The COVID-19 pandemic has been a disruptive event for cancer patients, especially those with haematological malignancies (HM). They may experience a more severe clinical course due to impaired immune responses. This multi-center retrospective UK audit identified cancer patients who had SARS-CoV-2 infection between 1 March and 10 June 2020 and collected data pertaining to cancer history, COVID-19 presentation and outcomes. In total, 179 patients were identified with a median age of 72 (IQR 61, 81) and follow-up of 44 days (IQR 42, 45). Forty-one percent were female and the overall mortality was 37%. Twenty-nine percent had HM and of these, those treated with chemotherapy in the preceding 28 days to COVID-19 diagnosis had worse outcome compared with solid malignancy (SM): 62% versus 19% died [HR 8.33 (95% CI,, p < 0.001]. Definite or probable nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 transmission accounted for 16% of cases and was associated with increased risk of death (HR 2.47, 95% CI 1.43-4.29, p ¼ 0.001). Patients with haematological malignancies and those who acquire nosocomial transmission are at increased risk of death. Therefore, there is an urgent need to reassess shielding advice, reinforce stringent infection control, and ensure regular patient and staff testing to prevent nosocomial transmission.
Background. Among breast carcinoma patients with metastatic disease, 15-30% will eventually develop brain metastases. We examined the genomic landscape of a large cohort of breast carcinoma brain metastases (BCBMs) and compared them to a cohort of primary breast carcinomas (BCs). Material and Methods. We retrospectively analyzed 733 BCBMs tested with comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) and compared them to 10,772 primary breast carcinomas (not-paired) specimens. For a subset of 16 triplenegative breast carcinoma (TNBC)-brain metastasis (BM) samples, PD-L1 immunohistochemistry was performed concurrently. Results. A total of 733 consecutive BCBMs were analyzed. Compared to primary BCs, BCBMs were enriched for genomic alterations in TP53 (72.0%, 528/733), ERBB2 (25.6%. 188/733), RAD21 (14.1%, 103/733), NF1 (9.0%, 66/733), BRCA1 (7.8%, 57/733), and ESR1 (6.3%,46/733) (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICPI) biomarkers such as tumor mutational burden (TMB)-High (16.2%, 119/733), microsatellite instability (MSI)-High (1.9%, 14/733), CD274 amplification (3.6%, 27/733), and APOBEC mutational signature (5.9%, 43/733) were significantly higher in the BCBM cohort compared to the primary BC cohort (p < 0.05 for all comparisons). When using both CGP and PD-L1 IHC, 37.5% (6/16) of the TNBC brain metastasis patients were eligible for atezolizumab based on PD-L1 IHC, and 18.8% (3/16) were eligible for pembrolizumab based on TMB-High status. Conclusion. We found a high prevalence of clinically relevant genomic alterations in BCBM patients, suggesting that tissue acquisition (surgery) and or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for CGP in addition to CGP of the primary tumor may be clinically warranted. The Oncologist 2021;9999:• •
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.