IMPORTANCE Fungal contamination and infection from donor tissues processed for endothelial keratoplasty is a growing concern, prompting analysis of donor tissues after processing.OBJECTIVE To determine whether eyebank-processed endothelial keratoplasty tissue is at higher risk of contamination than unprocessed tissue and to model eyebank processing with regard to room temperature exposure on Candida growth in optisol-gentamicin and streptomycin (GS) with and without antifungal supplementation. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS An examination of the 2013 Eversight Eyebank Study follow-up database for risk factors associated with post-keratoplasty infection identified an increased risk of positive fungal rim culture results in tissue processed for endothelial keratoplasty vs unprocessed tissue. Processing steps at room temperature were hypothesized as a potential risk factor for promotion of fungal growth between these 2 processes. Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, and Candida parapsilosis endophthalmitis isolates were each inoculated into optisol-GS and subjected to 2 different room temperature incubation regimens reflective of current corneal tissue handling protocols. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESEversight Eyebank Study outcomes and measures were follow-up inquiries from 6592 corneal transplants. Efficacy study outcomes and measures were fungal colony-forming units from inoculated vials of optisol-GS taken at 2 different processing temperatures.RESULTS Donor rim culture results were 3 times more likely to be positive for fungi in endothelial keratoplasty-processed eyes (1.14%) than for other uses (0.37%) (difference, 0.77%; 95% CI, 0.17-.1.37) (P = .009). In vitro, increased room temperature incubation of optisol-GS increased growth of Candida species over time. The addition of caspofungin and voriconazole decreased growth of Candida in a species-dependent manner.CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Detectable Candida growth in donor rim cultures, associated with a higher rate of post keratoplasty infection, is seen in endothelial keratoplasty tissue vs other uses at the time of transplantation, likely owing in part to eyebank preparation processes extending the time of tissue warming. Reduced room temperature incubation and the addition of antifungal agents decreased growth of Candida species in optisol-GS and should be further explored to reduce the risk of infection.

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.

Purpose: To determine the cost-effectiveness of amphotericin B supplementation, we analyzed both current costs to treat postendothelial keratoplasty (EK) fungal infections and potential costs associated with amphotericin B supplementation. Methods: We collected 19 US cases of post-EK fungal eye infections from the published literature and assessed the associated costs from the literature. A survey of surgeons was also conducted with questions regarding their experiences in managing these infections. Results: We estimated that the costs to diagnose, manage, and treat post-EK fungal keratitis and post-EK fungal endophthalmitis are USD $21,113 and $34,850, respectively. The largest portion of the costs can be attributed to the need for additional surgical management, which is required in 79% of the cases. We estimated the total cost of amphotericin B supplementation to be $44.39 per graft with use of conventional amphotericin B and conservative assumptions regarding supplementation processes. Cost-effectiveness analysis demonstrated that amphotericin B supplementation is cost-effective at $100,000 per quality-adjusted life-year level only if amphotericin B supplementation can prevent more than 69.62% of post-EK fungal infections, assuming the incidence of post-EK fungal infection remains at the level it was between 2012 and 2017. Conclusions: We found that amphotericin B supplementation can be cost-effective under conservative assumptions if it is moderately effective in preventing post-EK fungal infections.

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.

Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text.