The current biopsychosocial model is predominantly descriptive and ontological semantic and formal issues need to be integrated to it in order to update this approach. Covering aspects of both human biology and human personhood requires the level of discretised facts, the level of underlying coherences and their meaning to be taken into account. For the intended and needed update to the biopsychosocial approach, the resulting model must be congruent with both science and humanities. Prevailing models of health/illness and resultant beliefs have considerable power to define which experience of sickness is valid, and who is alleviated from suffering. As a corollary, the responsibility to be as critical, and careful as possible when accepting, using, or developing, a model of human health and the development of illness is imperative. We propose that one way to address this responsibility is to formalise the most insightful and theoretically promising concept of health and the development of illness to date, George Engel’s „biopsychosocial model“ (BPS) [1]. The intention is to inform and influence healthcare research and practice towards more practicable and beneficent treatment of people within the healthcare and allied systems. The groundwork for this is presented in part I and it differentiates this paper from any other so far on the BPS. A new perspective on ancient philosophy helps to avoid separating topics that are indistinguishable, and compounding topics that should be addressed separately. Part II and part III apply this foundation to more specific issues in person-centred healthcare.
To ‘embrace’ focused parts of an addressed environment is the way enclosure of outside foci may be described. Here, the opening of the transfer institution called logical lock (LL) in the previous series of articles points, toward the outside of the individual, selects finite parts of it and either rejects them or utilizes them to achieve the corresponding embodiment. The different layers of the intermediating zone that have in total been described as an individual’s orientation matrix (OM) are described. They consist of mostly invisible, but emotionally perceptible and later intellectually discernible layers, such as the one formed by the personal history, present mood and present feelings, anticipations and expectations. To address a person not as an assembly of discernible organs, but as a person, is hence more demanding than addressing the person only as performing a role, a function. In establishing a logical basis for person-centered healthcare approaches, we introduce further logical and descriptive tools to take the invisible layers into account. This clearly hermeneutical approach is opposed to a method that would hypostasise what in this article are termed ‘naked objects’, abbreviated as NOs. We argue that such NOs exist only as mathematical extrapolations. As abstract extrapolations and, as far as individuality is concerned, they cannot be applied in a meaningful way.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.