The purpose of this study was to retrospectively review the clinical characteristics and outcomes of a series of women with Paget's disease of the vulva. A retrospective review was performed of 89 women with Paget's disease of the vulva evaluated at a single institution between 1966 and 2010. Medical records were reviewed for demographic information, clinical data, pathologic findings, treatment modalities and outcomes. We found that the primary treatment was surgery for 74 (83.1%) patients, with positive margins noted in 70.1% of cases. Five patients (5.6%) underwent topical treatment with imiquimod and/or 5-fluorouracil, one patient (1.1%) underwent laser ablation and treatment was unknown in 9 patients (10.1%). The majority of patients had multiple recurrences, with 18% having four or more recurrences. There were no significant differences in recurrence rates between patients who underwent surgery and those who did not. Furthermore, there was no association between positive margins following primary surgery and recurrence. Forty-one patients (46.1%) were diagnosed with 53 synchronous or metachronous cancers. Seven patients (7.9%) were found to have invasive vulvar cancer with 1 mm or more depth of invasion, but none of the patients died of Paget's disease or associated vulvar/vaginal cancer. Our findings suggest that the majority of patients with Paget's disease of the vulva develop multiple recurrences regardless of treatment modality or margin status. Alternatives to surgery are needed to better care for women with this disease.

Our results suggest a higher prevalence of HPV infection in pregnant vs. non-pregnant women. This finding may be related to the relative immunosuppression observed in pregnant women, outlining the importance of the appropriate monitoring of the viral infection in this specific population.

Lynch syndrome is an autosomal dominant cancer predisposition syndrome caused by germline mutations in one of the mismatch repair (MMR) genes: MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2. Clinically, Lynch syndrome is characterized by early onset (45 years) of colorectal cancer (CRC), as well as extra-colonic cancer. Male and female carriers of Lynch syndrome-associated mutations have different lifetime risks for CRC and in women endometrial cancer (EC) may be the most common tumor. Whenever Amsterdam criteria are not fulfilled, the currently recommended laboratory screening strategies involve microsatellite instability testing and immunohistochemistry staining of the tumor for the major MMR proteins. The aim of this study was to estimate the frequency of MMR deficiencies in women diagnosed with EC who are at-risk for Lynch syndrome. Thirty women diagnosed with EC under the age of 50 years and/or women with EC and a first degree relative diagnosed with a Lynch syndrome-associated tumor were included. To assess MMR deficiencies four methods were used: multiplex PCR, Single Strand Conformation Polymorphism, Immunohistochemistry and Methylation Specific-Multiplex Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification. Twelve (40%) patients with EC fulfilling one of the inclusion criteria had results indicative of MMR deficiency. The identification of 5 women with clear evidence of MMR deficiency and absence of either Amsterdam or Bethesda criteria among 10 diagnosed with EC under the age of 50 years reinforces previous suggestions by some authors that these women should be considered at risk and always screened for Lynch syndrome after informed consent.

The expression of steroid receptors in the endometrium was high in our series. All cases of endometrial polyps were ER positive. Estrogen receptors may play a major role in the development of endometrial polyps in postmenopausal women taking tamoxifen. Although most histological findings were benign, 22.5% were atrophic.

Background Approximately 70% of cancer‐related deaths occur in low‐ and middle‐income countries. In addition to social and racial inequalities, treatment options in these countries are usually limited because of the lack of trained staff and equipment, limited patient access to health services, and a small number of clinical guidelines. Objectives The Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology developed this guideline to address these barriers and guide physicians treating patients with endometrial cancer (EC) in regions with limited resources and few specialized centers. Methods The guideline was prepared from 10 January to 25 October 20192019 by a multidisciplinary team of 56 experts to discuss the main obstacles faced by EC patients in Brazil. Thirteen questions considered critical to the surgical treatment of these patients were defined. The questions were assigned to groups that reviewed the literature and drafted preliminary recommendations. Following a review by the coordinators and a second review by all participants, the groups made final adjustments for presentations in meetings, classified the level of evidence, and voted on the recommendations. Results For all questions including staging, fertility spearing treatment, genetic testing, sentinel lymph node use, surgical treatment, and other clinical relevant questions, major agreement was achieved by the participants, always using accessible alternatives. Conclusions It is possible to provide adequate treatment for most EC patients in resource‐limited areas, but the first option should be referral to specialized centers with more resources.

No abstract

Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology consensus for surgery in epithelial ovarian cancer patients.

Objective Several controversies remain on conservative management of cervical cancer. Our aim was to develop a consensus recommendation on important and novel topics of fertility‐sparing treatment of cervical cancer. Methods The consensus was sponsored by the Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology (BSSO) from March 2020 to September 2020 and included a multidisciplinary team of 55 specialists. A total of 21 questions were addressed and they were assigned to specialists' groups that reviewed the literature and drafted preliminary recommendations. Further, the coordinators evaluated the recommendations that were classified by the level of evidence, and finally, they were voted by all participants. Results The questions included controversial topics on tumor assessment, surgical treatment, and surveillance in conservative management of cervical cancer. The two topics with lower agreement rates were the role of minimally invasive approach in radical trachelectomy and parametrial preservation. Additionally, only three recommendations had <90% of agreement (fertility preservation in Stage Ib2, anti‐stenosis device, and uterine transposition). Conclusions As very few clinical trials have been developed in surgery for cervical cancer, most recommendations were supported by low levels of evidence. We addressed important and novel topics in conservative management of cervical cancer and our study may contribute to literature.