Objective To compare the efficacy of abatacept to placebo for giant cell arteritis (GCA). Methods In this multicenter trial, patients with newly-diagnosed or relapsing GCA were treated with abatacept 10 mg/kg IV on days 1, 15, 29, week 8, together with prednisone. At week 12, patients in remission underwent a double-blinded randomization to continue monthly abatacept or switch to placebo. Patients in both study arms received a standardized prednisone taper with discontinuation of prednisone at week 28. Patients remained on their randomized assignment until meeting criteria for early termination or until 12 months after enrollment of the last patient. The primary endpoint was duration of remission (relapse-free survival). Results Forty-nine eligible patients with GCA were enrolled and treated with prednisone and abatacept; forty-one reached the week 12 randomization and underwent a blinded randomization to abatacept or placebo. Prednisone was tapered using a standardized schedule reaching 20 mg daily at week 12 with discontinuation in all patients at week 28. The relapse-free survival at 12 months was 48% for those receiving abatacept and 31% for those receiving placebo (p=0.049). A longer median duration of remission was seen with abatacept (9.9 months) compared to placebo (3.9 months, p=0.023). There was no difference in the frequency or severity of adverse events between treatment arms, including infection. Conclusions In patients with GCA the addition of abatacept to a treatment regimen with prednisone reduced the risk of relapse and was not associated with a higher rate of toxicity compared to prednisone alone.
Objective To compare the efficacy of abatacept to placebo for the treatment of Takayasu’s arteritis (TAK). Methods In this multicenter trial, patients with newly-diagnosed or relapsing TAK were treated with abatacept 10 mg/kg IV on days 1, 15, 29, week 8, together with prednisone. At week 12, patients in remission underwent a double-blinded randomization to continue monthly abatacept or switch to placebo. Patients in both study arms received a standardized prednisone taper, reaching 20 mg daily at week 12 with discontinuation of prednisone at week 28 and remained on their randomized assignment until meeting criteria for early termination or until 12 months after enrollment of the last patient. The primary endpoint was duration of remission (relapse-free survival). Results Thirty-four eligible patients with TAK were enrolled and treated with prednisone and abatacept; 26 reached the week 12 randomization and underwent a blinded randomization to abatacept or placebo. The relapse-free survival at 12 months was 22% for those receiving abatacept and 40% for those receiving placebo (p= 0.853). Treatment with abatacept in patients with TAK enrolled in this study was not associated with a longer median duration of remission (abatacept 5.5 months, placebo 5.7 months). There was no difference in the frequency or severity of adverse events between treatment arms, including infection. Conclusions In patients with TAK the addition of abatacept to a treatment regimen with prednisone did not reduce the risk of relapse.
Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of a 24-week course of abatacept in the treatment of active lupus nephritis. An additional exploratory objective was to assess the potential of abatacept to induce ‘clinical tolerance’, defined as sustained clinical quiescence of lupus nephritis after discontinuation of immunosuppressive therapy. Methods Patients (n=134) with active lupus nephritis were studied in a randomized, double-blind phase II add-on trial in which they received either abatacept or placebo in conjunction with the Euro-Lupus regimen of low-dose cyclophosphamide followed by azathioprine. The primary efficacy outcome was the frequency of complete response (CR) at week 24. Thereafter, patients who met either complete or partial response criteria continued blinded treatment through week 52. During this phase of the study, subjects in the abatacept treatment group who had achieved CR status at week 24 discontinued immunosuppressive therapy other than prednisone (10 mg/d). Results There were no statistically significant differences between groups with respect to the primary outcome or any of the secondary outcomes, including measures of safety. Thirty-three percent of subjects in the treatment group and 31% of subjects in the control group achieved CR status at week 24. Fifty percent of subjects in the treatment group who met CR criteria and therefore discontinued immunosuppressive therapy at week 24 maintained their CR status through week 52. Conclusion The addition of abatacept to a regimen of cyclophosphamide followed by azathioprine did not improve the outcome of lupus nephritis at either 24 or 52 weeks. No worrisome safety signals were encountered.
Background The impact and consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic on people with rheumatic disease are unclear. We developed the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance Patient Experience Survey to assess the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on people with rheumatic disease worldwide.Methods Survey questions were developed by key stakeholder groups and disseminated worldwide through social media, websites, and patient support organisations. Questions included demographics, rheumatic disease diagnosis, COVID-19 diagnosis, adoption of protective behaviours to mitigate COVID-19 exposure, medication access and changes, health-care access and communication with rheumatologists, and changes in employment or schooling. Adults age 18 years and older with inflammatory or autoimmune rheumatic diseases were eligible for inclusion. We included participants with and without a COVID-19 diagnosis. We excluded participants reporting only non-inflammatory rheumatic diseases such as fibromyalgia or osteoarthritis. Findings 12 117 responses to the survey were received between April 3 and May 8, 2020, and of these, 10 407 respondents had included appropriate age data. We included complete responses from 9300 adults with rheumatic disease (mean age 46•1 years; 8375 [90•1%] women, 893 [9•6%] men, and 32 [0•3%] participants who identified as non-binary). 6273 (67•5%) of respondents identified as White, 1565 (16•8%) as Latin American, 198 (2•1%) as Black, 190 (2•0%) as Asian, and 42 (0•5%) as Native American or Aboriginal or First Nation. The most common rheumatic disease diagnoses included rheumatoid arthritis (3636 [39•1%] of 9300), systemic lupus erythematosus (2882 [31•0%]), and Sjögren's syndrome (1290 [13•9%]). Most respondents (6921 [82•0%] of 8441) continued their antirheumatic medications as prescribed. Almost all (9266 [99•7%] of 9297) respondents adopted protective behaviours to limit SARS-CoV-2 exposure. A change in employment status occurred in 2524 (27•1%) of 9300) of respondents, with a 13•6% decrease in the number in full-time employment (from 4066 to 3514).Interpretation People with rheumatic disease maintained therapy and followed public health advice to mitigate the risks of COVID-19. Substantial employment status changes occurred, with potential implications for health-care access, medication affordability, mental health, and rheumatic disease activity.Funding American College of Rheumatology.
The chronic use of glucocorticoids results in osteoporosis. Several sets of guidelines have been published on the management of glucocorticoid induced osteoporosis (GIO). These guidelines vary on their focus and highlight different aspects of the current concepts in the management of GIO. In this current article, we summarize recent guidelines for management of GIO and highlight similarities and differences as well as address some of the controversies generated by these guidelines.
Lupus nephritis (LN) is a chronic and devastating complication of systemic lupus erythematosus. Despite advances in our understanding of LN and the availability of effective therapies, LN remains a difficult clinical problem, and progression to end stage renal disease remains a significant challenge. Though the advent of biologics has revolutionized the treatment of many rheumatological conditions, and several clinical trials of biologics have been conducted in LN, the promise of biologics remains unfulfilled. The experience gained from these initial clinical trials can help tailor approaches in future clinical trials, and the lessons learned can be applied to find a cure for this condition.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.