Introduction. A 59-year-old male patient with dissection of the thoracic aorta, DeBakey I, Stanford A is presented in this case study. We present his symptoms, his preoperative condition, diagnostic procedures, the surgical procedure and his postoperative treatment at the UC of State Cardiosurgery-Skopje. Case report. The surgery was performed two days after establishment of the diagnosis and more than 3 days (72 hours) after the symptoms occured, due to absence of patient’s consent for the surgery. This resulted in more difficult preoperative condition of the patient, surgical procedure harder to perform, and reduced survival expectations. Preoperative risk of predicted mortality from the cardiovascular surgery calculated according to EUROSCORE was 28.6%. Results. In this case study we also present classification, etiology, pathophysiology, and some statistics about the incidence of thoracic aorta dissection and survival rates emphasizing the increased mortality rate in delayed surgical interventions.
Abstract:Background -Despite advances in surgical techniques, still tendency for waiting up to 6 weeks after myocardial infarction with ST segment elevation (STEMI). We aimed to evaluate optimal timing for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) in stable patients with STEMI. Material and Methods -Prospective, randomised study consisted of 30 patients with STEMI (age 57-78 years, 22 male) underwent onpump CABG. According to the timing of CABG they were stratified as urgent (0-2 day) and late group (3 day and after). Transthoracic echocardiography and selective coronarography were done before surgery. Patients with ejection ftaction (EF) >50%, left main stenosis and/or multivessel coronary disease were included in the study. We excluded patients with mechanical complications, reduced EF, cerebrrovacular insult (CVI), renal failure or respiratory insufficiency. Results -The primary endpoint for 30 days were adverse cardiac events (death, recurrent angina, prolonged mechanical ventilation/IABP insertion CVI, acute kidney injury, major bleeding). Eight (26.6%) patients underwent urgent CABG in first 48 h. due to haemodynamic instability/ongoing ischemia Three (37.5%) of them died and 6 (75%) had prolonged mechanical ventilation support and/or IABP. Twenty two (73.3%) patients in late group were operated after period of stabilization (10-14 day). They were discharged on 6-7 postoperative day. Conclusion -Early surgery may be risky, but its delay also carries the risk of devastating complications. Stable patients operated on 10-14 day had similar outcomes as elective cases.Keywords: acute myocardial infarction with ST elevation, coronary artery bypass graft, intraaortic balloon pump, mechanical ventilation Correspondence to Dr Slavica Mitrovska. Address: Dzole Stojcev br. 1-2/8, 1000 Skopje, Macedonia. E-mail: mitrovska2000@yahoo.com. IntroductionThe myocardial infarction (MI) is the leading cause for death in industrial as well as in the developing countries. Contemporary non-surgical procedures, fibrinolytic therapy and primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute myocardial infarction with ST segment elevation (STEMI), significantly reduce morbidity and mortality. Early surgical revascularization, coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), is reserved for left main and/or 3 vessel coronary disease, ongoing ischemia after successful or not PCI, coronary anatomy not adequate for PCI and mechanical complications of STEMI [1].There was a trend in the early 70-ties for an urgent CABG in the patients with acute MI. But, retrospective studies showed an enormous mortality rate in comparison to elective surgery. The end of the 80-ties hypothesized the risk of hemorrhagic transformation from reperfusion and infarct extension, altered recovery and scar formation. Soon after, was introduced the practice to operate patients after 6 weeks of MI with Q wave. But after all these years, the optimal timing of CABG in hemodynamically stable STEMI patients remains controversial.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.