Automatic tube current modulation (ATCM) on CT scanners can yield significant reductions in patient doses. Modulation is based on x-ray beam attenuation in body tissues obtained from scan projection radiographs (SPRs) and aims to maintain the same level of image quality throughout a scan. Noise level is important in judging image quality, but tissues in larger patients exhibit higher contrast resulting from the presence of fat. CT scanner manufacturers use different metrics to assess image quality. Some employ a simple measure of image noise, while others adopt a measure related to a reference image that accepts higher noise levels in more attenuating parts with higher contrast. At the present time there is no standard method for testing ATCM. This paper reviews the operation of different ATCM systems, considers options for testing, and sets out a framework that could be used for optimizing clinical protocols. If dose and image quality can be established for a reference phantom, the modulation performed by ATCM systems can be characterised using anatomical phantoms or geometrical elliptical phantoms which may be conical or include sections of varying dimension. For scanners using a reference image or mAs, selection of the image quality reference determines other factors. However, for scanners using a noise reference, a higher noise level should be selected for larger patients to avoid high doses, and the operator should ensure that appropriate limits are set for mA modulation. Other factors that need to be considered include the SPRs used to plan the ATCM and image thickness. Users should be aware of the mode of operation of the ATCM system on their CT scanner, and be familiar with the effects of changing different protocol parameters. The behaviour of ATCM systems should be established through testing of each CT scanner with suitable phantoms during commissioning.

Modern CT scanners modulate tube current during scans according to patient size, shape and attenuation. However, the ATCM (automatic tube current modulation) systems for different CT manufacturers work on different principles. Although the systems are used for the majority of patients and examinations, there is no standard phantom for routine quality control of CT scanner ATCM operation. The ideal phantom for testing these systems should be capable of evaluating how tube current and image quality as well as dose vary according to changes in patient size and shape. For this study, a conical phantom designed by ImPACT has been compared with two phantoms made from elliptical sections with varying dimensions. The concept of the designs is to reflect the ATCM performance for the varying shapes and dimensions along the length of the human body. The first phantom comprises five elliptical sections with a wide range of different dimensions and the second has three sections that are more similar in size. The phantoms have been used to test ATCM systems for Philips, Siemens, GE and Toshiba scanners. Although the results of the tube current modulation patterns were similar for all CT scanners, the abrupt changes in attenuation for the first sectional phantom provoked an abnormal ATCM response for the GE and Toshiba scanners. The second sectional phantom was developed from the results of the first, and was more effective for ATCM system testing and could be used for dose and image quality assessment in standard positions. However, the ImPACT conical phantom provided the best overall assessment of performance in terms of tube current modulations and noise pattern.

Variation in the user selected CT scanning parameters under automatic tube current modulation (ATCM) between hospitals has a substantial influence on the radiation doses and image quality for patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of changing image reconstruction filter and scan parameter settings on tube current, dose and image quality for various CT scanners operating under ATCM. The scan parameters varied were pitch factor, rotation time, collimator configuration, kVp, image thickness and image filter convolution (FC) used for reconstruction. The Toshiba scanner varies the tube current to achieve a set target noise. Changes in the FC setting and image thickness for the first reconstruction were the major factors affecting patient dose. A two-step change in FC from smoother to sharper filters doubles the dose, but is counterbalanced by an improvement in spatial resolution. In contrast, Philips and Siemens scanners maintained tube current values similar to those for a reference image and patient, and the tube current only varied slightly for changes in individual CT scan parameters. The selection of a sharp filter increased the image noise, while use of iDose iterative reconstruction reduced the noise. Since the principles used by CT manufacturers for ATCM vary, it is important that parameters which affect patient dose and image quality for each scanner are made clear to operator to aid in optimisation.