Changing regulations to lower disinfectant byproducts in drinking water is forcing utilities to switch disinfection from chlorine to monochloramine. It is generally unknown whether this will impact positively or negatively on the microbiological quality of drinking water. A utility in Florida, using water with relatively high organic carbon levels from deep wells in several wellfields, made the decision to change its disinfection regime from chlorine to chloramine in order to meet the new regulations. To assess the impacts of such a change on the microbiology of its water supplies, it undertook a number of studies before and after the change. In particular, the presence of the opportunistic pathogens Legionella and Mycobacterium, and also the composition of drinking-water biofilms, were examined. A preliminary synthesis and summary of these results are presented here. Legionella species were widely distributed in source waters and in the distribution system when chlorine was the disinfectant. In some samples they seemed to be among the dominant biofilm bacteria. Following the change to monochloramine, legionellae were not detected in the distribution system during several months of survey; however, they remained detectable at point of use, although with less species diversity. A variety of mycobacteria (21 types) were widely distributed in the distribution system when chlorine was the disinfectant, but these seemed to increase in dominance after chloramination was instituted. At point of use, only four species of mycobacteria were detected. Other changes occurring with chloramination included (a) an altered biofilm composition, (b) increased numbers of total coliforms and heterotrophs and (c) nitrification of water storage tanks. The results suggested that consideration should be given to the microbiological effects of changing disinfection regimes in drinking-water and distribution system biofilms.

Legionellae are opportunistic bacterial pathogens causing Legionnaires' disease and Pontiac fever and are ubiquitous in surface waters and in infrastructure to contain or distribute water, including pipes, cooling towers, and whirlpool spas. Infection in community-acquired and nosocomial outbreaks is by exposure to contaminated aerosols. Little is known about the presence of legionellae in groundwater. This study used samples from various locations in the United States and Canada to determine if legionellae could be isolated from water and biofilms derived from groundwaters not known to be under the direct influence of surface water. Of the 114 total samples of water and biofilm tested, 29.1% and 28.2% were positive for Legionella by cultivation and polymerase chain reaction (PCR), respectively. Legionellae were found in both warm and colder groundwaters, with more isolates from samples incubated at 30 degrees C than the 35 degrees C conventional temperature for Legionella isolation. The concentration of Legionella found in the water samples ranged from 10(2) to 10(5) CFU/L and up to 1.2 x 10(2) CFU/cm(2) in the biofilm. The species of Legionella identified included both known pathogenic species and species that have not yet been identified as human pathogens. Millions of people in Canada, and around the world, rely on groundwater as their source for drinking. This study shows that legionellae are widespread in groundwater and have the potential to seed derived water supplies and biofilms in public distribution systems. This further widens the known sphere of Legionella colonization and the implications of its presence for public health.

The natural habitat of Legionella is the water environment. Little is known about their presence in groundwater in spite of the fact that many millions around the globe regularly rely on groundwaters. This pilot study was aimed at evaluating the occurrence of Legionella in groundwater samples (water and biofilms) collected from various sites. Water and biofilm samples from selected groundwater sources were examined for Legionella using culture media (selective and non-selective) and a semi-nested PCR assay. Innovative approaches such as immunomagnetic separation (IMS) in combination with cultivation and flow cytometry were also evaluated. The findings available thus far show that (a) Legionella could be readily recovered from groundwater samples by cultivation even though their numbers showed considerable variations, (b) surprisingly, the PCR methodology was not yet as sensitive as cultivation and (c) flow cytometry was not directly applicable on natural samples because of debris and the high number of heterotrophic associated microflora from which some members were likely to cross-react with the monoclonal antibody used for separation procedures (IMS).

No abstract