O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a influência de tratamentos de superfície na resistência de união (RU) entre compósitos e um cimento resinoso. Setenta e cinco discos (10x2 mm) das resinas Filtek P90, Filtek Z250 e Filtek Z350 (3M ESPE) foram divididos em 5 grupos de acordo com o tratamento: N= sem tratamento; S= jateamento com óxido de alumínio (50μm); SE= jateamento de óxido de alumínio + 99,3% de etanol por 5 min; C= jateamento de sílica com Cojet -30 microns (3M ESPE); CS= jateamento de sílica + silano. Tubos de PVC (0,5 x 0,80 mm) foram fixados nos discos e o cimento resinoso (RelyX ARC, 3M ESPE) foi inserido. Após 24 horas de armazenamento em saliva ar tificial a 37oC, os espécimes foram submetidos ao teste de microcisalhamento com velocidade de 1,0 mm/min. Os dados foram avaliados em ANOVA de dois fatores e no teste de Tukey (5%) para contraste. Os resultados mostraram que o tratamento com oxido de alumínio (J) foi eficiente no aumento da RU nos compósitos Filtek Z350 e P90. Não houve diferença entre tratamentos para a Z250. Grupo CS mostrou resultados semelhantes aos do controle para todos os compósitos. Já o SE mostrou os piores resultados de RU. Concluiu-se que os valores de RU foram dependentes do tipo de compósito e do tratamento de superfície utilizado. O jateamento com óxido de alumínio parece ser um tratamento de superfície eficaz e pode elevar os valores de RU, já o uso de etanol pode ser prejudicial.
Summary Masticatory muscle activity during sleep has been considered independent of variations in the structural characteristics of the dental occlusion. However, scientific evidence contradicting an occlusal causal role is missing. The purpose of this study was to test the null hypothesis that sleep bruxism (SB) is independent of the presence of occlusal interferences. A total of 17 healthy female subjects (mean [SD] age 24.9 [4.1] years) presenting with SB, and randomly divided into two groups, were evaluated after receiving either elimination of occlusal interferences (Test group) or elimination of sharp margins without change in occlusal contacts (Control group). Audio‐video polysomnography (PSG) recordings were undertaken before and after treatment (mean [SD] duration 14.4 [3.8] months). Two subjects in each group (< 2 rhythmic masticatory muscle activity [RMMA]/h) were excluded for statistical analysis. During the total sleep time (TST), the Test group exhibited a higher reduction in frequency of episodes per hour than the Control group (p < 0.05). The reduction in duration of episodes was also higher in the Test group during the TST. The Test group presented an increase in sleep stage N3 (p < 0.05) at the final PSG when compared with the initial PSG, and a higher percentage of N3 (p < 0.05) at the final PSG when compared to the Control group. Elimination of occlusal interferences resulted in a significant reduction of masseter and temporal muscle activity during sleep in females presenting with SB. Based on these results, the null hypothesis is rejected. The hypothesis of occlusal interferences as a risk factor for SB is still patent.
Reply,We are grateful for the attention paid by Drs Kato, Lobbezoo, and Lavigne to our article (de Abreu et al., 2023). They rightfully point out methodological aspects calling for caution in interpretation. We agree that the trial suffered from a low number of participants. We also agree that the description of the use of composites for establishing anterior guidance left room for misunderstanding. The composites did not change, let alone eliminate, centric contacts. In the test group, they minimised the amount of enamel that had to be ground for the elimination of postcanine
Rationale: Although bruxism is commonly associated with dental wear, there is no scientific consensus that bruxism alone can be considered an etiological factor of non-carious cervical lesions. In the last two INPLASY 1
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.