No abstract

Knowledge of the anatomical organization of the hamstring muscles is necessary to understand their functions, and to assist in the development of accurate clinical and biomechanical models. The hamstring muscles were examined by dissection in six embalmed human lower limbs with the purpose of clarifying their gross morphology. In addition to obtaining evidence for or against anatomical partitioning (as based on muscle architecture and pattern of innervation), data pertaining to architectural parameters such as fascicular length, volume, physiological cross-sectional area, and tendon length were collected. For each muscle, relatively consistent patterns of innervation were identified between specimens, and each was unique with respect to anatomical organization. On the basis of muscle architecture, three regions were identified within semimembranosus. However, this was not completely congruent with the pattern of innervation, as a primary nerve branch supplied only two regions, with the third region receiving a secondary branch. Semitendinosus comprised two distinct partitions arranged in series that were divided by a tendinous inscription. A singular muscle nerve or a primary nerve branch innervated each partition. In the biceps femoris long head the two regions were supplied via a primary nerve branch which divided into two primary branches or split into a series of branches. Being the only muscle to cross a single joint, biceps femoris short head consisted of two distinct regions demarcated by fiber direction, with each innervated by a separate muscle nerve. Architecturally, each muscle differed with respect to parameters such as physiological cross-sectional area, fascicular length and volume, but generally all partitions within an individual muscle were similar in fascicular length. The long proximal and distal tendons of these muscles extended into the muscle bellies thereby forming elongated musculotendinous junctions.

Spinal cord injury has been recognized as a complication of cervical transforaminal injections, but the mechanism of injury is uncertain. In the course of a transforaminal injection, an observation was made after the initial injection of contrast medium. The contrast medium filled a radicular artery that passed to the spinal cord. The procedure was summarily abandoned, and the patient suffered no ill effects. This case demonstrates that despite using careful and accurate technique, it is possible for material to be injected into a radicular artery. Consequently, inadvertent injection of corticosteroids into a radicular artery may be the mechanism for spinal cord injury following transforaminal injections. This observation warns operators to always perform a test injection of contrast medium, and carefully check for arterial filling using real-time fluoroscopy with digital subtraction.

If electrodes are placed parallel to the target nerve, the lesions made can be expected to encompass the target nerves. If electrodes are placed perpendicular to the nerve, the nerve may escape coagulation, or be only partially coagulated. Placing the electrode parallel to the nerve has a demonstrated anatomical basis, and has been vindicated clinically. Other techniques lack such a basis, and have not been vindicated clinically. Suboptimal techniques may underlie suboptimal outcomes from lumbar medial branch neurotomy.

No abstract