2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2017.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fabrication of new composite membrane filled with UiO-66 nanoparticles and its application to nanofiltration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, the decrease in rejection across these membranes points toward the concentration polarization phenomenon since increment in CMS loadings more than 1 wt.% caused pore blockage, resulting in accumulation of rejected solute, less permeate flux, and decreased rejection. Such behavior of decreased rejection with higher loadings in the membrane matrix has been previously reported in the literature (Ansari et al, 2015; Trinh et al, 2017). Hosseini et al (2016) stated that 5% decrease in rejection of Na 2 SO 4 occurred as loading of filler was increased from 0.5 to 1 wt.% in PES polymer matrix.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, the decrease in rejection across these membranes points toward the concentration polarization phenomenon since increment in CMS loadings more than 1 wt.% caused pore blockage, resulting in accumulation of rejected solute, less permeate flux, and decreased rejection. Such behavior of decreased rejection with higher loadings in the membrane matrix has been previously reported in the literature (Ansari et al, 2015; Trinh et al, 2017). Hosseini et al (2016) stated that 5% decrease in rejection of Na 2 SO 4 occurred as loading of filler was increased from 0.5 to 1 wt.% in PES polymer matrix.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…However, increased CMS loading resulted in increased viscosity of the solution, which slowed down the solvent–nonsolvent exchange during the phase inversion, hence changing the membrane morphology to compact structure. Several researchers have observed the same results (Ansari, Moghadassi, & Hosseini, 2015; Baghbanzadeh, Rana, Matsuura, & Lan, 2015; Ghaemi et al, 2015; Rajabi et al, 2015; Trinh, Tran, & Taniike, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 62%
“…In our recent publication, a novel strategy was proposed to form an MOF-based composite membrane for nanofiltration [27], in which a suspension of UiO-66 nanoparticles as one of the most stable frameworks in water [28,29,30] was deposited onto a regenerated cellulose (RC) support via suction filtration. The nanoparticles were filled in the pore network or loaded on the external surface of the support membrane to form a selective layer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The level of organic pollutants in the environment has been increasing rapidly due to urbanization and industrialization, therefore posing health risks to all living things. [1][2][3] As the removal of organic pollutants from the environment has become a strenuous task, various conventional methods, such as flocculation, adsorption, biological process, and membrane technology, have been employed. [4][5][6][7][8] Despite the fact that every process has its pros and cons, the membrane separation technique has garnered considerable interest in wastewater purification due to its simple operation process, less energy consumption, cost-effectiveness, and stable product quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%