SummaryDiabetes mellitus (DM) is a strong risk factor for cardiovascular (CV) disease. Plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels are elevated in various types of cardiac diseases. Increased plasma BNP levels have been reported to be associated with CV risk in apparently healthy individuals. However, no studies have yet examined the specific value of plasma BNP for predicting CV incidence in unselected DM subjects in a community-based population.In a community-based DM cohort (n = 1,059, mean = 66 years), baseline BNP levels were determined, and CV events were followed and captured prospectively. The cohort was divided by plasma BNP quintiles. The Cox proportional hazard model was used to determine the relative hazard ratios (HR) among the quintiles. In addition, the effects of adding the plasma BNP or urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) to an established CV risk scoring model was examined by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC).During the 5.7 year follow-up period, CV events were identified in 65 of the DM cohort. There was a significant association between plasma BNP levels and CV event rate (P < 0.001). HR was significantly increased in the highest quintile compared to the lowest (HR = 4.38; 95%CI 1.69 -11.84). The AUC generated from ROC analysis of the Framingham risk score for predicting general CV events was improved by adding BNP testing (from 0.66 to 0.74; P = 0.05), but not by adding UACR (from 0.66 to 0.67; P = 0.49).In a community sample of people with DM, plasma BNP levels above the 80 percentile are directly associated with CV risk, and measurement of plasma BNP alone or in conjunction with an established CV risk score is of value in predicting CV events in these subjects. (Int Heart J 2012; 53: 176-181)

SummarySeveral recent studies have suggested that arterial stiffness parameters such as peripheral pulse pressure (PPP), central blood pressure (CBP), and pulse wave velocity (PWV) are more accurate markers than brachial blood pressure for prediction of cardiovascular (CV) events. However, it remains unknown which arterial stiffness parameter is the most useful for predicting CV risk in the general population. Participants in the present study were randomly selected from the 40 to 79 year age group in the general population (n = 973; mean age, 59). PPP was determined in the upper arm with an oscillometric device. CBP was estimated noninvasively by radial pulsatile analysis, and brachial-ankle PWV was measured using a validated automatic device. A follow-up survey assessing the incidence of CV events including CV death was carried out after the baseline study. The mean follow-up duration was 7.8 years. Subjects were divided into quartiles according to PPP, CBP, or PWV. Event-free rates among the PWV quartiles were clearly divergent (P < 0.001); however, the rates among quartiles for the other parameters were not significant. In a multivariate Cox regression model, both the 90th percentile level of PWV (HR = 2.51, 95% CI; 1.21 -5.22: P = 0.014) and the increase in PWV per one standard deviation (HR = 1.42, 95% CI; 1.06 -1.90: P = 0.019) were significantly associated with risk of CV events. The area under the curves of the receiver operating characteristics analysis for CV event prediction of PWV was significantly larger than the others (P = 0.002 versus PPP; P = 0.043 versus systolic CBP). The measurement of brachial-ankle PWV is more useful than determination of PPP or CBP for identifying subjects at high risk of CV events within the general population. (Int Heart J 2013; 54: 160-165) Key words: Blood pressure, Central blood pressure, Pulse pressure, Pulse wave velocity I t has been reported that several types of arterial stiffness parameters are independent predictors apart from brachial blood pressure (BP) levels for cardiovascular (CV) events.1,2) Several previous studies have demonstrated that pulse wave velocity (PWV), peripheral pulse pressure (PPP), and central blood pressure (CBP) are useful for evaluation of arterial stiffness and prediction of CV events and mortality in clinical and screening settings. [3][4][5][6] However, a few studies to date have compared the utility of brachial-ankle PWV (baP-WV), PPP, and CBP for predicting CV risk in communitybased populations. It thus remains uncertain which of the pulsatile hemodynamic measures is the best screening marker for predicting future CV events in the general population. The aim of the present study was to clarify this issue. MethodsSubjects: Subjects were recruited from the general population aged 40 -79 years in Higashiyama district of Ichinoseki city, Iwate prefecture, northern Japan. The total population of the district at the time of baseline survey was 8,425 (men, 4,140; women, 4,285) with 4,651 (men, 2,263; women, 2,388) falling within th...

No abstract

In recent years, there have been several reports on robotic-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention (R-PCI), but few studies have been conducted on R-PCI performed under intravascular imaging guidance. To elucidate the periprocedural and postoperative 30-day outcomes of intravascular imaging-guided R-PCI, we performed a retrospective observational study on all patients in 102 consecutive cases who underwent R-PCI under intravascular imaging guidance at a single center in Japan from June 12, 2019 to February 18, 2021. The primary end point was 30-day survival, and the secondary end point was the incidence of complications. Intravascular imaging-guided R-PCI was performed 110 times in total on 125 lesions. The medians of procedural time, fluoroscopy time, contrast volume, patient entrance skin dose, and radiation exposure to the main operator were 49 min, 16 min, 67 mL, 0.62 Gy, and 0 μSv, respectively. Furthermore, 60.0% of target lesion branches were American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association classification type B2 or type C. However, in all cases, lesion dilatation was successful, and the final Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow grade was 3. The combination of manual operation was required in 12.7% of all cases, but 30-day survival was confirmed in all cases. There were two problems at the puncture site. One small distal branch artery dissection occurred due to manual operation, but no cardiovascular events (myocardial infarction, stroke) occurred and no target lesion restenosis was observed within 30 days of R-PCI. Hence, R-PCI using intravascular imaging demonstrated highly satisfactory treatment outcomes, and no complication caused by robotic operation was observed.

SUMMARYA 17-year-old man underwent clinical evaluation of exercise-induced syncope. Routine exercise stress test did not show any myocardial ischaemic changes or arrhythmias on the ECG recording. However, multidetector CT (MDCT) angiography of the coronary arteries revealed an abnormal origin of the left coronary artery from the right coronary sinus. The participants' symptoms were diagnosed as cardiogenic syncope possibly due to transient stenosis of the left main coronary artery caught between the functionally distended aortic root and the pulmonary trunk during exercise. After successful patch coronary angioplasty, his symptoms disappeared completely even during a similar degree of strenuous exercise. It is important for clinicians not to overlook possible coronary artery anomalies during management of patients with exercise-induced syncope. MDCT coronary angiography may be a useful and non-invasive tool to establish diagnosis and a surgical approach to rectify congenital coronary artery anomalies. BACKGROUND

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract