The fabrication of polymer microchips allows inexpensive, durable, high-throughput and disposable devices to be made. Poly(methylmethacrylate) (PMMA) microchips have been fabricated by hot embossing microstructures into the substrate followed by bonding a cover plate. Different surface modifications have been examined to enhance substrate and cover plate adhesion, including: air plasma treatment, and both acid catalyzed hydrolysis and aminolysis of the acrylate to yield carboxyl and amine-terminated PMMA surfaces. Unmodified PMMA surfaces were also studied. The substrate and cover plate adhesion strengths were found to increase with the hydrophilicity of the PMMA surface and reached a peak at 600 kN m(-2) for plasma treated PMMA. A solvent assisted system has also been designed to soften less than 50 nm of the surface of PMMA during bonding, while still maintaining microchannel integrity. The extent to which both surface modifications and solvent treatment affected the adhesion of the substrate to the cover plate was examined using nanoindentation methods. The solvent bonding system greatly increased the adhesion strengths for both unmodified and modified PMMA, with a maximum adhesion force of 5500 kN m(-2) achieved for unmodified PMMA substrates. The bond strength decreased with increasing surface hydrophilicity after solvent bonding, a trend that was opposite to what was observed for non-solvent thermal bonding.

Coupling low-flow analytical separation instrumentation such as capillary electrophoresis, capillary electrochromatography, nano-HPLC, and microfluidic-based devices with electrospray ionization mass spectrometry has yielded powerful analytical tools. However, conventional coupling methodologies such as nanospray suffer from limitations including poor conductive coating robustness, constant clogging, complicated fabrication processes, and incompatibility with large flow rate regimes. This study demonstrates that robust nanospray emitters can be fabricated through the formation and utilization of a porous polymer monolith (PPM) at the end of a fused-silica capillary. Stable electrosprays can be produced from capillaries (75-100-microm i.d.) at a variety of flow rates (50-1000 nL/min) without the need to taper the capillaries by etching or pulling. The PPM is photopatterned to be present only near the capillary exit aperture using conditions that generate pore sizes similar to those seen with nanospray tips. The porous nature of the PPM aids in developing a stable electrospray generating a single clearly visible Taylor cone at relatively high flow rates while at low flow rates (<100 nL/min) a mist, presumably from multiple small Taylor cones, develops. The hydrophobic nature of the PPM should limit problems with band broadening associated with droplet spreading at the capillary exit, while the multiple flow paths inherent in the PPM minimize clogging problems associated with conventional nanospray emitters. Total ion current traces for a constant infusion of standard PPG and cytochrome c solutions are very stable with deviations ranging from only 3 to 8%. The PPM-assisted electrospray produces mass spectra with excellent signal-to-noise ratios from only a few femtomoles of material.

No abstract

A dessert matrix previously used for diagnosis of food allergies was incurred with pasteurised egg white or skimmed milk powder at 3, 6, 15 and 30 mg allergen protein per kg of dessert matrix and evaluated as a quality control material for allergen analysis in a multi-laboratory trial. Analysis was performed by immunoassay using five kits each for egg and milk (based on casein) and six 'other' milk kits (five based on β-lactoglobulin and one total milk). All kits detected allergen protein at the 3 mg kg(-1) level. Based on ISO criteria only one egg kit accurately determined egg protein at 3 mg kg(-1) (p=0.62) and one milk (casein) kit accurately determined milk at 6 (p=0.54) and 15 mg kg(-1) (p=0.83), against the target value. The milk "other" kits performed least well of all the kits assessed, giving the least precise analyses. The incurred dessert material had the characteristics required for a quality control material for allergen analysis.

This article covers challenges and trends in the determination of some major food chemical contaminants and allergens, which-among others-are being monitored by Health Canada's Food Directorate and for which background levels in food and human exposure are being analyzed and calculated. Eleven different contaminants/contaminant groups and allergens have been selected for detailed discussion in this paper. They occur in foods as a result of: use as a food additive or ingredient; processing-induced reactions; food packaging migration; deliberate adulteration; and/or presence as a chemical contaminant or natural toxin in the environment. Examples include acrylamide as a food-processing-induced contaminant, bisphenol A as a food packaging-derived chemical, melamine and related compounds as food adulterants and persistent organic pollutants, and perchlorate as an environmental contaminant. Ochratoxin A, fumonisins, and paralytic shellfish poisoning toxins are examples of naturally occurring toxins whereas sulfites, peanuts, and milk exemplify common allergenic food additives/ingredients. To deal with the increasing number of sample matrices and analytes of interest, two analytical approaches have become increasingly prevalent. The first has been the development of rapid screening methods for a variety of analytes based on immunochemical techniques, utilizing ELISA or surface plasmon resonance technology. The second is the development of highly sophisticated multi-analyte methods based on liquid chromatography coupled with multiple-stage mass spectrometry for identification and simultaneous quantification of a wide range of contaminants, often with much less requirement for tedious cleanup procedures. Whereas rapid screening methods enable testing of large numbers of samples, the multi analyte mass spectrometric methods enable full quantification with confirmation of the analytes of interest. Both approaches are useful when gathering surveillance data to determine occurrence and background levels of both recognized and newly identified contaminants in foods in order to estimate human daily intake for health risk assessment.