No abstract

The detection of Δ -tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), cannabidiol (CBD) and cannabinol (CBN) in hair, for the purpose of identifying cannabis consumption, is conducted in many forensic laboratories. Since external contamination of hair with these cannabis components cannot be excluded, even after hair decontamination, only the detection of THC metabolites such as 11-nor-9-carboxy-Δ -tetrahydrocannabinol (THC-COOH) or 11-hydroxy-Δ -tetrahydrocannabinol (OH-THC), is considered to prove cannabis consumption. At present, testing for THC metabolites is not standard practice due to its analytical complexity. For these reasons, we developed a novel method for the detection of THC-COOH and OH-THC as well as THC, CBD, and CBN in one single analytical run using gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS) with electron ionization. After manual hair washing and grinding, sample preparation was fully automated, by means of a robotic autosampler. The hair extraction took place by digestion with sodium hydroxide. A solid-phase extraction (SPE) was chosen for sample clean-up, using a mixed-mode anion exchange sorbent. Derivatization of all analytes was by silylation. The method has been fully validated according to guidelines of the Society of Toxicological and Forensic Chemistry (GTFCh), with a limit of detection (LOD) of 0.2 pg/mg for THC-COOH and OH-THC and 2 pg/mg for THC, CBD and CBN, respectively, thus fulfilling the Society of Hair Testing (SoHT) recommendations. The validated method has been successfully applied to our routine forensic case work and a summary of data from authentic hair samples is given, as well as data from proficiency tests.

This article comprises the development and validation of a protocol for the qualitative analysis of 61 phase I synthetic cannabinoid metabolites in urine originating from 29 synthetic cannabinoids, combining solid‐phase extraction (SPE) utilizing a reversed phase silica‐based sorbent (phenyl) with liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (LC−MS/MS). Validation was performed according to the guidelines of the German Society of Toxicological and Forensic Chemistry. Sufficient chromatographic separation was achieved within a total runtime of 12.3 minutes. Validation included specificity and selectivity, limit of detection (LOD), recovery and matrix effects, as well as auto‐sampler stability of processed urine samples. LOD ranged between 0.025 ng/mL and 0.5 ng/mL in urine. Recovery ranged between 43% and 97%, with only two analytes exhibiting recoveries below 50%. However, for those two analytes, the LODs were 0.05 ng/mL in urine. In addition, matrix effects between 81% and 185% were determined, whereby matrix effects over 125% were observed for 10 non‐first‐generation synthetic cannabinoid metabolites. The developed method enables the rapid and sensitive detection of synthetic cannabinoid metabolites in urine, complementing the spectrum of existing analytical tools in forensic case work. Finally, application to 61 urine samples from both routine and autopsy case work yielded one urine sample that tested positive for ADB‐PINACA N‐pentanoic acid.

No abstract

In cases where there is a question as to whether children have come into contact with drugs, examinations of their scalp hair are frequently carried out. Positive test results are often discussed in the forensic community due to the various possible modes via which drugs and their metabolites can be incorporated into the hair. These include drug uptake by the child (e.g. oral ingestion or inhalation), but also contamination of hair via contact with the sweat from drug users. In this study, the possibility of methadone and its metabolite EDDP being incorporated into children’s hair by contact with sweat from persons undergoing opiate maintenance therapy (methadone) was examined. The transfer of methadone and EDDP via sweat from methadone patients (n = 15) to children’s hair was simulated by close skin contact of drug-free children’s hair, encased in mesh-pouches, for 5 days. Sweat-collecting patches (hereafter referred to as ‘sweat patches’) were applied to the test persons’ skin. One strand of hair and one sweat patch were collected daily from each patient. Analyses were performed using GC–MS/MS (hair) and LC–MS/MS (serum, sweat patches). After 4 days of skin contact, methadone was detectable in the formerly drug-free hair strands in all 15 study participants. EDDP was detectable in 34 of 75 hair strands, with the maximum number of positive results (11 EDDP-positive hair strands) being detected after 5 days. These results show that transfer of methadone and EDDP to drug-free hair is possible through close skin contact with individuals taking part in methadone substitution programmes. A correlation between serum concentration, sweat concentration and substance concentration in hair strands could not be demonstrated, but a tendency towards higher concentrations due to longer contact time is clearly evident.