The GPUMCD algorithm showed good agreement against GEANT4 both in the presence and absence of a 1.5 T external magnetic field. The application of 1.5 T magnetic field significantly alters the dose at the interfaces by either increasing or decreasing the dose depending upon the density of the material on either side of the interfaces.

The objective of this study is to measure surface and near-surface dose at entry and exit surfaces in a 1.5 T MR-Linac (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) using optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters (OSLDs). OSLDs were expected to be useful for measuring surface dose in a strong magnetic field because they can be taped to undersides to measure exit dose, and their dose response have been shown to be reasonably insensitive to variations in beam angle, beam energy, and magnetic fields. The surface and near-surface dose at the entry and exit of a 20 cm thick solid water phantom was measured with OSLDs for 5  ×  5, 10  ×  10, and 22  ×  22 cm2 field sizes. The solid water phantom was elevated off the couch top to produce an air gap of 3.7 cm so as to observe the electron return effect (ERE) near the beam exit surface. Measurement depths ranged from surface to 15 mm deep from entry and exit surfaces. The phantom dose distribution was also computed in the Monaco (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) Monte Carlo treatment planning system (TPS). For the 5  ×  5, 10  ×  10, and 22  ×  22 cm2 field sizes the surface dose at depth 0 mm was extrapolated from OSLD measurements to be 10.9%, 12.0%, and 13.5%. The surface entry dose was found to be far less field size-dependent compared to a conventional linac, likely due to a lack of electronic contamination due to the strong magnetic field perpendicular to the beam. The ERE effect was observed in the measurements near the exit surface of the phantom, and was in close agreement with the TPS calculation.

PurposeHypofractionated partial breast irradiation (HPBI) involves treatment to the breast tumor using high doses per fraction. Recent advances in MRI‐Linac solutions have potential in being applied to HPBI due to gains in the soft tissue contrast of MRI; however, there are potentially deleterious effects of the magnetic field on the dose distribution. The purpose of this work is to determine the effects of the magnetic field on the dose distribution for HPBI tumors using a tangential beam arrangement (TAN), 5‐beam intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT).MethodsFive patients who have received HPBI were selected with two patients having bilateral disease resulting in a total of two tumors in this study. Six planning configurations were created using a treatment planning system capable of modeling magnetic field dose effects: TAN, IMRT and VMAT beam geometries, each of these optimized with and without a transverse magnetic field of 1.5 T.ResultsThe heart and lung doses were not statistically significant when comparing plan configurations. The magnetic field had a demonstrated effect on skin dose: for VMAT plans, the skin (defined to a depth of 3 mm) D1cc was elevated by +11% and the V30 by +146%; for IMRT plans, the skin D1cc was increased by +18% and the V30 by +149%. Increasing the number of beam angles (e.g., going from IMRT to VMAT) with the magnetic field on reduced the skin dose.ConclusionThe impact of a magnetic field on HPBI dose distributions was analyzed. The heart and lung doses had clinically negligible effects caused by the magnetic field. The magnetic field increases the skin dose; however, this can be mitigated by increasing the number of beam angles.