A detailed study was conducted on biological removal of phosphorus by an activated sludge process composed of an anaerobic stage followed by an aerobic stage in order to clarify the role of the anaerobic stage of the process. Two distinctive sludges, one contained approximately 10 percent phosphorus, most of which existed in the form of polyphosphates, and the other contained 1.9 percent phosphorus, were obtained by changing BOD concentration of influent and hydraulic detention time of the process. Although the polyphosphate-containing sludge released phosphorus in proportion to the absorbed BOD at anaerobic conditions, the sludge which did not contain polyphosphates also absorbed an equal amount of BOD at the identical rate without any external sources of oxygen. Both sludges accumulated identical levels of poly-β-hydroxybutyrate within the sludges as the BOD sources were absorbed. These results suggest that the polyphosphate-containing sludges have no advantage over the sludges with no polyphosphates when they uptake BOD in the anaerobic stage.
A pilot plant study on biological removal of phosphorus was conducted over fifteen months to obtain optimum operational conditions and evaluate process performance. The pilot plant was composed of an anaerobic zone followed by an aerobic zone, and had a capacity of treating 100 m3 municipal wastewater per day. In the anaerobic zone, BOD loading rates and BOD to MLSS ratios were found to be important factors. In the aerobic zone, on the other hand, the hydraulic retention time had a significant influence on the phosphorus removal efficiency. For successful removal of phosphorus, a shorter hydraulic retention time in the aerobic zone along with appropriate parameters in the anaerobic zone (BOD loading rate ≦ 2 kg-BOD/kg-MLSS day, BOD to MLSS ratio ≦ 0.1 kg-BOD/kg-MLSS) are essential.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.