Screening is a useful method for detecting asymptomatic RHD in regions of high prevalence and we report a high echocardiographically confirmed prevalence. The most appropriate screening strategy remains to be confirmed, however, and implementation will depend on the availability of echocardiography and trained staff.

No abstract

No abstract

The International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) has provided valuable information regarding international prevalence patterns and potential risk factors for asthma, allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and eczema. However, the only Pacific countries that participated in ISAAC Phase I were Australia and New Zealand, and these included only a small number of Pacific children. Phase III has involved not only repeating the Phase I survey to examine time trends, but also to include centres and countries which are of interest but did not participate in Phase I. The ISAAC Phase III study was therefore conducted in the Pacific (in French Polynesia, New Caledonia, Tonga, Fiji Islands, Samoa, Cook Islands, Tokelau Islands and Niue). The overall prevalence rates of current symptoms (in the last 12 months) were 9.9% for asthma, 16.4% for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and 10.7% for atopic eczema. The prevalence of current wheezing (9.9%) was generally much lower than that has been observed in Pacific children in New Zealand (31%), but there was considerable variation between the various Pacific centres: Tokelau Islands (19.7%), Tonga (16.2%), Niue (12.7%), French Polynesia (11.3%), Cook Islands (10.6%), Fiji Islands (10.4%), New Caledonia (8.2%) and Samoa (5.8%). The reasons for these differences in prevalence across the Pacific are unclear and require further research. The finding that prevalence levels are generally considerably lower than those in Pacific children in New Zealand adds to previous evidence that children who migrate experience an altered risk of asthma as a result of exposure to a new environment during childhood.

Aim To enable improvements in global child health, the focus must move beyond child survival to child wellbeing. In the Pacific Islands, the wellbeing of children has received little attention. This study aimed to investigate the wellbeing of children from three primary schools in Tonga. Methods A cross‐sectional survey was completed in three primary schools in Nuku'alofa with children aged 5–15 years. The study participants (256 children, 143 caregivers) completed the Child Health and Illness Profile – Child Edition, CHIP‐CE (Version 1.0). Results On average, >70% of children and caregivers described home and school environments as positive. From the children's reports, boys had significantly lower scores for risk avoidance than girls (3.40 vs. 3.73, P < 0.001). Children aged 5–7 versus 8–15 years had significantly lower scores for satisfaction (3.63 vs. 3.92, P = 0.002), resilience (3.34 vs. 3.56, P = 0.016) and achievement (3.25 vs. 3.62, P = 0.002). From the caregivers' report, girls had significantly lower scores for academic performance than boys (3.60 vs. 3.81, P = 0.04). Boys had significantly lower scores for individual risk association compared to girls (3.93 vs. 4.29, P = 0.01). Overall CHIP‐CE scores were lower than those of comparable populations in the West, while at the same time protective factors were documented. Conclusions Understanding child wellbeing in the Pacific is critical for strengthening protective factors known to mitigate poor child health outcomes. Continuing to base global child health success on child survival alone misses opportunities for improving the wellbeing of nations.