cathodes, [10][11][12] silicon-based anodes, [13][14][15][16] and optimizing organic liquid electrolytes. [17,18] However, the safety challenges related to the electrolyte are serious because operation of LIBs is exothermic and organic liquid electrolytes mostly with ester carbonates are highly flammable, generating massive heat. [19,20] Dendritic lithium in LIB represents a further challenge considering internal short circuit would occur if the dendrite punctures the separator. [21,22] Therefore, solutions for safety of LIBs are urgently required.Inorganic ceramic solid-state electrolyte (SSE) provides an ideal alternative to liquid flammable electrolytes for the design of safe ASSBs, since ceramic SSE is nonflammable and it has adequate fracture toughness to prevent internal short circuit from lithium dendrite. [23][24][25] Furthermore, lithium metal anode, the ultimate anode with the highest specific capacity and lowest electrochemical potential has been demonstrated in ASSBs, which exhibited intrinsic safety under rigorous conditions. [26][27][28][29][30] In the search for SSEs, while most of the superionic conductors with conductivity >1 mS cm −1 are based on sulfides, such as Li 10 GeP 2 S 12 , [31,32] Li 9.54 Si 1.74 P 1.44 S 11.7 Cl 0.3 , [33] and Li 9.6 P 3 S 12 , [34] it has shown that garnet-type oxides are the most stable SSEs with lithium metal anode. [35][36][37][38][39] However, the lithium/garnet interface appeared to have a remarkably large impedance due to the poor interfacial contact. [40] This motivates a variety of studies to turn garnet from lithiophobic to lithiophilic by coating garnet with metal, [41][42][43][44] metal oxides, [45,46] semi-conductors, [47,48] polymer interlayers, [49,50] and graphite. [51] Although these approaches have shown great progress, they mainly addressed the interface issue from garnet side. As a result, ample opportunities remain on lithium metal side.Here we introduce a new strategy to synthesize a ceramic compatible lithium anode by using graphite additives. Our scheme to implement a lithium/garnet interface experiment is sketched in Figure 1. We find that pure lithium is not compatible with garnet, which is consistent with that expected for lithiophobic garnet surface and previous reports (Figure 1a). [52] On the other side, lithium-graphite (Li-C) composite presents lower fluidity and higher viscosity compared to pure Li. So the Li-C composite, like a paste, can be casted onto garnet and exhibits an intimate contact (Figure 1b). As expected, All-solid-state batteries (ASSBs) with ceramic-based solid-state electrolytes (SSEs) enable high safety that is inaccessible with conventional lithium-ion batteries. Lithium metal, the ultimate anode with the highest specific capacity, also becomes available with nonflammable SSEs in ASSBs, which offers promising energy density. The rapid development of ASSBs, however, is significantly hampered by the large interfacial resistance as a matched lithium/ ceramic interface that is not easy to pursue. Here, a lithium-graphite...

Solid‐state Li metal batteries (SSLMBs) have attracted considerable interests due to their promising energy density as well as high safety. However, the realization of a well‐matched Li metal/solid‐state electrolyte (SSE) interface remains challenging. Herein, we report g‐C3N4 as a new interface enabler. We discover that introducing g‐C3N4 into Li metal can not only convert the Li metal/garnet‐type SSE interface from point contact to intimate contact but also greatly enhance the capability to suppress the dendritic Li formation because of the greatly enhanced viscosity, decreased surface tension of molten Li, and the in situ formation of Li3N at the interface. Thus, the resulting Li‐C3N4|SSE|Li‐C3N4 symmetric cell gives a significantly low interfacial resistance of 11 Ω cm2 and a high critical current density (CCD) of 1500 μA cm−2. In contrast, the same symmetric cell configuration with pristine Li metal electrodes has a much larger interfacial resistance (428 Ω cm2) and a much lower CCD (50 μA cm−2).

Solid-state Li metal batteries (SSLMBs) have emerged as an important energy storage technology that offers the possibility of both high energy density and safety by combining a Li metal anode...

The use of biocompatible and biodegradable materials in electronic devices can be an important trend in the development of the next-generation green electronics. In addition, by integrating the advantages of low power consumption, low-cost processing, and flexibility, organic synaptic devices will be promising elements for the construction of brain-inspired computers. However, previously reported electrolyte-gated synaptic transistors are mainly made of non-biocompatible and non-biodegradable electrolytes. Woods are widely considered as one kind of sustainable and renewable materials. We found that wood-derived cellulose nanopapers have ionic conductivity and, therefore, can be used as dielectric materials for organic synaptic transistors. The fabricated wood-derived cellulose nanopapers exhibit decent ionic conductivity of 7.3 × 10–4 S m–1 and a high lateral coupling effective capacitance of 18.65 nF cm–2 at 30 Hz. The laterally coupled organic synaptic transistors using wood-derived cellulose nanopapers as the dielectric layer present excellent transistor performances at the operating voltage below 1.5 V. More significantly, some important synaptic behaviors, such as excitatory postsynaptic current, signal-filtering characteristics, and dendritic integration are successfully simulated in our synaptic transistors. Because the development of electronic devices with biocompatible and biodegradable materials is essential, this work may inspire new directions for the development of “green” neuromorphic electronics.

Graphite and lithium metal are two classic anode materials and their composite has shown promising performance for rechargeable batteries. However, it is generally accepted that Li metal wets graphite poorly, causing its spreading and infiltration difficult. Here we show that graphite can either appear superlithiophilic or lithiophobic, depending on the local redox potential. By comparing the wetting performance of highly ordered pyrolytic graphite, porous carbon paper (PCP), lithiated PCP and graphite powder, we demonstrate that the surface contaminants that pin the contact-line motion and cause contact-angle hysteresis have their own electrochemical-stability windows. The surface contaminants can be either removed or reinforced in a time-dependent manner, depending on whether the reducing agents (C6→LiC6) or the oxidizing agents (air, moisture) dominate in the ambient environment, leading to bifurcating dynamics of either superfast or superslow wetting. Our findings enable new fabrication technology for Li–graphite composite with a controllable Li-metal/graphite ratio and present great promise for the mass production of Li-based anodes for use in high-energy-density batteries.

No abstract

Solid‐state Li metal batteries (SSLMBs) have attracted considerable interests due to their promising energy density as well as high safety. However, the realization of a well‐matched Li metal/solid‐state electrolyte (SSE) interface remains challenging. Herein, we report g‐C3N4 as a new interface enabler. We discover that introducing g‐C3N4 into Li metal can not only convert the Li metal/garnet‐type SSE interface from point contact to intimate contact but also greatly enhance the capability to suppress the dendritic Li formation because of the greatly enhanced viscosity, decreased surface tension of molten Li, and the in situ formation of Li3N at the interface. Thus, the resulting Li‐C3N4|SSE|Li‐C3N4 symmetric cell gives a significantly low interfacial resistance of 11 Ω cm2 and a high critical current density (CCD) of 1500 μA cm−2. In contrast, the same symmetric cell configuration with pristine Li metal electrodes has a much larger interfacial resistance (428 Ω cm2) and a much lower CCD (50 μA cm−2).

Scientific and technological interest in solid-state Li metal batteries (SSLMBs) arises from their excellent safety and promising high energy density. However, the practical application of SSLMBs is hindered by poor contact between the Li metal anode (LMA) and solid-state electrolytes (SSEs). To circumvent this limitation, a pattern-guided approach that shapes the LMA/SSE contact is disclosed to offer fast Li ion conduction in the interface. A thermallytreated copper foam is used as the lithophilic pattern to confine and guide Li for forming a tight contact with garnet-type SSE. The contact can be easily manipulated according to the shape of lithiophilic pattern, facilitating cell assembly. The resulting Li|patterned garnet|Li symmetric cell exhibits an interfacial resistance of 9.8 Ω cm 2 , which is dramatically lower than that of 998 Ω cm 2 for Li|pristine garnet|Li symmetric cell. Being used in Li-sulfur batteries, the patterned garnet effectively eliminates the polysulfide shuttle and enables stable cycling performance, showing a low capacity decay of 0.035% per cycle over 1000 cycles. The fundamental contact process of metallic anodes/SSEs is carefully investigated. This contact strategy provides a new design concept to improve the interface wettability via a lithiophilic pattern for a variety of SSEs that cannot wet with metallic anodes.