Assessment of the unbound pharmacologically active fraction (fu; as the ratio of unbound to total concentration) of dolutegravir could improve therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in patients that experience virological failure or toxicity, despite receiving adequate total concentrations. This study evaluated (i) dolutegravir's fu through equilibrium dialysis (ED), (ii) the pre-analytical parameters that influence fu, and (iii) fu's inter-individual variability in HIV patients. Validation of the LC-MS/MS method followed FDA guidelines. The results, based on coefficients of variation (results from nominal concentrations <15%), allowed accurate measurement of unbound and total dolutegravir concentrations. Equilibrium during ED was obtained in 4h. Sparse non-specific binding (9%) was observed, allowing results interpretation without interference. Steps before analysis (e.g., conservation at +4°C, freeze/thaw cycles) did not influence fu, allowing easy integration of fu analysis within laboratory routines. Anticoagulants from samples (citrated versus heparinized; p<0.001) and hemolysis (p=0.007) influenced fu and could lead to misinterpretation. Developed was then performed to the HIV-patients' plasma (n=54). Results, expressed as median InterQuartile Range [25%;75%] were 0.45% IQR [0.38; 0.55] for fu, 9.26μg/L IQR [4.62; 15.14] for unbound, and 2035μg/L IQR [878.5; 2640] for total concentration. The high inter-individual variability observed in the unbound form from HIV patients was a first step towards integrating dolutegravir TDM.

No abstract

Dolutegravir therapeutic drug monitoring (tDM) could be improved by measuring the unbound dolutegravir plasma concentration (Cu), particularly in patients experiencing virological failure or toxicity despite achieving appropriate DTG total plasma concentrations. Equilibrium dialysis (ED) is the gold standard to measure Cu, but ED is time consuming, precluding its use in clinical practice. In contrast, ultrafiltration is applicable to TDM, but is sensitive to numerous analytical conditions. In order to evaluate measurements of Cu by ultrafiltration, ultrafiltration conditions were validated by comparison with ED. DTG concentrations were measured by LC-MS/MS. Three ultrafiltration factors (temperature, duration and relative centrifugal force [RCF]) were evaluated and compared to ED (25/37 °C), using a design of experiment strategy. Temperature was found to influence Cu results by eD (p = 0.036) and UF (p = 0.002) when results were analysed with ANOVA. Relative centrifugal force (2000 g) and time (20 min) interacted to influence Cu (p = 0.006), while individually they did not influence Cu (p = 0.88 and p = 0.42 for RCF and time). Ultrafiltration conditions which yielded the most comparable results to ED were 37 °C, 1000 g for 20 min. Ultrafiltration results greatly depended on analytical conditions, confirming the need to validate the method by comparison with ED in order to correctly interpret DTG Cu.

Highlights Hydroxychloroquine pharmacokinetic behavior in COVID-19 patients cannot be predicted using the systemic lupus erythematosus population or by rheumatoid arthritis patients. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid could be considered a much more instructive “quality control” matrix than plasma on the degree of hydroxychloroquine exposure in the lung. Low plasma concentrations should not induce an increase of the drug dosage because the lung exposure should be high.