Gliomas are the most common intracranial tumors. In the US, approximately 15,000 patients die with glioblastoma per year (CBTRUS 2002). Despite modern diagnostics and treatments the median survival time does not exceed 15 months. However, it has long been observed that after surgical removal, tumors recur predominantly within 1 cm of the resection cavity. This is mainly due to the fact that at the time of surgery, cells from the bulk tumor have already invaded normal brain tissue. Decades ago Matsukado showed that more than 50% of untreated brain tumors had already reached the contralateral hemisphere (J Neurosurg 18: 636-644, 1961). Therefore one of the most important hallmarks of malignant gliomas is their invasive behavior. Dandy already recognized the highly invasive characteristics of this tumor type and performed hemispherectomy in patients with preoperative hemiplegia (J Am Med Assoc 90: 823-825, 1928). Despite his and others' heroic efforts, recurrence was detected as early as 3 months after surgery (Bell, LJ: J Neurosurg 6: 285-293, 1949), leading to the discontinuation of this radical approach. Diffuse gliomas remain a particularly challenging clinical management problem. Over the last 20 years no significant increase in survival of patients suffering from this disease has been achieved. Even drugs directed against newly identified targets like MMPs or angiogenesis-related targets fail to increase survival duration (Tonn, Goldbrunner: Acta Neurochir Suppl 88: 163-167, 2003) Furthermore, anti-angiogenic drugs have been shown to increase glioma invasiveness, finally leading to gliomatosis cerebri. (Lamszus et al.: Acta Neurochir Suppl 88: 169-177, 2003). In this review we focus on the main features which may underlie the invasive phenotype of human gliomas, and offer a biological basis for optimism towards therapeutic advances to come.

Glioblastoma multiforme is the most common and lethal primary malignant brain tumor. Although considerable progress has been made in technical proficiencies of surgical and radiation treatment for brain tumor patients, the impact of these advances on clinical outcome has been disappointing, with median survival time not exceeding 15 months. Over the last 30 years, no significant increase in survival of patients suffering from this disease has been achieved. A fundamental source of the management challenge presented in glioma patients is the insidious propensity of tumor invasion into distant brain tissue. Invasive tumor cells escape surgical removal and geographically dodge lethal radiation exposure and chemotherapy. Recent improved understanding of biochemical and molecular determinants of glioma cell invasion provide valuable insight into the underlying biological features of the disease, as well as illuminating possible new therapeutic targets. These findings are moving forward to translational research and clinical trials as novel antiglioma therapies.

Invasion is a defining hallmark of glioblastoma multiforme, just as metastasis characterizes other high-grade tumors. Glial tumors invariably recur due to the regrowth of invasive cells, which are unaffected by standard treatment modalities. Drivers of glioma invasion include autocrine signals propagated by secreted factors that signal through receptors on the tumor. These secreted factors are able to diffuse through the peritumoral stroma, thereby influencing parenchymal cells that surround the tumor mass. Here we describe various autocrine motility factors that are expressed by invasive glioma cells and explore the effects that they may have on normal cells present in the path of invasion. Conversely, normal brain parenchymal cells secrete ligands that can stimulate receptors on invasive glioma cells and potentially facilitate glioma invasion or create a permissive microenvironment for malignant progression. Parallel observations have been made for solid tumors of epithelial origin, in which parenchymal and stromal cells either support or suppress tumor invasion. Most autocrine and paracrine interactions involved in glioma invasion constitute known signaling systems in stages of central nervous system development that involve the migration of precursor cells that populate the developing brain. Key paracrine interactions between glioma cells and the brain microenvironment can influence glioma pathobiology and therefore contribute to its poor prognosis. Current therapies for glioma that could have an impact on paracrine communication between tumors and normal cells are discussed. We suggest that cells in the normal brain parenchyma be considered as potential targets for adjuvant therapies to control glioma growth because such cells are less likely to develop resistance than glioma cells.

Glioblastoma, the most malignant form of brain cancer, is responsible for 23% of primary brain tumors and has extremely poor outcome. Confounding the clinical management of glioblastomas is the extreme local invasiveness of these cancer cells. The mechanisms that govern invasion are poorly understood. To gain insight into glioblastoma invasion, we conducted experiments on the patterns of growth and dispersion of U87 glioblastoma tumor spheroids in a three-dimensional collagen gel. We studied two different cell lines, one with a mutation to the EGFR (U87DeltaEGFR) that is associated with increased malignancy, and one with an endogenous (wild-type) receptor (U87WT). We developed a continuum mathematical model of the dispersion behaviors with the aim of identifying and characterizing discrete cellular mechanisms underlying invasive cell motility. The mathematical model quantitatively reproduces the experimental data, and indicates that the U87WT invasive cells have a stronger directional motility bias away from the spheroid center as well as a faster rate of cell shedding compared to the U87DeltaEGFR cells. The model suggests that differences in tumor cell dispersion may be due to differences in the chemical factors produced by cells, differences in how the two cell lines remodel the gel, or different cell-cell adhesion characteristics.

PurposeAberrant Notch signaling has been implicated in the pathogenesis of many human cancers. MK-0752 is a potent, oral inhibitor of γ-secretase, an enzyme required for Notch pathway activation. Safety, maximum-tolerated dose, pharmacokinetics (PKs), pharmacodynamics, and preliminary antitumor efficacy were assessed in a phase I study of MK-0752.Patients and MethodsMK-0752 was administered in three different schedules to patients with advanced solid tumors. Hair follicles were collected at higher dose levels to assess a gene signature of Notch inhibition.ResultsOf 103 patients who received MK-0752, 21 patients received a continuous once-daily dosing at 450 and 600 mg; 17 were dosed on an intermittent schedule of 3 of 7 days at 450 and 600 mg; and 65 were dosed once per week at 600, 900, 1,200, 1,500, 1,800, 2,400, 3,200, and 4,200 mg. The most common drug-related toxicities were diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and fatigue. PKs (area under the concentration-time curve and maximum measured plasma concentration) increased in a less than dose proportional manner, with a half-life of approximately 15 hours. Significant inhibition of Notch signaling was observed with the 1,800- to 4,200-mg weekly dose levels, confirming target engagement at those doses. One objective complete response and an additional 10 patients with stable disease longer than 4 months were observed among patients with high-grade gliomas.ConclusionMK-0752 toxicity was schedule dependent. Weekly dosing was generally well tolerated and resulted in strong modulation of a Notch gene signature. Clinical benefit was observed, and rational combination trials are currently ongoing to maximize clinical benefit with this novel agent.

Purpose Investigate the efficacy and pharmacodynamic effects of MK-1775, a potent Wee1 inhibitor, in both monotherapy and in combination with gemcitabine using a panel of p53-deficient and p53-wild type human pancreatic cancer xenografts. Experimental design Nine individual patient-derived pancreatic cancer xenografts (six with p53-deficient and three with p53-wild type status) from the PancXenoBank collection at Johns Hopkins were treated with MK-1775, gemcitabine or gemcitabine followed 24 h later by MK-1775 for 4 weeks. Tumor growth rate/regressions were calculated on day 28. Target modulation was assessed by western blot and IHC. Results MK-1775 treatment led to the inhibition of Wee1 kinase and reduced inhibitory phosphorylation of its substrate Cdc2. MK-1775, when dosed with gemcitabine, abrogated the checkpoint arrest to promote mitotic entry and facilitated tumor cell death as compared to control and gemcitabine treated tumors. MK-1775 monotherapy did not induce tumor regressions. However, the combination of gemcitabine with MK-1775 produced robust anti-tumor activity and remarkably enhanced tumor regression response (4.01 fold) compared to gemcitabine treatment in p53-deficient tumors. Tumor re-growth curves plotted after the drug treatment period suggest that the effect of the combination therapy is longer-lasting than that of gemcitabine. None of the agents produced tumor regressions in p53-wild type xenografts. Conclusions These results indicate that MK-1775 selectively synergizes with gemcitabine to achieve tumor regressions, selectively in p53-deficient pancreatic cancer xenografts.

Purpose AZD1775 is a WEE1 kinase inhibitor targeting G2 checkpoint control, preferentially sensitizing TP53-deficient tumor cells to DNA damage. This phase I study evaluated safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of oral AZD1775 as monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy in patients with refractory solid tumors. Patients and Methods In part 1, patients received a single dose of AZD1775 followed by 14 days of observation. In part 2, patients received AZD1775 as a single dose (part 2A) or as five twice per day doses or two once per day doses (part 2B) in combination with one of the following chemotherapy agents: gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m), cisplatin (75 mg/m), or carboplatin (area under the curve, 5 mg/mL⋅min). Skin biopsies were collected for pharmacodynamic assessments. TP53 status was determined retrospectively in archival tumor tissue. Results Two hundred two patients were enrolled onto the study, including nine patients in part 1, 43 in part 2A (including eight rollover patients from part 1), and 158 in part 2B. AZD1775 monotherapy given as single dose was well tolerated, and the maximum-tolerated dose was not reached. In the combination regimens, the most common adverse events consisted of fatigue, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, and hematologic toxicity. The maximum-tolerated doses and biologically effective doses were established for each combination. Target engagement, as a predefined 50% pCDK1 reduction in surrogate tissue, was observed in combination with cisplatin and carboplatin. Of 176 patients evaluable for efficacy, 94 (53%) had stable disease as best response, and 17 (10%) achieved a partial response. The response rate in TP53-mutated patients (n = 19) was 21% compared with 12% in TP53 wild-type patients (n = 33). Conclusion AZD1775 was safe and tolerable as a single agent and in combination with chemotherapy at doses associated with target engagement.

Encorafenib, a selective BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi), has a pharmacologic profile that is distinct from that of other clinically active BRAFis. We evaluated encorafenib in a phase I study in patients with BRAFi treatment-naïve and pretreated -mutant melanoma. The pharmacologic activity of encorafenib was first characterized preclinically. Encorafenib monotherapy was then tested across a range of once-daily (50-700 mg) or twice-daily (75-150 mg) regimens in a phase I, open-label, dose-escalation and -expansion study in adult patients with histologically confirmed advanced/metastatic -mutant melanoma. Study objectives were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended phase II dose (RP2D), characterize the safety and tolerability and pharmacokinetic profile, and assess the preliminary antitumor activity of encorafenib. Preclinical data demonstrated that encorafenib inhibited BRAF V600E kinase activity with a prolonged off-rate and suppressed proliferation and tumor growth of V600E-mutant melanoma models. In the dose-escalation phase, 54 patients (29 BRAFi-pretreated and 25 BRAFi-naïve) were enrolled. Seven patients in the dose-determining set experienced dose-limiting toxicities. Encorafenib at a dose of 300 mg once daily was declared the RP2D. In the expansion phase, the most common all-cause adverse events were nausea (66%), myalgia (63%), and palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (54%). In BRAFi-naïve patients, the overall response rate (ORR) and median progression-free survival (mPFS) were 60% and 12.4 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 7.4-not reached (NR)]. In BRAFi-pretreated patients, the ORR and mPFS were 22% and 1.9 months (95% CI, 0.9-3.7). Once-daily dosing of single-agent encorafenib had a distinct tolerability profile and showed varying antitumor activity across BRAFi-pretreated and BRAFi-naïve patients with advanced/metastatic melanoma. .