The NCCN Guidelines for Kidney Cancer focus on the screening, diagnosis, staging, treatment, and management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Patients with relapsed or stage IV RCC typically undergo surgery and/or receive systemic therapy. Tumor histology and risk stratification of patients is important in therapy selection. The NCCN Guidelines for Kidney Cancer stratify treatment recommendations by histology; recommendations for first-line treatment of ccRCC are also stratified by risk group. To further guide management of advanced RCC, the NCCN Kidney Cancer Panel has categorized all systemic kidney cancer therapy regimens as “Preferred,” “Other Recommended Regimens,” or “Useful in Certain Circumstances.” This categorization provides guidance on treatment selection by considering the efficacy, safety, evidence, and other factors that play a role in treatment selection. These factors include pre-existing comorbidities, nature of the disease, and in some cases consideration of access to agents. This article summarizes surgical and systemic therapy recommendations for patients with relapsed or stage IV RCC.

The NCCN Guidelines for Kidney Cancer provide multidisciplinary recommendations for diagnostic workup, staging, and treatment of patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on recent updates to the guidelines, including changes to certain systemic therapy recommendations for patients with relapsed or stage IV RCC. They also discuss the addition of a new section to the guidelines that identifies and describes the most common hereditary RCC syndromes and provides recommendations for genetic testing, surveillance, and/or treatment options for patients who are suspected or confirmed to have one of these syndromes.

'Reverse-phase' protein lysate microarray (RPA) assays use micro-scale, cell lysate dot blots that are printed to a substrate, followed by quantitative immunochemical protein detection, known to be particularly effective across many samples. Large-scale sample collection is a labor-intensive and time-consuming process; the information yielded from RPA assays, however, provides unique opportunities to experimentally interpret theoretical protein networks quantitatively. When specific antibodies are used, RPA can generate 1,000 times more data points using 10,000 times less sample volume than an ordinary western blot, enabling researchers to monitor quantitative proteomic responses for various time-scale and input-dose gradients simultaneously. Hence, the RPA system can be an excellent method for experimental validation of theoretical protein network models. Besides the initial screening of primary antibodies, collection of several hundreds of sample lysates from 1- to 8-h periods can be completed in approximately 10 d; subsequent RPA printing and signal detection steps require an additional 2-3 d.

Atezolizumab (Tecentriq, MPDL3280A; Genentech/Roche) is an FcγR binding-deficient, fully humanized IgG1 mAb designed to interfere with the binding of PD-L1 ligand to its two receptors, PD-1 and B7.1. By blocking the PD-L1/PD-1 immune checkpoint, atezolizumab reduces immunosuppressive signals found within the tumor microenvironment and, consequently, increases T-cell-mediated immunity against the tumor. Atezolizumab has been FDA approved as second-line therapy for advanced bladder cancer. This accelerated approval was based on phase II trial data in patients with metastatic bladder cancer that showed unexpected and durable tumor responses. In subjects whose tumors progressed on first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, the objective response rate was 15%, the complete response rate was 5%, and 1-year overall survival was 36%. In subjects that were chemotherapy naïve and cisplatin ineligible, the objective response rate was 24%, the complete response rate was 7%, and 1-year overall survival was 57%. Better responses were associated with higher PD-L1 expression on the tumor-infiltrating leukocytes. These data suggest that patients with advanced bladder cancer treated with atezolizumab have significantly better response rates and survival than historical controls treated with other second-line regimens. The toxicity profile of atezolizumab is also favorable. Trials are currently assessing whether atezolizumab is effective in earlier bladder cancer stages and in the first-line metastatic setting. .

PURPOSE To evaluate the safety and efficacy of gemcitabine and cisplatin in combination with the immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab as neoadjuvant therapy before radical cystectomy (RC) in muscle-invasive bladder cancer. METHODS Patients with clinical T2-4aN0/XM0 muscle-invasive bladder cancer eligible for RC were enrolled. The initial six patients received lead-in pembrolizumab 200 mg once 2 weeks prior to pembrolizumab 200 mg once on day 1, cisplatin 70 mg/m2 once on day 1, and gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 once on days 1 and 8 every 21 days for four cycles. This schedule was discontinued for toxicity and subsequent patients received cisplatin 35 mg/m2 once on days 1 and 8 without lead-in pembrolizumab. The primary end point was pathologic downstaging (< pT2N0) with null and alternative hypothesis rates of 35% and 55%, respectively. Secondary end points were toxicity including patient-reported outcomes, complete pathologic response (pT0N0), event-free survival, and overall survival. Association of pathologic downstaging with programmed cell death ligand 1 staining was explored. RESULTS Thirty-nine patients were enrolled between June 2016 and March 2020 (72% cT2, 23% cT3, and 5% cT4a). Patients received a median of four cycles of therapy. All patients underwent RC except one who declined. Twenty-two of 39 patients (56% [95% CI, 40 to 72]) achieved < pT2N0 and 14 of 39 (36% [95% CI, 21 to 53]) achieved pT0N0. Most common adverse events (AEs) of any grade were thrombocytopenia (74%), anemia (69%), neutropenia (67%), and hypomagnesemia (67%). One patient had new-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus with ketoacidosis related to pembrolizumab and no patients required steroids for immune-related AEs. Clinicians consistently under-reported AEs when compared with patients. CONCLUSION Neoadjuvant gemcitabine and cisplatin plus pembrolizumab met its primary end point for improved pathologic downstaging and was generally safe. A global study of perioperative chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab or placebo is ongoing.

Background Pembrolizumab is approved for patients with metastatic, microsatellite instability (MSI)‐high or mismatch repair‐deficient (dMMR) solid tumors. However, very few men with prostate cancer were included in these initial studies. Methods We performed a single institution retrospective review of men with metastatic castrate‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who were treated with pembrolizumab. The primary objective was to describe the clinical efficacy of pembrolizumab associated with patient and genomic characteristics. Results We identified 48 men who received ≥1 cycle of pembrolizumab for mCRPC. Of these, 94% (45/48) had ≥3 prior lines of therapy for mCRPC. Somatic tumor sequencing was available in 18/48 men (38%). We found that 17% (8/48) had a ≥50% confirmed PSA decline with pembrolizumab, and 8% (4/48) had a ≥90% PSA decline with durations of response ranging from 3.1 to 16.3 months. Two of these four men had mutations in LRP1b , one of whom also had MSH2 loss and was MSI‐H and TMB‐high. Despite prior progression on enzalutamide, 48% (23/48) of men were treated with concurrent enzalutamide. The median PSA progression‐free‐survival was 1.8 months (range 0.4‐13.7 months), with 31% of patients remaining on pembrolizumab therapy and 54% of men remain alive with a median follow‐up of 7.1 months. Conclusions In a heavily pretreated population of men with mCRPC, pembrolizumab was associated with a ≥50% PSA decline in 17% (8/48) of men, including a dramatic ≥90% PSA response in 8% (4/48), two of whom harbored pathogenic LRP1b mutations suggesting that LRP1b mutations may enrich for PD‐1 inhibitor responsiveness in prostate cancer.

No abstract

Mathematical simulations of the p53-Mdm2 feedback loop suggest that both proteins will exhibit impulsive expression characteristics in response to high cellular stress levels.