The taxonomic status of seven glucose-non-acidifying, non-proteolytic Acinetobacter strains characterized by forming small colonies on agar media was studied. With one exception, all strains were from human specimens. They could be distinguished from all described Acinetobacter (genomic) species by their ability to grow on ethanol and acetate as sole sources of carbon but not on 22 other substrates tested including DL-lactate or DL-4-aminobutyrate. DNA-DNA hybridization studies, 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, amplified rDNA restriction analysis and DNA polymorphism analysis by AFLP showed that these strains represent a hitherto unknown species of the genus Acinetobacter, for which the name Acinetobacter parvus (type strain LMG 21765 T =LUH 4616 T =NIPH 384 T =CCM 7030 T ) is proposed.The genus Acinetobacter comprises non-motile, strictly aerobic, oxidase-negative, Gram-negative bacteria that grow well on simple media. Twenty-four (genomic) species are currently recognized within the genus (Bouvet & Grimont, 1986;Tjernberg & Ursing, 1989;Bouvet & Jeanjean, 1989;Gerner-Smidt & Tjernberg, 1993;Vaneechoutte et al., 1999;Nemec et al., 2001) and strains of these species usually form colonies of 1?0-2?0 mm in diameter after 24 h incubation under optimum growth conditions (Bouvet & Grimont, 1986;Nemec et al., 2001). In a taxonomic study of Acinetobacter clinical isolates (Nemec et al., 2000), two strains were found which formed notably small colonies on routine agar media and could not be identified as any known (genomic) species. These strains were glucose-non-acidifying, non-proteolytic, did not utilize any of the 14 carbon sources of the identification scheme of Bouvet & Grimont (1987) and had highly similar amplified rDNA restriction analysis (ARDRA) profiles. Later, five strains similar to the two strains were found among archive strains in our collections. The aim of the present study was to define the taxonomic status of these strains by a polyphasic analysis.The seven strains used in this study are listed in Table 1. All had the properties of the genus Acinetobacter (Juni, 1984), i.e. they were Gram-negative, strictly aerobic, oxidasenegative, non-motile coccobacilli, and were positive in the transformation assay of Juni (1972). The methods for genotypic characterization included ARDRA, AFLP fingerprinting and comparative 16S rDNA sequence analysis. Phenotypic characterization was done essentially according to Bouvet & Grimont (1987) LMG 19082, which produced large amounts of exopolysaccharides, were subjected to a mild alkaline hydrolysis step before cell lysis, as described by Willems et al. (2001). The G+C content of the DNA was determined by HPLC according to the method of Mesbah et al. (1989). Nonmethylated phage l DNA (Sigma) was used as the calibration reference. DNA-DNA hybridizations were performed using a modification of the microplate method described by Ezaki et al. (1989) and Goris et al. (1998). Hybridizations were performed at 37 uC in a hybridization solution [26 SSC, 56Denhardt's solution, ...