This three-week longitudinal field study with an experimental intervention examines the association between daily events and employee stress and health, with a specific focus on positive events. Results suggest that both naturally occurring positive work events and a positive reflection intervention are associated with reduced stress and improved health, though effects vary across momentary, lagged, daily, and day-toevening spillover analyses. Findings are consistent with theory-based predictions: positive events, negative events, and family-to-work conflict independently contribute to perceived stress, blood pressure, physical symptoms, mental health, and work detachment, suggesting that organizations should focus not only on reducing negative events, but also on increasing positive events. These findings show that a brief, end-of-workday positive reflection led to decreased stress and improved health in the evening. Research has established that work stress physically and psychologically damages workers and economically burdens organizations and societies (Pfeffer, 2010; Schnall, Dobson, & Rosskam, 2009). Numerous studies have addressed sources of work stress (e.g., Kamarck et al., 2002), ways to eliminate them from work environments (e.g., Israel, Baker, Goldenhar, Heaney, & Schurman, 1996), and ways to mitigate their negative effects (e.g., Rau, Georgiades, Fredrikson, Lemne, & de Faire, 2001; Van der Doef & Maes, 1998). Overwhelmingly, this line of research has focused on negative aspects of work (e.g., long hours, time pressure, role ambiguity; see Crawford, LePine, & Rich, 2010), with positive aspects of work playing primarily a buffering role. Moreover, research has tended to treat positive work resources (e.g., autonomy, support) as relatively stable characteristics of an environment, despite the fact that theory suggests a more ongoing, dynamic, and continuous depletion and replenishment of resources. Over the past decade, a contrasting line of research has emerged that focuses explicitly on positive events (e.g., positive psychology [Seligman & Csikszentmihalyi, 2000]; positive organizational The first two authors contributed equally to this research. Data were collected when all the authors were at the University of Minnesota.