The ostrich (Struthio camelus) is a herbivorous bird and although the hindgut is known as the site for fiber digestion, little is known about the microbial diversity in the ostrich hindgut. Our aim was to analyze the microbial diversity in ostrich ceca using a 16S ribosomal RNA gene (rDNA) clone library approach. A total of 310 clones were sequenced and phylogenetically analyzed and were classified into 110 operational taxonomy units (OTUs) based on a 98% similarity criterion. The similarity of the sequences ranged from 86 to 99% and 95 OTUs had less than 98% similarity to the sequences in the public databases. Coverage and the Shannon-Wiener index (H') of the library were 83.9% and 4.29, respectively. The sequences were assigned to the following 6 phyla: Firmicutes (50.9% of the total number of sequences), Bacteroidetes (39.4%), Fibrobacteres (6.5%), Euryarchaeota (1.9%), Spirochaetes (1.0%), and Verrucomicrobia (0.3%); approximately 90% of the sequences were affiliated with Firmicutes and Bacteroidetes. The only OTU of Fibrobacteres (OTU 107), had 93 and 90% similarity to Fibrobacter succinogenes and F. intestinalis, respectively, suggesting a new species of Fibrobacter in ostrich ceca. Clostridium coccoides and C. leptum formed major groups within the Firmicutes. There was no OTU with high similarity (> or =98%) to the 16S rDNA of cultivated fibrolytic bacteria in our library. Although two OTUs were affiliated with Euryarchaeota, no sequence was affiliated with methanogenic Archaea. This study presents the very complex ostrich cecal microbial community, in which the majority of the bacterial species have not yet been cultivated.

This study was conducted to determine and compare the live traits, carcass yield and the physical, chemical, processing and sensory properties of meat from 20 Brahman grade cattle (crossbred cattle) and crossbred water buffalo (Philippine carabao × Murrah, Bulgarian or Indian) with an average age and weight of 29 months and 434 kg, respectively. The animals were fed a similar diet for 180 days before slaughter. A survey was performed to establish consumer meat preference between the two species. Live weights before slaughter of the two species were found to be different (P < 0.05) with the crossbred water buffalo showing higher bodyweight. However, the crossbred water buffalo had a lower (P < 0.05) dressing yield based on hot carcass weight and chilled carcass weight. The lower dressing yield of crossbred water buffalo can be attributed to its higher (P < 0.05) weights of edible and non‐edible slaughter by‐products. The chilled carcass yield of the forequarters and hindquarters from crossbred cattle and crossbred water buffalo were comparable when expressed as percent of live weight and chilled carcass weight. The estimated lean yield was higher in crossbred cattle than crossbred water buffalo. Crude protein, ash, fat, cholesterol, myofibrillar, sarcoplasmic and insoluble protein contents of the beef and carabao meat were all similar. Water holding capacity, pH, muscle fiber diameter, tenderness, firmness and marbling score in carabeef were all comparable to the beef. Redness was found to be higher (P < 0.05) in carabeef than the beef as measured with a color meter. The consumer meat preference survey showed that 55.9% selected the beef while 44.1% preferred carabeef. The color and amount of fat on the outside of the beef sample were primary in buyer selection.

The objective of this study was to compare the fattening performance in Brahman grade cattle (crossbred cattle) and crossbred water buffalo at the same young age and fed with high roughage based fattening rations in the Philippines. Ten crossbred cattle and 10 crossbred water buffalo, aged between 18 and 24 months old were used in this experiment. The animals were fed diets consisting of 85% Napier or Para grass and 15% concentrate mixture (CM) on a dry matter (DM) basis. The grass, total DM intake and bodyweight gain were significantly (P < 0.01) higher for the crossbred water buffalo than for the cattle. There was no species significant difference in the digestion coefficient and feed conversion rate between the crossbred cattle and water buffalo. The return over feed cost for fattening was significantly (P < 0.05) higher in the crossbred water buffalo than in the cattle. These results clearly indicate that under high roughage-based fattening rations, young crossbred water buffalo are better able to utilize the roughage and they perform better in terms of feed intake and live weight gains than the crossbred cattle in the Philippines.

Circulating leptin is regulated by food intake in the long, medium and short term; however, little is known about putative remnant effects of these successive regulations at any given time. To clarify this, two experiments were conducted in adult sheep, during which body condition parameters and plasma leptin were measured. During experiment 1, twenty ewes with normal body condition were either well fed (101 % of maintenance energy requirements (MER)) or underfed (41 % MER) for 166 d, then rapidly re-fed (at a mean of 208 % MER) for 3 d. Leptinaemia decreased after 14 d of underfeeding, remained depressed until day 166 and did not increase after 3 d re-feeding, whereas it was increased (þ153 %; P, 0·05) by re-feeding the previously well-fed ewes. During experiment 2, twenty-four fat or lean ewes were either well fed (114 % MER) or underfed (52 % MER) for 94 d, and gradually re-fed for 2 d and maintained at a high feeding level (235 % MER) for 9 d. Underfeeding decreased leptinaemia in fat (from 4·19 to 2·63 ng/ml) but not lean ewes, and re-feeding increased leptinaemia after 5 d in lean previously well-fed (þ123 %; P, 0·05) but not underfed ewes. In fat ewes, the impact of re-feeding was rapid (þ 144 %; P,0·001 at 5 d) in previously well-fed ewes, whereas it was more gradual with a maximum at 11 d (þ162 %; P,0·01) in previously underfed ewes. In conclusion, leptinaemia is modulated by shortterm energy intake level in interaction with long-term regulations involving nutritional history and body fatness, suggesting that a biological threshold of adiposity (about 20 %) is necessary to allow short-and medium-term leptin regulation.

No abstract