2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.12.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Prostate-specific antigen response in black and white patients treated with abiraterone acetate for metastatic castrate–resistant prostate cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
35
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Separate analyses at several VA institutions also examined the rate of PSA decline in Black versus White patients treated with abiraterone or enzalutamide, another androgen receptor pathway–targeted inhibitor. These data were similar to the above trials and showed markedly higher rates of PSA reduction to levels of at least 50% of baseline and improved overall survival in Black men [96, 97].…”
Section: Attenuating Disparities Of Prostate Cancer Treatmentsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Separate analyses at several VA institutions also examined the rate of PSA decline in Black versus White patients treated with abiraterone or enzalutamide, another androgen receptor pathway–targeted inhibitor. These data were similar to the above trials and showed markedly higher rates of PSA reduction to levels of at least 50% of baseline and improved overall survival in Black men [96, 97].…”
Section: Attenuating Disparities Of Prostate Cancer Treatmentsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…A number of previous studies in Japanese patients with CRPC have also revealed a shorter PFS and OS compared with those in phase III trials ( 20 22 ). It has been reported that the differences in androgen receptor signaling between men of African and Caucasian descent accounts for the differences in the percentage of patients responding to AA, using the decline in PSA level as a marker of responsiveness, although there were no significant differences in PFS or OS ( 13 ). Similarly, it may be that the response in Japanese patients may also differ.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is notable interest in confirming whether the efficacy of AA demonstrated in trial settings is reproducible in routine clinical practice, given the potential differences in the selection of patients, ethnic differences and other factors in day-to-day practice. AA is effective for DTX-naïve and post-DTX treated patients with CRPC, yet the efficacy of AA varies substantially between individuals ( 13 ). In addition, there is cross-resistance among DTX, AA and ENZ (a second-generation anti-androgen), and the sequence in which these drugs are administered to the patient affects the efficacy of treatment ( 14 , 15 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been concern that use of ART drugs in clinical practice is continued too long and given that these drugs are expensive and are used by a large number of men with mCRPC, this could have large financial implications. A wide range in time on treatment for these drugs has been reported in previous observational studies, ranging from 3 to 20 months (S1 Table) [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…treatment for ART with a range from 3 up to more than 20 months, likely due to differences in study design, study population, and definition of drug stop [13][14][15][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Plos Onementioning
confidence: 99%