Background/ObjectivesUnderstanding of the patterns and predictors of intra-household food allocation could enable nutrition programs to better target nutritionally vulnerable individuals. This study aims to characterise the status and determinants of intra-household food and nutrient allocation in Nepal.Subjects/MethodsPregnant women, their mothers-in-law, and male households heads from Dhanusha and Mahottari districts in Nepal responded to 24-hour dietary recalls, thrice-repeated on non-consecutive days (n=150 households; 1278 individual recalls). Intra-household inequity was measured using ratios between household members in: food intakes (‘food shares’); food-energy intake proportions (‘food shares-to-energy shares’, FS:ES); calorie-requirement proportions (‘Relative Dietary Energy Adequacy Ratios’, RDEARs); and Mean Probability of Adequacy for 11 micronutrients (MPA ratios). Hypothesised determinants were collected during the recalls, and their associations with the outcomes were tested using multivariable mixed-effects linear regression models.ResultsWomen’s diets (pregnant women and mothers-in-law) consisted of larger FS:ES of starchy foods, pulses, fruits, and vegetables than male household heads, whereas men had larger FS:ES of animal-source foods. Pregnant women had the lowest MPA (37%) followed by their mothers-in-law (52%), and male household heads (57%). RDEARs between pregnant women and household heads were 31% higher (log-RDEAR coeff=0.27 (95% CI 0.12,0.42), P<0.001) when pregnant women earned more or the same as their spouse, and log-MPA ratios between pregnant women and mothers-in-law were positively associated with household-level calorie intakes (coeff=0.43 (0.23,0.63), P<0.001, per 1000 kcal).ConclusionsPregnant women receive inequitably lower shares of food and nutrients, but this could be improved by increasing pregnant women’s cash earnings and household food security.
BackgroundThere is scarce evidence on the impacts of food transfers, cash transfers, or women's groups on food sharing, dietary intakes, or nutrition during pregnancy, when nutritional needs are elevated.ObjectiveThis study measured the effects of 3 pregnancy-focused nutrition interventions on intrahousehold food allocation, dietary adequacy, and maternal nutritional status in Nepal.MethodsInterventions tested in a cluster-randomized controlled trial (ISRCTN 75964374) were “Participatory Learning and Action” (PLA) monthly women's groups, PLA with transfers of 10 kg fortified flour (“Super Cereal”), and PLA plus transfers of 750 Nepalese rupees (∼US$7.5) to pregnant women. Control clusters received usual government services. Primary outcomes were Relative Dietary Energy Adequacy Ratios (RDEARs) between pregnant women and male household heads and pregnant women and their mothers-in-law. Diets were measured by repeated 24-h dietary recalls.ResultsRelative to control, RDEARs between pregnant women and their mothers-in-law were 12% higher in the PLA plus food arm (log-RDEAR coefficient = 0.12; 95% CI: 0.02, 0.21; P = 0.014), but 10% lower in the PLA-only arm between pregnant women and male household heads (−0.11; 95% CI: −0.19, −0.02; P = 0.020). In all interventions, pregnant women's energy intakes did not improve, but odds of pregnant women consuming iron-folate supplements were 2.5–4.6 times higher, odds of pregnant women consuming more animal-source foods than the household head were 1.7–2.4 times higher, and midupper arm circumference was higher relative to control. Dietary diversity was 0.4 food groups higher in the PLA plus cash arm than in the control arm.ConclusionsAll interventions improved maternal diets and nutritional status in pregnancy. PLA women's groups with food transfers increased equity in energy allocation, whereas PLA with cash improved dietary diversity. PLA alone improved diets, but effects were mixed. Scale-up of these interventions in marginalized populations is a policy option, but researchers should find ways to increase adherence to interventions. This trial was registered at www.controlled-trials.com as ISRCTN 75964374.
Objective: To develop and validate a photographic food atlas of common foods for dietary assessment in southern Nepal. Design: We created a life-sized photographic atlas of forty locally prepared foods. Between March and June 2014, data collectors weighed portion sizes that respondents consumed during one mealtime and then a different data collector revisited the household the next day to record respondents' estimations of their previous day's intakes using the atlas. Validity was assessed by percentage error, Cohen's weighted kappa (κ w ) and Bland-Altman limits of agreement. Setting: Dhanusha and Mahottari districts in southern Nepal. Subjects: A random sample of ninety-five adults in forty-eight rural households with a pregnant woman. Results: Overall, respondents underestimated their intakes (mean error = − 4·5 %). Rice and dal (spiced lentil soup) intakes were underestimated (−14·1 % and −34·5 %, respectively), but vegetable curry intake was overestimated (+20·8 %). Rice and vegetable curry portion size images were significantly reliably selected (Cohen's κ w (SE): rice = 0·391 (0·105); vegetable curry = 0·430 (0·139)), whereas dal images were not. Energy intake over one mealtime was under-reported by an average of 569 kJ (136 kcal; 4·5 % error) using recall compared with the weighing method. Conclusions: The photographic atlas is a useful tool for field estimation of dietary intake. Average errors were low, and there was 'modest' agreement between weighed and recalled portion size image selection of rice and vegetable curry food items. Error in energy estimation was low but with wide limits of agreement, suggesting that there is scope for future work to reduce error further.
With sufficient time dedicated to development and pre-testing, this novel smartphone-based tool provides a useful method to collect data. Future work is needed to further validate this tool and adapt it for other contexts.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.