This manuscript provides the results of an in-depth survey assessment of the capabilities, experience, and perspectives on continuous processing in the pharmaceutical sector, with respondents from both pharmaceutical companies and Contract Manufacturing Organizations (CMOs). The survey includes staffing (personnel), chemistry, reaction platforms, postreaction processing, analytical, regulatory, and factors that influence the adoption of continuous manufacturing. The results of the survey demonstrate that the industry has been increasing, and will continue to increase, the portion of total manufacturing executed as continuous processes with a decrease in batch processing. In general, most of the experience with continuous processing on scale have been enabling reaction chemistry, while postprocessing and analytical remain in the very early stages of development and implementation.

The development of reactions in a continuous fashion in plug flow tube reactors (PFR) offers unique advantages to the drug development and scale-up process and can also enable chemistry that would be difficult to perform via batch processing. Herein, we report the development of two different continuous flow approaches to a key 1H-4-substituted imidazole intermediate ( 5). In a first generation approach, rapid optimization and scale-up of a challenging cyclization reaction was demonstrated in a PFR under GMP conditions to afford 29 kg of protected product 2. This material was further processed in batch equipment to deliver di-HCl salt 4. This first generation approach highlights the rapid development of chemistry in research-scale PFRs and speed to material delivery through linear scale up to a pilot-scale PFR under GMP conditions. In a second generation effort, a more efficient synthetic route was developed, and PFRs with automated sampling, dilution, and analytical analysis allowed for rapid and data-rich reaction optimization of both a key cyclization reaction and thermal removal of a Boc protecting group. This work culminated in 1 kg demonstration runs in a 0.22 L PFR for both continuous steps and shows the potential of commercialization from a lab hood footprint (1−2 MT/year).

A batch process was developed to produce 1-(azidomethyl)-3,5-bis-(trifluoromethyl)benzene, 1, in 94% yield by an efficient nucleophilic substitution reaction between 3,5-bis-(trifluoromethyl)benzyl chloride, 4, and sodium azide. Hydrazoic acid (HN3), a toxic volatile compound with explosive properties, can be formed in the reactor headspace during conventional batch processing that requires significant engineering controls. In order to improve the overall safety profile, the process to produce azide 1 was optimized for operation in a microcapillary tube reactor. In addition, azide 1 was prepared in a simple biphasic solvent system using phase-transfer catalysis which results in an overall low e-factor. The product was purified via wiped film evaporation (WFE) technology.

Development of a small volume continuous process that used a combination of batch and flow unit operations to manufacture the small molecule oncolytic candidate merestinib is described. Continuous processing was enabled following the identification and development of suitable chemical transformations and unit operations. Aspects of the nascent process control strategy were evaluated in the context of a 20 kg laboratory demonstration campaign, executed in walk-in fume hoods at a throughput of 5–10 kg of active pharmaceutical ingredient per day. The process comprised an automated Suzuki–Miyaura cross-coupling reaction, a nitro-group hydrogenolysis, a continuous amide bond formation, and a continuous deprotection. Three of the four steps were purified using mixed-suspension, mixed-product removal crystallizations. Process analytical technology enabled real-time or nearly real-time process diagnostics. Findings from the demonstration campaign informed a second process development cycle as well as decision making for what steps to implement using continuous processing in a proximate manufacturing campaign, which will be described in part 2 of this series.

A flow Barbier process was developed to produce a key intermediate in the edivoxetine·HCl registered sequence. The control strategy was developed based on a critical understanding of integrated parameters and design space requirements for a continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) process. In this flow Barbier process, the Grignard reagent formation and reaction occurs in a single CSTR, with quenching of the resulting tetrahedral intermediate in a second CSTR. Real time Process Analytical Technology (PAT) monitoring was used to assist process development and understanding. The postquench liquid–liquid separation was continuous, and the quenched intermediate flowed directly into a neutralization CSTR to minimize the epimerization potential of the quenched intermediate. The optimized process was run for 80 consecutive hours in 2 L CSTRs where magnesium was recharged every 4 h for the first half of the continuous campaign and every 8 h for the second half with no quantifiable differences in performance. The Barbier process delivered in situ >99% ee which is sufficient for telescoping into the next step. The process development is intended to support a Quality by Design (Qbd) regulatory submission.