Benign lipomatous lesions involving soft tissue are common musculoskeletal masses that are classified into nine distinct diagnoses: lipoma, lipomatosis, lipomatosis of nerve, lipoblastoma or lipoblastomatosis, angiolipoma, myolipoma of soft tissue, chondroid lipoma, spindle cell lipoma and pleomorphic lipoma, and hibernoma. Soft-tissue lipoma accounts for almost 50% of all soft-tissue tumors. Radiologic evaluation is diagnostic in up to 71% of cases. These lesions are identical to subcutaneous fat on computed tomographic (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) images and may contain thin septa. Lipomatosis represents a diffuse overgrowth of mature fat affecting either subcutaneous tissue, muscle or nerve, and imaging is needed to evaluate lesion extent. Lipoblastoma is a tumor of immature fat occurring in young children, and imaging features may reveal a mixture of fat and nonadipose tissue. Angiolipoma, myolipoma, and chondroid lipoma are rare lipomatous lesions that are infrequently imaged. Spindle cell and pleomorphic lipoma appear as a subcutaneous lipomatous mass in the posterior neck or shoulder, with frequent nonadipose components. Hibernoma appears as a lipomatous mass with serpentine vascular elements. Benign lipomatous lesions affecting bone, joint, or tendon sheath include intraosseous lipoma, parosteal lipoma, liposclerosing myxofibrous tumor, discrete lipoma of joint or tendon sheath, and lipoma arborescens. Intraosseous and parosteal lipoma have a pathognomonic CT or MR appearance, with fat in the marrow space or on the bone surface, respectively. Liposclerosing myxofibrous tumor is a rare intermixed histologic lesion commonly located in the medullary canal of the intertrochanteric femur. Benign lipomatous lesions may occur focally in a joint or tendon sheath or with diffuse villonodular proliferation in the synovium (lipoma arborescens) and are diagnosed based on location and identification of fat. Understanding the spectrum of appearances of the various benign musculoskeletal lipomatous lesions improves radiologic assessment and is vital for optimal patient management.

Static and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging, when added to nonenhanced MR imaging, improved differentiation between benign and malignant soft-tissue lesions.

To identify magnetic resonance (MR) imaging characteristics of normal patellar tendons and those affected by tendinitis, the authors evaluated MR images obtained in 10 healthy volunteers, in 50 patients who underwent MR imaging for evaluation of knee structures other than the patellar tendon, in 11 patients with patellar tendinitis, and in two athletes with patellar tendon injuries. Normal tendons had uniformly low signal intensity on T1-, T2-, and proton-density-weighted images and displayed distinct margins, and the anteroposterior (AP) diameter slightly increased proximally to distally. It was concluded that the AP diameter of a normal tendon, in its proximal portion, should not exceed 7 mm. In patellar tendinitis, the tendon showed increased signal intensity on T1-, T2-, and proton-density-weighted images and increased AP diameter proximally. The margins of affected tendons were indistinct, especially posterior to the thickened segment. In all groups studied, women had thicker proximal tendons than did men.

No abstract

Mammographers occasionally are surprised by the diagnosis of a rare lesion at breast biopsy. The imaging features of some breast lesions are unfamiliar because they are rarely seen in routine mammographic practice and they are not well described or well documented in the radiologic literature. Moreover, there may be wide variation in the appearances of rare breast lesions at mammography and ultrasonography (US). In addition, although a few rare breast lesions have a typical imaging appearance, most have mammographic and US features similar to those of breast carcinomas, and a needle biopsy is almost always necessary to obtain a diagnosis. However, even when a rare breast lesion is diagnosed on the basis of a needle biopsy, knowledge of the imaging features of such lesions may help the radiologist decide whether the results of pathologic analysis concur with the imaging findings and whether surgical excision is necessary. It is therefore important that radiologists be familiar with the broad spectrum of imaging features of rare breast lesions as well as with the correlation between their histopathologic features and their current classification according to the World Health Organization classification system.