In the version of this article initially published, the fourth image in Figure 4b was a duplication of the third image. The error has been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.nature medicine volume 16 | number 11 | november 2010 1341 e r r ata

Point mutations are introduced into a mouse rDNA fragment containing the promoter region by a sodium bisulfite method and the mutants are tested for the ability of accurate transcription initiation in vitro. The results indicate that the change, G to A, at -7 completely eliminates the promoter activity, and those at -16 and at -25 decrease it to about 10% and 50%, respectively. On the other hand, the substitutions at +9, +4, -2, -9 and -39 do not alter the template activity significantly. It is concluded that there are limited but distinct nucleotides that are essential for the transcription initiation of this gene. This sort of absolute requirement for single specific bases is not reported in protein coding genes transcribed by RNA polymerase II. We propose that these rigid recognition signals which we have found are the molecular basis for the strong species-dependency of the transcription machinery of RNA polymerase I system. A model is presented in which a transcription factor interacts with the rDNA promoter from one side of the DNA double-helix with essential contacts at these bases.

Mammalian ribosomal DNA (rDNA) transcription has a certain species specificity such that, both in vivo and in vitro, human rDNA cannot be transcribed by mouse machinery and vice versa. This is due to a species-dependent transcription factor, TFID (Y. Mishima, I. Financsek, R. Kominami, and M. Muramatsu, Nucleic Acids Res. 10:6659-6670, 1982). On the basis of the information obtained from 5' and 3' substitution mutants, we prepared a chimeric gene in which the mouse sequence from positions -32 to -14 was inserted into the corresponding location of the human rDNA promoter. The chimeric gene could be transcribed by mouse extracts nearly as efficiently as the wild-type mouse promoter. The chimeric gene could also sequester transcription factor TFID at an efficiency similar to that for the mouse promoter. Partially purified mouse TFID that could not protect the human rDNA promoter against DNase I produced a clear footprint on this chimeric gene that was similar to that on mouse rDNA promoter. The basic structure of the mouse rDNA core promoter is discussed in relation to the interaction with TFID.

We compared the ability of various deletion and substitution mutants of the mouse rRNA gene promoter to bind essential factors required for accurate transcription initiation by RNA polymerase I. Different amounts of a competitor template were first incubated with a mouse cell extract containing the whole complement of factors and RNA polymerase I, and then a tester template was added for the second incubation. Transcription was started by adding nucleoside triphosphates (one labeled), and the accurate transcripts were determined on a gel. The results indicated that the ability of 5' deletion mutants to sequester essential factors decreased almost concurrently with the impairment of in vitro transcription activity, whereas when the promoter sequence was removed from the 3' side, the transcription activity decreased earlier and more drastically than the sequestration ability. Similar, though not identical, results were obtained by preincubation with fraction D separated on a phosphocellulose column, indicating that the major factor which was sequestered was TFID, the species-dependent transcription initiation factor that binds first to the promoter in the initiation reaction (H. Kato, M. Nagamine, R. Kominami, and M. Muramatsu, Mol. Cell. Biol. 6:3418-3427, 1986). Compilation of the data suggests that a region inside the 5' half of the core promoter (-40 to -1) is essential for the binding of TFID. The 3' half of the promoter (-1 to downstream) is not essential for the binding of TFID but is highly important for an efficient transcription initiation. A strong down-mutant with a one-base substitution at -16 (G to A) had a reduced ability to bind to TFID, whereas a null mutant with a single base substitution at -7 (G to A) showed a binding ability similar to that of the wild-type promoter when tested with whole-cell extract. This null mutant, however, could not sequester the TFID well when incubated with fraction D alone, suggesting that the binding of TFID with this mutant is unstable in the absence of another factor(s) present in cell extract. The factor is not TFIA, which binds after TFID, because the addition of fraction A containing TFIA did not cause TFID to bind to the mutant. The availability of different mutants having lesions at different steps of transcription initiation wil provide a powerful tool for the dissection of the initiation reaction of the RNA gene.

We compared the ability of various deletion and substitution mutants of the mouse rRNA gene promoter to bind essential factors required for accurate transcription initiation by RNA polymerase I. Different amounts of a competitor template were first incubated with a mouse cell extract containing the whole complement of factors and RNA polymerase I, and then a tester template was added for the second incubation. Transcription was started by adding nucleoside triphosphates (one labeled), and the accurate transcripts were determined on a gel. The results indicated that the ability of 5' deletion mutants to sequester essential factors decreased almost concurrently with the impairment of in vitro transcription activity, whereas when the promoter sequence was removed from the 3' side, the transcription activity decreased earlier and more drastically than the sequestration ability. Similar, though not identical, results were obtained by preincubation with fraction D separated on a phosphocellulose column, indicating that the major factor which was sequestered was TFID, the species-dependent transcription initiation factor that binds first to the promoter in the initiation reaction (H. Kato, M. Nagamine, R. Kominami, and M. Muramatsu, Mol. Cell. Biol. 6:3418-3427, 1986). Compilation of the data suggests that a region inside the 5' half of the core promoter (-40 to -1) is essential for the binding of TFID. The 3' half of the promoter (-1 to downstream) is not essential for the binding of TFID but is highly important for an efficient transcription initiation. A strong down-mutant with a one-base substitution at -16 (G to A) had a reduced ability to bind to TFID, whereas a null mutant with a single base substitution at -7 (G to A) showed a binding ability similar to that of the wild-type promoter when tested with whole-cell extract. This null mutant, however, could not sequester the TFID well when incubated with fraction D alone, suggesting that the binding of TFID with this mutant is unstable in the absence of another factor(s) present in cell extract. The factor is not TFIA, which binds after TFID, because the addition of fraction A containing TFIA did not cause TFID to bind to the mutant. The availability of different mutants having lesions at different steps of transcription initiation will provide a powerful tool for the dissection of the initiation reaction of the RNA gene.