BackgroundExtracellular vesicles (EVs) and exosomes are nano-sized, membrane-bound vesicles shed by most eukaryotic cells studied to date. EVs play key signaling roles in cellular development, cancer metastasis, immune modulation and tissue regeneration. Attempts to modify exosomes to increase their targeting efficiency to specific tissue types are still in their infancy. Here we describe an EV membrane anchoring platform termed “cloaking” to directly embed tissue-specific antibodies or homing peptides on EV membrane surfaces ex vivo for enhanced vesicle uptake in cells of interest. The cloaking system consists of three components: DMPE phospholipid membrane anchor, polyethylene glycol spacer and a conjugated streptavidin platform molecule, to which any biotinylated molecule can be coupled for EV decoration.ResultsWe demonstrate the utility of membrane surface engineering and biodistribution tracking with this technology along with targeting EVs for enhanced uptake in cardiac fibroblasts, myoblasts and ischemic myocardium using combinations of fluorescent tags, tissue-targeting antibodies and homing peptide surface cloaks. We compare cloaking to a complementary approach, surface display, in which parental cells are engineered to secrete EVs with fusion surface targeting proteins.ConclusionsEV targeting can be enhanced both by cloaking and by surface display; the former entails chemical modification of preformed EVs, while the latter requires genetic modification of the parent cells. Reduction to practice of the cloaking approach, using several different EV surface modifications to target distinct cells and tissues, supports the notion of cloaking as a platform technology.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12951-018-0388-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

An important application of intravascular optical coherence tomography (IVOCT) for atherosclerotic tissue analysis is using it to estimate attenuation and backscatter coefficients. This work aims at exploring the potential of the attenuation coefficient, a proposed backscatter term, and image intensities in distinguishing different atherosclerotic tissue types with a robust implementation of depth-resolved (DR) approach. Therefore, the DR model is introduced to estimate the attenuation coefficient and further extended to estimate the backscatter-related term in IVOCT images, such that values can be estimated per pixel without predefining any delineation for the estimation. In order to exclude noisy regions with a weak signal, an automated algorithm is implemented to determine the cut-off border in IVOCT images. The attenuation coefficient, backscatter term, and the image intensity are further analyzed in regions of interest, which have been delineated referring to their pathology counterparts. Local statistical values were reported and their distributions were further compared with a two-sample t-test to evaluate the potential for distinguishing six types of tissues. Results show that the IVOCT intensity, DR attenuation coefficient, and backscatter term extracted with the reported implementation are complementary to each other on characterizing six tissue types: mixed, calcification, fibrous, lipid-rich, macrophages, and necrotic core.

Hypertension often leads to cardiovascular disease and kidney dysfunction. Exosomes secreted from cardiosphere-derived cells (CDC-exo) and their most abundant small RNA constituent, the Y RNA fragment EV-YF1, exert therapeutic benefits after myocardial infarction. Here, we investigated the effects of CDC-exo and EV-YF1, each administered individually, in a model of cardiac hypertrophy and kidney injury induced by chronic infusion of Ang (angiotensin) II. After 2 weeks of Ang II, multiple doses of CDC-exo or EV-YF1 were administered retro-orbitally. Ang II infusion induced an elevation in systolic blood pressure that was not affected by CDC-exo or EV-YF1. Echocardiography confirmed that Ang II infusion led to cardiac hypertrophy. CDC-exo and EV-YF1 both attenuated cardiac hypertrophy and reduced cardiac inflammation and fibrosis. In addition, both CDC-exo and EV-YF1 improved kidney function and diminished renal inflammation and fibrosis. The beneficial effects of CDC-exo and EV-YF1 were associated with changes in the expression of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL (interleukin)-10 in plasma, heart, spleen, and kidney. In summary, infusions of CDC-exo or EV-YF1 attenuated cardiac hypertrophy and renal injury induced by Ang II infusion, without affecting blood pressure, in association with altered IL-10 expression. Exosomes and their defined noncoding RNA contents may represent potential new therapeutic approaches for hypertension-associated cardiovascular and renal damage.

Background Dialysis is an independent risk factor for in‐stent restenosis (ISR) after stent implantation in coronary arteries. However, the characteristics of ISR in patients undergoing dialysis remain unclear, as there are no histological studies evaluating the causes of this condition. The aim of the present study was to investigate the causes of ISR between patients who are undergoing dialysis and those who are not by evaluating tissues obtained from ISR lesions using directional coronary atherectomy. Methods and Results A total of 29 ISR lesions from 29 patients included in a multicenter directional coronary atherectomy registry of 128 patients were selected for analysis and divided into a dialysis group (n=8) and a nondialysis group (n=21). Histopathological evaluation demonstrated that an in‐stent calcified nodule was a major histological characteristic of ISR lesions in the dialysis group and the prevalence of an in‐stent calcified nodule was significantly higher in the dialysis group compared with the nondialysis group (75% versus 5%, respectively; P <0.01). On the other hand, the prevalence of an in‐stent lipid‐rich plaque was significantly lower in the dialysis group compared with the nondialysis group (0% versus 43%, respectively; P =0.03). In all cases with an in‐stent calcified nodule, the underlying calcification before stent implantation was moderate to severe. When tissue characteristics were stratified according to duration post–stent implantation, an in‐stent calcified nodule in the dialysis group was mainly observed within 1 year after stent implantation. Conclusions In‐stent calcified nodules are a common cause of ISR in patients undergoing dialysis and are observed within 1 year after stent implantation, suggesting different causes of ISR between patients undergoing dialysis and those who are not.

Biodegradable polymer-based drug-eluting stents are thought to be safer than durable polymer-based stents. However, the long-term vascular response remains unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the biocompatibility of durable polymer-based sirolimus-eluting (SES) and everolimus-eluting (EES) stents with biodegradable polymer-based biolimus-eluting (BES) stents in a porcine coronary model. Stents were implanted in porcine coronaries. Acetylcholine challenge tests and optical coherence tomography (OCT) examination were performed at one month. Animals were sacrificed at three and six months (n=6 each), and the stents were analysed histologically. At one month, acetylcholine challenge tests revealed a trend towards greatest vasoconstriction in SES, less in BES, and least in EES, but the differences were not significant. OCT analysis demonstrated the highest incidence of uncovered struts in SES, followed by BES, while EES showed almost complete strut coverage (41.7±27.0%, 24.5±23.8%, 0.4±0.8%, respectively; p=0.004). Upon histological analysis at three months, SES showed a significantly higher inflammatory score than BES and EES (2.9±1.4, 0.8±0.9, 0.5±0.4, respectively; p=0.001), and this was maintained at six months (1.6±1.5, 0.3±0.3, 0.4±0.6, respectively; p=0.049). While SES showed an increased inflammatory reaction, EES and BES showed minimal inflammation. These results indicate that the late inflammatory reaction does not necessarily depend on degradability of the polymer, if the combination of the drug, metal, and polymer is biocompatible.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract