Lumbar medial branch neurotomy is an effective means of reducing pain in patients carefully selected on the basis of controlled diagnostic blocks. Adequate coagulation of the target nerves can be achieved by carefully placing the electrode in correct position as judged radiologically. Electrical stimulation before lesioning is superfluous in assuring correct placement of the electrode.

Sacroiliac joint pain is resistant to identification by the historical and physical examination data from tests evaluated in this study.

No abstract

A B S T R A C TBackground. Spinal intervention procedures are widely practiced. Complications are sometimes described in case reports, but the full spectrum of possible complications has not been comprehensively publicized. The fact that certain complications continue to occur suggests that practitioners may not be fully aware of the nature of possible complications and how to recognize warning signs.Objectives. To highlight the nature of potential complications of spine interventions and to assist practitioners in recognizing warning signs of impending complications so that they might be prevented.Methods. Complications described in the literature and encountered by the authors in medicolegal proceedings were identified. Illustrations of such complications were collated together with illustrations of phenomena that might have led to complications had they not been recognized and the procedure appropriately corrected or abandoned.Results. Infection is a risk common to all invasive procedures. Spinal cord injuries have occurred during cervical medial branch blocks, intra-articular injections, and radiofrequency neurotomy because operators did not obtain correct views of the target region and misdirected their needles or electrodes. Similar errors have occurred in the conduct of lumbar blocks and neurotomy. The complications of lumbar intradiscal procedures include infection, injury to a ventral ramus, and breakage of electrodes. Cervical discography, additionally, can be complicated by spinal cord injury. Cervical transforaminal injections have been complicated by injections into a reinforcing radicular artery or the vertebral artery. Lumbar transforaminal injections have been complicated by intraarterial injections and subdural or intrathecal injections. Epidural injections can be complicated by subdural or intrathecal injections, or venous puncture resulting in a haematoma. Intra-articular injections of the lateral atlantoaxial joint and sacroiliac joint theoretically could be complicated by injury to adjacent vessels, nerves, or viscera.Discussion. Strict adherence to published guidelines provides safeguards against encountering complications. Complications are avoided by operators knowing all the relevant anatomy of the procedure and being able to recognize aberrations in the procedure as soon as they occur.

Spinal cord injury has been recognized as a complication of cervical transforaminal injections, but the mechanism of injury is uncertain. In the course of a transforaminal injection, an observation was made after the initial injection of contrast medium. The contrast medium filled a radicular artery that passed to the spinal cord. The procedure was summarily abandoned, and the patient suffered no ill effects. This case demonstrates that despite using careful and accurate technique, it is possible for material to be injected into a radicular artery. Consequently, inadvertent injection of corticosteroids into a radicular artery may be the mechanism for spinal cord injury following transforaminal injections. This observation warns operators to always perform a test injection of contrast medium, and carefully check for arterial filling using real-time fluoroscopy with digital subtraction.

A sensory stimulation-guided approach toward the identification and subsequent radiofrequency thermocoagulation of symptomatic sacral lateral branch nerves appears to offer significant therapeutic advantages over existing therapies for the treatment of chronic sacroiliac joint complex pain.

When the appropriate technique is used, medial branch blocks are target specific. To guard against false-negative responses due to intravenous up-take, contrast medium must be used before the injection of local anaesthetic.

There was a significant effect of 2% lidocaine (versus saline) medial branch injections on anesthetization of the zygapophysial joint when venous uptake was avoided during these injections. When properly performed, lumbar medial branch blocks successfully inhibit pain associated with capsular distention of the lumbar zygapophysial joints at a rate of 89%.