISQ) at placement (ISQ1) and at stage-two surgery (ISQ2). The rate of implant stability development was evaluated by calculating the osseointegration speed index (OSI), defined as the ISQ increase per month ([ISQ2-ISQ1]/healing time in months). The percentage of innate bone support at placement was evaluated clinically and radiographically. Results: The average OSI was considerably greater for photofunctionalized implants (3.7 ± 2.9) than for as-received implants (0.0 ± 1.0). The OSI in complex cases was 4.2 ± 3.2 for photofunctionalized implants and 0.2 ± 0.9 for as-received implants. The OSI in cases with simultaneous sinus elevation was 5.5 ± 3.5 for photofunctionalized implants and 0.2 ± 1.1 for as-received implants. Photofunctionalized implants showed significantly higher ISQ2 values than as-received implants. Photofunctionalized implant ISQ2 values were greater than 60, regardless of primary stability and innate bone support at placement. In multivariate analysis including the effects of photofunctionalization, age and sex of patients, and diameter and length of implants, photofunctionalization showed the strongest influence on the OSI for both regular and complex cases, while other factors influenced the OSI only in certain conditions. Conclusion: Photofunctionalization accelerated the rate and enhanced the final level of implant stability development compared with as-received implants, particularly for implants placed into poor-quality bone and other complex cases. Photofunctionalization was a stronger determinant of implant stability than all the other tested implant-and host-related factors.

This assignment applies to all translations of the Work as well as to preliminary display/posting of the abstract of the accepted article in electronic form before publication. If any changes in authorship (order, deletions, or additions) occur after the manuscript is submitted, agreement by all authors for such changes must be on file with the Publisher. An author's name may be removed only at his/her written request. (Note: Material prepared by employees of the US government in the course of their official duties cannot be copyrighted.

Among various patient-, surgical protocol-, and implant-related factors, the absence of postoperative wound breakdown and use of photofunctionalization significantly reduced the risk of early implant failure. It was notable that photofunctionalization, a unique, chairside measure to improve implant surfaces, was effective exclusively among implant-related factors.

β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP) was grafted into rat mandibular bone defects to assess its potential as a scaffold material for bone regeneration. For this purpose, β-TCP (TCP), allogenic bone (Allograft), and allogenic bone combined with β-TCP (Combined) were employed as graft materials. To the left side of the graft materials in the bone defects, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) was added. The rats were sacrificed at one, three, and five weeks. Bone formation rate (BFR), remaining β-TCP rate (RTR), β-TCP absorption rate (TAR), whole amount of β-TCP (WTCP), and total rate of BFR and RTR (TBR) were measured. Combined showed equivalent BFR to Allograft at five weeks, and showed higher RTR at one week and higher BFR at five weeks than TCP. Combined with PRP showed higher TAR than that without PRP at three weeks. Therefore, combination with allogenic bone showed reduced β-TCP absorption, hence enhancing the role of β-TCP in bone regeneration. These findings suggested that β-TCP is a better scaffold for bone regeneration if its early absorption is reduced when used in combination with an osteogenic material.