The serological differentiation of weak D from partial D, D-negative and D-positive is not always unequivocal. Therefore, sequencing of the RHD gene is required in some cases. Very recently, several new differences between RHD and RHCE have been identified which permitted us to design primers close to the exon/intron boundaries of the RHD-exons. We evaluated these primers in 83 D-positive and 18 D-negative blood donors and applied the new method for the characterization of the RHD gene in six individuals with weak D phenotype. The amplification reactions were concordant with serological findings in 100 of 101 donors (99.0%). In one D-positive donor the PCR for exons 2 and 5 gave a negative result, while the sequence of the remaining eight exons was unchanged. By sequencing samples with very weak D serological reactions, we identified weak D type 4.2.2 and weak D type 15, both previously reported to be associated with anti-D-alloimmunization. Consequently, we recommended the selection of D-negative blood in the weak D type 4.2.2 patient, and the provision of Rh prophylaxis for pregnant women with weak D type 15. In summary, a new RHD sequencing method was developed which can be applied if serological reactions are inconclusive.

Objective The aim of the study was to determine the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of noninvasive tests for the fetal rhesus CcEc (RHCE) alleles C, c and E in early pregnancy.Design A prospective clinical trial was carried out to evaluate diagnostic accuracy.Setting Women were recruited at four centres specialising in prenatal diagnosis. Peripheral blood and amniotic fluid samples were obtained and sent to a single laboratory for analysis.Sample A total of 233 tests (46 for C, 87 for c and 100 for E) were performed on 181 specimens obtained from pregnant women at weeks 12 to 28 (median week 16) of gestation.Methods Following automated extraction of fetal DNA from maternal plasma, two different real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) protocols were used for the detection of the C, c and E alleles of RHCE. The results of the PCR were compared with genotyping results for the amniotic fluid.Main outcome measures Failure rate, sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were the main outcome measures.Results Unequivocal results were obtained for all specimens. With the first PCR protocol, the sensitivity was 100% for C, 38% for c and 59% for E. In contrast, with the second protocol, the sensitivity for C, c and E was 100%. The specificity for all assays was found to be between 99% and 100%.Conclusions A highly accurate protocol has been identified for the detection of fetal RHCE alleles in maternal plasma in early pregnancy. This noninvasive approach can be considered as a useful test in the management of pregnancies with anti-c, anti-E or anti-C alloimmunisation.

Anti-Ce caused severe HDN requiring exchange transfusion. This highlights the need for a close follow-up throughout pregnancy if unexpected RBC antibodies are present, to permit the provision of compatible blood in case of a rare antibody.

No abstract