In the Japanese population on dialysis RCC is more common than TCC. Since long-term dialysis is a risk factor for RCC, regular imaging examinations may have contributed to the favorable outcome of our patients on dialysis with RCC. In contrast, the unfavorable outcome of TCC suggests the need for effective diagnostic measures for early detection of TCC in patients on dialysis.
Head and neck surgeons hesitate to resect the carotid artery because of the postoperative risk of neurologic sequelae. On the other hand, there is no curative therapeutic option for head and neck cancer involving the carotid artery, except for complete tumor removal. A retrospective review of all published articles in the English literature dealing with carotid reconstruction for head and neck cancer from 1987 to 1998 was performed. There were only 11 articles, including our series, that reported outcomes of this procedure. Among the 148 patients of this series, major neuromorbidity was 4.7%, and mortality occurred in 6.8% of the patients. Combined major neuromorbidity and mortality was 10.1%. Because total removal of the advanced cancer is the only therapy that can offer the patients a chance for cure, head and neck surgeons should aggressively perform carotid resection and reconstruction.
Patients with advanced cervical cancers often have direct invasion of their carotid arteries. The prognosis for these patients with nonsurgical therapy is extremely poor. Because complete tumor removal is the only therapy that can offer these patients a chance for cure, carotid resection should be performed. We performed carotid resection and reconstruction on nine patients with advanced cervical cancers. Of these patients, none suffered from severe neurologic postoperative complications such as permanent hemiplegia. Three of the nine patients have been disease free for more than 24 months. These three patients would not have survived without carotid resection. Further study will show the usefulness of carotid resection and reconstruction in decreasing the morbidity and mortality in patients with cervical cancer involving the carotid artery.
The relationship between the types of dialysis membrane used and the prevalence and severity of radiolucent bone cysts (which are a main radiological feature of dialysis amyloidosis) was studied in 30 patients on hemodialysis for more than 10 years. One of them was treated exclusively with cuprophane; the other 29 were dialyzed with cuprophane, and then treated with polyacrylonitrile AN 69. In 12 of the 30 patients, radiolucent bone cysts (at least 5 mm in diameter in the wrists and at least 10 mm in the shoulders or hips) were observed. The patients with bone cysts spent significantly more time on cuprophane dialysis and significantly less time on AN 69 dialysis than the group of patients without bone cysts. Nine of the 14 patients who had been treated with cuprophane for more than 8 years had bone cysts; whereas bone cysts were observed in only 2 of the 12 patients dialyzed for more than 8 years with AN 69. The frequency of bone cysts was significantly different for each of the two groups. There was, however, no significant difference in the total duration of dialysis between the two groups. The severity of the cystic bone lesions correlated positively with the duration of dialysis using cuprophane and negatively with the duration of dialysis using AN 69. These findings suggest that the development of osteoarticular amyloidosis may be related to the type of dialysis membrane used. Hemodialysis using AN 69 membranes may prevent, or at least postpone the development of dialysis amyloidosis.
Our study demonstrated that renal function at the time of biopsy and renal interstitial damage are the best predictors of survival in AL-type renal amyloidosis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.