2016
DOI: 10.1017/s1368980016000537
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development and validation of a photographic food atlas for portion size assessment in the southern plains of Nepal

Abstract: Objective: To develop and validate a photographic food atlas of common foods for dietary assessment in southern Nepal. Design: We created a life-sized photographic atlas of forty locally prepared foods. Between March and June 2014, data collectors weighed portion sizes that respondents consumed during one mealtime and then a different data collector revisited the household the next day to record respondents' estimations of their previous day's intakes using the atlas. Validity was assessed by percentage error,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
38
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These traditional habits may lead to additional challenges for the participants in this study to estimate food portions. In populations where measuring foods is not commonly practiced, accurate conceptualization of food portions might be lower leading to higher portion size estimation errors [ 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These traditional habits may lead to additional challenges for the participants in this study to estimate food portions. In populations where measuring foods is not commonly practiced, accurate conceptualization of food portions might be lower leading to higher portion size estimation errors [ 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A novel food atlas was developed for culturally-relevant food items in Singapore and used to support the collection of dietary recall data [ 41 ]. While similar tools have been used in other populations effectively [ 67 , 68 ], it must be noted that the current tool has not been validated. Nonetheless, the authors believe that this approach helped to ensure better estimation of food portion sizes by respondents, thereby benefitting the overarching study outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The three portion sizes considered to be representative of the range of portion sizes actually consumed (22–24) were placed on a white dining plate (26 cm in diameter) in a colored background contrast. All photographs were taken at approximately the same angle of 45° and from a distance of 50 cm above the plate, which was considered the best compromise between showing the depth and height of the food (25). This technique, sitting at a table, is necessary to show the differences between the size of the portions depending on the height of the food on a plate and depth in a soup bowl (15).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%