The ability to learn motor tasks is important in both healthy and pathological conditions. Measurement tools commonly used to quantify the neurophysiological changes associated with motor training such as transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional magnetic resonance imaging pose some challenges, including safety concerns, utility, and cost. EEG offers an attractive alternative as a quantification tool. Different EEG phenomena, movement-related cortical potentials (MRCPs) and sensorimotor rhythms (event-related desynchronization—ERD, and event-related synchronization—ERS), have been shown to change with motor training, but conflicting results have been reported. The aim of this study was to investigate how the EEG correlates (MRCP and ERD/ERS) from the motor cortex are modulated by short (single session in 14 subjects) and long (six sessions in 18 subjects) motor training. Ninety palmar grasps were performed before and after 1 × 45 (or 6 × 45) min of motor training with the non-dominant hand (laparoscopic surgery simulation). Four channels of EEG were recorded continuously during the experiments. The MRCP and ERD/ERS from the alpha/mu and beta bands were calculated and compared before and after the training. An increase in the MRCP amplitude was observed after a single session of training, and a decrease was observed after six sessions. For the ERD/ERS analysis, a significant change was observed only after the single training session in the beta ERD. In conclusion, the MRCP and ERD change as a result of motor training, but they are subject to a marked intra- and inter-subject variability.
After spinal cord injury (SCI), the reorganization of the neuromuscular system leads to increased antagonist muscles' co-activation-that is, increased antagonist vs. agonist muscles activation ratio-during voluntary contractions. Increased muscle co-activation is supposed to result from reduced cortical influences on spinal mechanisms inhibiting antagonist muscles. The assessment of the residual interactions between cortical and muscles activity with corticomuscular coherence (CMC) in participants with SCI producing different force levels may shed new lights on the regulation of muscle co-activation. To achieve this aim, we compared the net joint torque, the muscle co-activation and the CMC ~ 10 and ~ 20 Hz with both agonist and antagonist muscles in participants with SCI and healthy participants performing actual isometric elbow flexion contractions at three force levels. For all participants, overall CMC and muscle co-activation decreased with the increase in the net joint torque, but only CMC ~ 10 Hz was correlated with muscle co-activation. Participants with SCI had greater muscle co-activation and lower CMC ~ 10 Hz, at the highest force levels. These results emphasize the importance of CMC as a mechanism that could take part in the modulation of muscle co-activation to maintain a specific force level. Lower CMC ~ 10 Hz in SCI participants may reflect the decreased cortical influence on spinal mechanisms, leading to increased muscle co-activation, although plasticity of the corticomuscular coupling seems to be preserved after SCI to modulate the force level. Clinically, the CMC may efficiently evaluate the residual integrity of the neuromuscular system after SCI and the effects of rehabilitation.
Antagonist muscle co-activation is thought to be partially regulated by cortical influences, but direct motor cortex involvement is not fully understood. Corticomuscular coherence (CMC) measures direct functional coupling of the motor cortex and muscles. As antagonist co-activation differs according to training status, comparison of CMC in agonist and antagonist muscles and in strength-trained and endurance-trained individuals may provide in-depth knowledge of cortical implication in antagonist muscle co-activation. Electroencephalographic and electromyographic signals were recorded, while 10 strength-trained and 11 endurance-trained participants performed isometric knee contractions in flexion and extension at various torque levels. CMC magnitude in 13-21 and 21-31 Hz frequency bands was quantified by CMC analysis between Cz electroencephalographic electrode activity and all electromyographic signals. CMC was significant in both 13-21 and 21-31 Hz frequency bands in flexor and extensor muscles regardless of participant group, torque level, and direction of contraction. CMC magnitude decreased more in antagonist than in agonist muscles as torque level increased. Finally, CMC magnitude was higher in strength-trained than in endurance-trained participants. These findings provide experimental evidence that the motor cortex directly regulates both agonist and antagonist muscles. Nevertheless, the mechanisms underlying muscle activation may be specific to their function. Between-group modulation of corticomuscular coherence may result from training-induced adaptation, re-emphasizing that corticomuscular coherence analysis may be efficient in characterizing corticospinal adaptations after long-term muscle specialization.
Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) can be used to induce neural plasticity in the human nervous system by pairing motor cortical activity with relevant afferent feedback, which can be used in neurorehabilitation. The aim of this study was to identify the optimal type or combination of afferent feedback modalities to increase cortical excitability in a BCI training intervention. In three experimental sessions, 12 healthy participants imagined a dorsiflexion that was decoded by a BCI which activated relevant afferent feedback: (1) electrical nerve stimulation (ES) (peroneal nerve—innervating tibialis anterior), (2) passive movement (PM) of the ankle joint, or (3) combined electrical stimulation and passive movement (Comb). The cortical excitability was assessed with transcranial magnetic stimulation determining motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in tibialis anterior before, immediately after and 30 min after the BCI training. Linear mixed regression models were used to assess the changes in MEPs. The three interventions led to a significant (p < 0.05) increase in MEP amplitudes immediately and 30 min after the training. The effect sizes of Comb paradigm were larger than ES and PM, although, these differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). These results indicate that the timing of movement imagery and afferent feedback is the main determinant of induced cortical plasticity whereas the specific type of feedback has a moderate impact. These findings can be important for the translation of such a BCI protocol to the clinical practice where by combining the BCI with the already available equipment cortical plasticity can be effectively induced. The findings in the current study need to be validated in stroke populations.
During isometric contractions, the net joint torque stability is modulated with the force production phases, i.e., increasing (IFP), holding (HFP), and decreasing force (DFP) phases. It was hypothesized that this modulation results from an altered cortical control of agonist and antagonist muscle activations. Eleven healthy participants performed 50 submaximal isometric ankle plantar flexion contractions. The force production phase effect (IFP, HFP and DFP) was assessed on the net joint torque stability, agonist and antagonist muscles activations, cortical activation, and corticomuscular coherence (CMC) with agonist and antagonist muscles. In comparison to HFP, the net joint torque stability, the agonist muscles activation and the CMC with agonist muscles were lower during IFP and even more during DFP. Antagonist muscle activations, cortical activations and CMC with antagonist muscles were higher during HFP than during IFP only. Increased CMC with agonist and antagonist muscles appeared to enhance the fine motor control. At a cortical level, agonist and antagonist muscle activations seemed to be controlled independently according to their muscle function and the phase of force production. Results revealed that CMC was an adequate measure to investigate the cortical regulation of agonist and antagonist muscle activations. This may have potential applications for patients with altered muscle activations.
Objective. Human-computer interfaces (HCI) are potential tools for assisting (movement replacement) and rehabilitating (movement restoration) individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI). HCIs based on electroencephalography (EEG) have limited accuracy and hence control options; this could be improved by exploiting potential residual muscle activity (electromyography, EMG). The study objectives were to determine if combined EEG and EMG improves offline singletrial movement classification. Furthermore, the effect of number of classes and detection latency on the accuracies was investigated. Methods. Ten able-bodied and eight SCI subjects performed elbow flexion/extension at three force levels while EEG and EMG were recorded. Temporal and spectral features were extracted from the EEG and Hudgins time domain features were extracted from the EMG in 1-second time windows. The time window was shifted (200-ms shift) over 5second epochs around the movement onset. Each segment was classified in three scenarios (2, 3 or 7 classes) using linear discriminant analysis. Results. The accuracies obtained with EEG (51.2%) was outperformed by EMG (95.5%) and combined EMG and EEG (96.2%). Immediately after the EMG onset, the accuracies increased and rapidly reached a plateau. High accuracies were obtained for the different number of classes. Conclusion and Significance. EMG was crucial for obtaining high accuracies, and potential residual EMG should be exploited in HCIs to improve the performance. Force proved to be a viable option for SCI subjects with residual EMG to increase the number of classes for HCI control. These findings could assist design considerations of HCIs for SCI individuals.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.