Combinatorial catalyst design is hardly generalizable, and the empirical aspect of the research has biased the literature data toward accidentally found combinations. Here, 300 quaternary solid catalysts are randomly sampled from a materials space consisting of 36,540 catalysts, and their performance in the oxidative coupling of methane is evaluated by a high-throughput screening instrument. The obtained bias-free data set is analyzed to withdraw catalyst design guidelines. Even with random sampling, 51 catalysts out of the 300 provide a C 2 yield sufficiently superior to the noncatalytic free radical process. Data analysis suggests the significance of choosing synergistic combinations, and such combinations could be generalized based on the group in the periodic table. Decision tree classification is successfully implemented to facilitate efficient sampling of quaternary catalysts toward a better C 2 yield.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.