Concomitant CT offered improved disease control and survival in advanced head and neck cancer patients. Due to increased acute toxicity, more supportive care is demanded when CT is given simultaneously. Increased total treatment time does not exert a negative impact on outcome in this combined modality regimen.

The European Laryngological Society is proposing a classification of different laryngeal endoscopic cordectomies in order to ensure better definitions of post-operative results. We chose to keep the word "cordectomy" even for partial resections because it is the term most often used in the surgical literature. The classification comprises eight types of cordectomies: a subepithelial cordectomy (type I), which is resection of the epithelium; a subligamental cordectomy (type II), which is a resection of the epithelium, Reinke's space and vocal ligament; transmuscular cordectomy (type III), which proceeds through the vocalis muscle; total cordectomy (type IV); extended cordectomy, which encompasses the contralateral vocal fold and the anterior commissure (type Va); extended cordectomy, which includes the arytenoid (type Vb); extended cordectomy, which encompasses the subglottis (type Vc); and extended cordectomy, which includes the ventricle (type Vd). Indications for performing those cordectomies may vary from surgeon to surgeon. The operations are classified according to the surgical approach used and the degree of resection in order to facilitate use of the classification in daily practice. Each surgical procedure ensures that a specimen is available for histopathological examination.

No abstract

Over the past 25 years external rhinoplasty has become increasingly popular. Some rhinosurgeons recommend its use widely, even in routine cases. In our view, however, the classical endonasal approaches remain the first choice. Open rhinoplasty offers an excellent visualization and therefore facility of precise correction, but causes a larger area of wound and scarring. It should, therefore, be restricted to cases of particular difficulties. In the era of minimal invasive surgery, external rhinoplasty advocated as a standard procedure seems to be a drawback, particularly if the aesthetic problem is the leading one. Every facial plastic surgeon should master closed and external rhinoplasty to be able to decide which approach is the most suitable in each situation from the patient's point of view.

No abstract