No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

17 double heterozygous (DH) breast cancer (BC) patients were identified upon the analysis of 5,391 affected women for recurrent Slavic mutations in BRCA1, CHEK2, NBN/NBS1, ATM, and BLM genes. Double heterozygosity was found for BRCA1 and BLM (4 patients), BRCA1 and CHEK2 (4 patients), CHEK2 and NBS1 (3 patients), BRCA1 and ATM (2 patients), CHEK2 and BLM (2 patients), CHEK2 and ATM (1 patient), and NBS1 and BLM (1 patient). DH BC patients were on average not younger than single mutation carriers and did not have an excess of bilateral BC; an additional non-breast tumor was documented in two BRCA1/BLM DH patients (ovarian cancer and lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma). Loss-of-heterozygosity (LOH) analysis of involved genes was performed in 5 tumors, and revealed a single instance of somatic loss of the wild-type allele (LOH at CHEK2 locus in BRCA1/CHEK2 double heterozygote). Distribution of mutations in patients and controls favors the hypothesis on multiplicative interaction between at least some of the analyzed genes. Other studies on double heterozygosity for BC-predisposing germ-line mutations are reviewed.

One hundred and ninety-five consecutive surgically treated Russian colorectal cancer (CRC) patients were retrospectively analyzed for the presence of mutations in KRAS, NRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA genes as well as for the microsatellite instability status. Comparison between high-resolution melting analysis, co-amplification at lower denaturation temperature PCR, DNA sequencing and allele-specific PCR for the detection of KRAS codon 12/13 mutations revealed that none of these methods alone provided satisfactory results in 100 % of the analyzed cases; this experience supports the use of more than one mutation-detecting technique at least in some circumstances. KRAS codon 12/13 substitutions were detected in 70 (35.9 %) CRC cases. Other mutations in the RAS/RAF genes occurred in 22 (11.3 %) cases and included rare KRAS (n = 6), NRAS (n = 8) and BRAF (n = 8) alterations. 5 BRAF mutations affected codon 600, while the remaining 3 potentially functional substitutions were located in the position 594. Twenty-four (12.3 %) CRC cases carried mutations in the PIK3CA, and 18 of these tumors also contained activating alteration in the RAS/RAF genes (p = 0.007). Only 3 (1.5 %) CRC cases showed high-level microsatellite instability (MSI-H) as determined by a panel of mononucleotide markers. Overall, the distribution of potentially predictive mutations in Russian CRC cases is similar to the one observed in other patient series of European descent. Noticeable occurrence of D594G mutation in BRAF oncogene and low frequency of MSI-H may deserve specific attention.

In a search for new breast cancer (BC) predisposing genes, we performed a whole exome sequencing analysis using six patient samples of familial BC and identified a germline inactivating mutation c.183delG [p. Arg61fs] in an orphan G protein-coupled receptor GPRC5A. An extended case-control study revealed a tenfold enrichment for this mutation in BC patients carrying the 5382insC allele of BRCA1, the major founder mutation in the Russian population, compared to wild-type BRCA1 BC cases [6/117 (5.1%) vs. 8/1578 (0.5%), p 5 0.0002]. In mammary tumors (n 5 60), the mRNA expression of GPRC5A significantly correlated with that of BRCA1 (p 5 0.00018). In addition, the amount of GPRC5A transcript was significantly lower in BC obtained from BRCA1 mutation carriers (n 5 17) compared to noncarriers (n 5 93) (p 5 0.026). Accordingly, a siRNA-mediated knockdown of either BRCA1 or GPRC5A in the MDA-MB-231 human BC cell line reduced expression of GPRC5A or BRCA1, respectively. Knockdown of GPRC5A also attenuated radiation-induced BRCA1-and RAD51-containing nuclear DNA repair foci. Taken together, these data suggest that GPRC5A is a modifier of BC risk in BRCA1 mutation carriers and reveals a functional interaction of these genes.Recent advances in DNA sequencing technologies have revolutionized genetic research. Applying a whole genome or exome sequencing to compare affected and nonaffected individuals within large pedigrees promises a rapid identification of causative genes for diseases demonstrating a clear Mendelian inheritance pattern.

No abstract

Biological causes of distinct age- and gender-related distribution of EGFR mutations in LC deserve further investigation.