A new macromolecular antitumor antibiotic, C-1027, shows potent cytotoxic effects and DNA cutting activity. The DNA cleaving properties of C-1027 are compared with those of other enediyne compounds such as neocarzinostatin, esperamicin A1, and calicheamicin gamma 1. Even in the absence of thiols or reductants, the antibiotic C-1027 has high DNA breakage ability. Of special interest is the fact that C-1027 causes strand breaks two base pairs apart at specific sites such as 5'-TAT/3'-ATA and 5'-AGA/3'-TCT (cleavage sites in italics) in the two strands. This novel double-stranded cleavage fashion is different from that of calicheamicin gamma 1, which is found to have a 3-bp separation between cleavage sites on the two strands. The asymmetric cleavage pattern to the 3'-side and a competitive experiment with distamycin A reveal minor-groove interaction of double-helical DNA with C-1027. This antibiotic appears to oxidize DNA through hydrogen abstraction predominantly at the C-4' carbon of deoxyribose. The activation mechanism of C-1027, which contains an enediyne chromophore of the esperamicin/calicheamicin type, has been proposed.
Background: The KYU-RABLE study, a prospective, multicenter, single-arm interventional study, evaluated the efficacy and safety of uninterrupted oral edoxaban in patients undergoing catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods and Results: We enrolled patients with AF from 23 centers in Japan. Edoxaban 60 mg (30 mg in patients indicated for dose adjustment) was administered uninterrupted, once daily in the morning for ≥4 weeks before CA and 4 weeks ±7 days after CA with one dose delayed on the procedural day. The primary endpoint was a composite of thromboembolism and major bleeding during 4 weeks from the procedural day. Among the 513 eligible patients who underwent CA, 63.5% received edoxaban 60 mg/day and 36.1% received 30 mg/day. For the primary endpoint, no thromboembolism and 1 major bleeding event (0.2%, cardiac tamponade) were observed. The plasma edoxaban concentration decreased depending on the time from the last administration to the CA procedure. However, plasma levels of coagulative biomarkers were within appropriate ranges regardless of the interval from the last administration of edoxaban. Conclusions: The present study provided evidence of the efficacy and safety of uninterrupted edoxaban administered once daily in the morning, with one dose delayed on procedural day, in patients with AF undergoing CA. Edoxaban was associated with a low risk of periprocedural thromboembolic and bleeding complications.
Background: Information on prescriptions of oral analgesics for the treatment of pain is beneficial. However, there have been few reports on the prescription status of oral analgesics from a nation-wide, large-scale prescription database in Japan.Research design and methods: The authors analyzed the prescription data of 2,042,302 patients prescribed oral analgesics in 2017. The numbers/proportions of patients prescribed oral analgesics, adherence with approved doses, co-prescription patterns, dose changes, drug adherence, and treatment-discontinuation rates were evaluated. Results: Loxoprofen was prescribed to 32.5% of the patients, followed by celecoxib, prescribed to 16.0% of patients. Acetaminophen and pregabalin were prescribed to 10.5% and 9.4% of patients, respectively. Many analgesics were prescribed at lower doses than the approved doses. The most frequently used concomitant medication was pregabalin. For duloxetine and pregabalin, high proportions of patients were prescribed these drugs for > 90 days. Conclusions: Loxoprofen was the most prescribed of the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in Japan. The information obtained provides an overview of prescribed oral analgesics in Japan and could be useful for potential research into prescribed oral analgesics in the future.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.