A complex profile of volatile organic compounds ("VOC"s) emanates from human skin, which is altered by changes in the body's metabolic or hormonal state, the external environment, and the bacterial species colonizing the skin surface. The aim of this study was to compare VOC profiles sampled from chronic leg wounds with those from asymptomatic skin. Five participants with chronic arterial leg ulcers were selected. VOC samples were obtained using polydimethylsilicone membranes ("skin-patch method") and analyzed by gas chromatography-ion trap mass spectrometry. Resultant data were analyzed using multivariate analysis and mass spectral matches were compared against the National Institute of Standards and Technology database. Principal component analysis showed differences in profiles obtained from healthy skin and boundary areas and between profiles from healthy skin and lesion samples (p<0.05). Partial least squares for discriminant analysis gave an average prediction accuracy of 73.3% (p<0.05). Mass spectral matching (verified against microbial swab results) identified unique VOCs associated with each sample area, wound bacterial colonization, and ingested medications. This study showcases a reproducible, robust, noninvasive methodology that is applicable in a clinical setting and may offer a new, hitherto unexplored, class of biochemical markers underpinning the metabolism of chronic wounds.
A thermally-desorbed polydimethylsilicone (PDMS) membrane approach with analysis by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry has been developed and characterised, to enable the VOC arising in, and on skin, from glandular secretions, exogenous materials, products of perfusion from blood, and microbiological metabolites to be sampled in a single procedure. In-vitro studies using a series of volatile fatty acid standards indicated that the recovery efficiency of the technique increased with decreasing volatility; for example, the recovery of hexanoic acid was 3.3 times greater than that for 2-methylpropanoic acid. The relative standard deviation of the methodology decreased with decreasing volatility; RSD = 19% for 2-methylpropanoic acid and RSD = 7% for hexanoic acid. Sampled-mass vs. response relationships were modelled satisfactorily using linear regression analysis with regression coefficients in the range 0.95 to 0.998. In-vivo reproducibility was assessed though the analysis of the responses of 1-dodecane, 3,7-dimethyloct-1-ene, 2-propenoic acid, 2-ethylhexyl ester, 2-ethylhexan-1-ol, butanoic, 2-ethylhexylester, and junipen (1,4-methanoazulene, decahydro-4,8,8-trimethyl-9-methylene-); six compounds selected at random retention times from a GC-MS chromatographic VOC profile of human skin containing several hundred resolved and partially resolved compounds. Five samples were obtained simultaneously from the forearm of a healthy male participant. The in-vivo sample masses were estimated to be in the range 50 pg to 100 ng per sample with observed RSD falling between 15% and 32%; in line with a Horwitz trend. Increasing the sample time from 5 min to 120 min generally resulted in an enrichment of the VOC recovered, and for many VOC substantial increases in sensitivity (x7) were observed over this time range as the PDMS sampling-patch approached equilibrium with the underlying skin. Nevertheless, more volatile components, 2,4,6-trimethylcarbazole for instance, were observed to be lost from the analysis with increasing sample time, in a manner analogous with breakthrough behaviour in adsorbent traps. Finally, a 10 day storage study at 4 degrees C suggested that micro-biological factors were significant in their effect on sample stability. Significant changes (up to x8) were observed in the masses of compounds recovered post storage. These studies confirmed that polydimethylsilicone membrane sampling patches of human skin provide rich and analytical useful data. It is important to note that care in experimental design is needed to avoid sampling artefacts being introduced through sampling selectivity, and/or, sample instability where samples are stored for longer than 24 h at 4 degrees C or higher.
The forehead was studied as a possible sampling site for capturing changes in volatile organic compound (VOC) profiles associated with psychological-stress. Skin-VOCs were sampled with a polydimethylsilicone (PDMS)-coupon and the resulting VOCs were recovered and analysed with two-stage thermal desorption gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.15 young adult volunteers (19 yr to 26 yr) participated in two interventions run in a randomised crossover design. One intervention, termed "Neutral", required the participants to listen to peaceful music, the other, termed a "paced audio serial addition task", required the participants to undertake a series of rapid mental arithmetic calculations in a challenging environment that induced a stress response. Skin-VOC samples were taken during each intervention. The resultant data were processed with dynamic background compensation, deconvolved, and registered to a common retention index scale.The importance of freezing skin patch samplers to -80 o C was determined during the method development phase of this study. The cumulative distribution function of the GC-MS data indicates the possibility that PDMS-coupons are selective towards the lower volatility VOC components in skin. The frequency distribution of the GC-MS data was observed to be approximately log-normal, and on the basis of this study, a further twoorders of magnitude reduction in sensitivity may be required before the complete skin-VOC profile may be characterised.Multi-variate analysis involving Pareto-scaling prior to partial least squares discriminant analysis identified four VOCs with the highest probability of contributing to the variance between the two states, and the responses to these VOCs were modelled with principle components analysis (PCA). Two VOCs, benzoic acid and n-decanoic acid were upregulated (14-and 8-fold respectively) and appear to be PASAT sensitive, with areas under (AUC) their receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves of 0.813 and 0.852 respectively. A xylene isomer and 3-carene were down regulated 75 % and 97% respectively, and found to be predictive of the neutral intervention (ROC AUC values of 0.898 and 0.929 respectively). VOC profiles in skin appear to change with stress either due to increased elimination, elevated bacterial activity, or perhaps increased oxidative pathways.2
Evaluation of published methods reveals that existing methods for saliva sampling do not address the physical-chemical attributes of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). This study describes and presents evidence for adopting in situ sampling of salivary VOCs directly from the oral cavity using a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) based sampler. In vitro studies indicated that the vapour pressure of analytes was a factor in both the recovery of analytes and the precision of the recovery. The highest recoveries were observed for VOCs with the lowest vapour pressures, for example 5-nonanol (vapour pressure (P v ) ¼ 14 Pa) recoveries were approximately 20 times greater than those observed for octane (P v ¼ 1726 Pa). Similarly, relative standard deviations reduced with vapour pressure, with the RSD for 5-nonanol responses observed to be 2.7% when compared to RSD ¼ 26% for octane. Evaluation of VOCs recovered from 6 in vivo samples indicated that VOC concentrations in saliva may follow lognormal distributions; log-normal RSDs falling between 4.4% and 18.2% across the range of volatilities encountered. Increasing sampling time from 1 to 30 minutes indicated that the recovery of VOC into the sampler was affected by interaction between different physical-chemical properties and biogenic flux. A sampling time of 10 min was found to offer an acceptable compromise that enabled a representative sample to be acquired for the widest range of observed VOC behaviours with the sampler. The potential to 'tune' the sampling protocol for targeted analysis based on these factors was also noted. Comparison with passive drool saliva collection revealed up to 10 5 enhancement with reduced variability compared to drooled samples. This approach to in situ saliva sampling appears to have significant analytical utility for studying volatile signatures in humans.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.