Introduction The membrane oxygenator in extracorporeal circulation circuits is coated with acrylate-copolymer (ACP) or immobilized heparin (IHP) to enhance hemocompatibility. To evaluate the relative features of both coatings, we compared blood components circulated in the circuits with ACP-and IHP-coated membranes in vitro using whole human blood. Methods Whole human blood was heparinized and circulated in two experimental circuits with an ACP-coated reservoir, tubes, and an ACP- or IHP-coated membrane. Platelet (PLT) counts and the amount of total protein (TP), complement component 3 (C3), and complement component 4 (C4) were measured at 0, 8, 16, 24, and 32 h in each experiment ( n = 5). Results The PLT count at 0-h circulation was lower in the IHP-coated than in the ACP-coated circuits ( p = 0.034); however, no significant difference was observed at other time points. Reduction in TP at 8-h and 16-h circulation and in C3 at 32-h circulation was lesser in the ACP-coated than in the IHP-coated circuits ( p = 0.004, 0.034, and 0.027, respectively); reduction in TP and C3 at other time points and C4 at each time point was not significantly different. There were significant interactions between coating type and circulation duration in the PLT, TP, and C3 transitions ( p = 0.008, 0.020, and 0.043, respectively). Conclusions Our findings suggest that ACP-coated membranes can prevent the initial drop in PLT count and C3 consumption over 32 h, whereas IHP-coated membranes could not prevent this drop in extracorporeal circulation. Therefore, ACP-coated membranes are suitable for short- and long-term extracorporeal life support.

Introduction We performed in vitro experiments using whole human blood without anticoagulants to clarify the activity of anticoagulant proteins on membranes coated with acrylate-copolymer (ACP) with a hydrophilic blood-contacting layer compared to those coated by immobilizing heparin (IHP) in extracorporeal circulation. Methods Whole human blood from healthy volunteers was recirculated in two types of experimental circuits with an ACP-coated reservoir and tubes and an ACP-coated or IHP-coated membrane. To compare the fluctuation of anticoagulant proteins, the circuit pressure at the inlet and outlet of the membrane was measured every 5 min; antithrombin antigen (ATQ), antithrombin activity, protein-C quantitation (PCQ), protein-C activity, protein-S free antigen (PSQ), and protein-S activity were measured at 0, 30, 60, 120, and 180 min in each experiment ( n = 5). Results The time taken to achieve high circuit pressure (> 300 mmHg) at the inlet of the membrane was significantly shorter in the ACP-coated membrane circuit (28 ± 2.7 min) than in the IHP-coated membrane circuit (54 ± 24 min); however, the ATQ, PCQ, and PSQ at 180 min of recirculation were significantly higher in the former than in the latter (all p < .05). Conclusions ACP-coated membranes can prevent the consumption of anticoagulant proteins but cannot delay circuit thrombogenicity compared to IHP-coated membranes. Considering patient care during the post-extracorporeal circulation period, the use of ACP coating, which can preserve anticoagulant protein, is better in extracorporeal circulation circuits.

Objective: Currently, the foreign surfaces of extracorporeal circulation devices are coated with an acrylate-based copolymer that creates a hydrophilic blood-contacting layer to enhance biocompatibility. Several reports of acrylate-based copolymer with respect to biocompatibility have been published; however, the adsorption of peptide compounds on acrylate-based copolymer–coated membranes still requires clarity. In this study, we aimed to understand the adsorption of several peptide compounds of various molecular weights, including albumin, lysozyme, and vancomycin, on acrylate-based copolymer–coated membranes using in vitro studies. Methods: Six experimental circuits consisting of acrylate-based copolymer–coated tubes and membranes, and six comprising acrylate-based copolymer–coated tubes and non-coated membranes were prepared for comparison. An experimental solution, composed of albumin, lysozyme, vancomycin, and saline, was continuously stirred in a reservoir, recirculated in each experimental circuit, and then filtered. Concentrations of albumin, lysozyme, and vancomycin were measured after 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 90, and 120 min of recirculation. Similar experiments were performed in all the prepared circuits. Results: The ratio of measured values at each time point to those at 0 min was not significantly different between acrylate-based copolymer–coated and non-coated membranes for albumin and lysozyme, but differed significantly for vancomycin; the ratios were higher in acrylate-based copolymer–coated than in non-coated membranes. Conclusion: This study suggests that albumin is not adsorbed on either acrylate-based copolymer–coated or non-coated membranes, that lysozyme is not adsorbed on either membrane or is adsorbed at a similar rate on both membranes, and that vancomycin is less adsorbed on acrylate-based copolymer–coated membranes. Thus, acrylate-based copolymer coating could inhibit the adsorption of various peptide compounds.