The purpose of this study was to directly (head-to-head) compare the per-lesion diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) (also referred to as CT hereafter) and gadoxetic acid disodium (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (also referred to as MRI hereafter) for the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Studies reporting direct per-lesion comparison data of contrast-enhanced multidetector CT and Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging that were published between January 2000 and January 2015 were analyzed. The data of each study were extracted. Systematic review, paired meta-analysis, and subgroup analysis were performed. Twelve studies including 627 patients and 793 HCC lesions were analyzed. The sensitivity estimates of MRI and CT were, respectively, 0.86 (95% CI 0.76–0.93) and 0.70 (95% CI 0.58–0.80), with significant difference (P < 0.05). The sensitivity estimates were both 0.94 (95% CI 0.92–0.96) (Chi-square 4.84, degrees of freedom = 1, P > 0.05). In all subgroups, Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging was more sensitive than multidetector CT for the detection of HCC, and specificity estimates of both tests maintained at a similarly high level in all conditions: sensitivity estimates of both tests were reduced in studies where patients were diagnosed with HCC solely by liver explant or in those where HCC lesions were small (≤2 cm, especially when ≤1 cm). But in all situations, sensitivities of MRI were higher than those of CT with or without significance. Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging showed better per-lesion diagnostic performance than multidetector CT for the diagnosis of HCC in patients with cirrhosis and in small hepatic lesions.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00261-016-0807-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Background End-of-life care decision-making has become important to support dignity and quality of life for patients who are facing death in Korea, along with the enactment of the Life-Sustaining Treatment Act in 2018. However, it seems that the concepts and policies related to the law are not yet familiar to health care providers or the general public. This unfamiliarity can hinder efficient end-of-life care discussions. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to propose a valid and reliable tool to explore the level of understanding of concepts and attributes related to end-of-life care decisions. Methods This is a mixed-methods study design. A relevant law and literature analysis, expert consultation, cognitive interviews of 10 adults, and cross-sectional survey for psychometric tests using data from 238 clinical nurses were performed to update a tool developed before the life-sustaining treatment Act was enacted in Korea. Results 29 items of the draft version were polished in terms of literacy, total length, and scoring method via cognitive interviews and finalized into 21 items through psychometric tests and expert consultations. The 21 items conformed to the Rasch unidimensional paramenters. Conclusion A tool to identify the level of understanding of concepts related to end-of-life care decisions was proposed through a rather rigorous process to ensure feasibility and validity/reliability. We recommend the proposed tool to apply to the adult population and nurses for evaluation and educational purposes.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate Korean advance directives (K-AD) by examining the degree of adults' acceptance and reliability of the directive itself. Methods: Survey was performed with 181 adults aged 20 or older who were recruited from three regions. A questionnaire used to examine the participants' acceptance of their K-AD in terms of visual analogue scale score of complexity, difficulty, necessity, satisfaction, recommendation. Then, a retest was carried out by asking participants to write up a K-AD again to confirm the reliability of the directives. Results: On a scale of 100, the average acceptance score was 70 or above, which represents rather high level of acceptance in all five categories. The test-retest reliability kappa values ranged from 0.592 to 0.950, and the conformity degree was moderate or high. Regarding K-AD components such as values, treatment preference, proxy appointment, differences among age groups were observed in each component. Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that K-AD is a feasible instrument to analyze its acceptability and reliability for adult population. K-AD could be utilized to help people make their own decision on their end-of-life care. Further studies are needed to confirm this study results and promote widespread use of K-AD.
Purpose: The aim of this study was to examine the validity and reliability of the Korean version of the PTSD scale (K-PTSD) for measuring attitudes and knowledge of PTSD. Methods: A cross-sectional study design was used. The K-PTSD scale consisted of 8 items for attitudes, 8 items for general knowledge of PTSD, and 3 items for knowledge of PTSD treatment; 211 nursing students and paramedic students participated. Content validity, item analysis, and factor analysis were used to examine the construct validity. Criterion validity was tested by using educational experience with PTSD as a criterion. Cronbach's α was used to identify internal consistency reliability in the attitude scale. Results: Construct validity of the K-PTSD was verified by exploratory factor analysis, with factor loadings for attitude ranging from .59 to .84. Criterion validity in comparing knowledge of PTSD (t=2.02, p=.044) and PTSD treatment (t=3.19, p=.022) showed a significant difference according to PTSD educational experience. Cronbach's α for the attitude scale was .79 and .59. Conclusion: The findings suggest that the K-PTSD is a valid and reliable tool that can measure attitudes and knowledge of PTSD among nursing and paramedic students. However, further study is needed to retest the verification of this scale with more diverse participants.
Few studies assessing professional opinions regarding facilitators and barriers to use of advance directives (ADs) in Korea have been reported. The aims of this study were to (1) identify facilitators and barriers to use of ADs and (2) evaluate their importance in clinical practice. To address the aims of the study, a panel of experts in end-of-life care was invited and their opinions regarding facilitators and barriers to use of ADs were solicited using a semistructured survey (round 1). The relative importance of facilitators and barriers that emerged from the survey was evaluated on a 10-point Likert scale (round 2). Forty experts participated in round 1; 38% of them completed round 2. Five facilitators were identified with regard to knowledge, legal system, patient-provider paradigm shift, public and professional education, and cultural understanding. Seven barriers emerged, including negative attitudes, lack of a legal system, Korean Confucian belief, limited support, professional incompetence, and advances in medical therapy. Knowledge and negative attitudes were the most important facilitator and barrier for successful implementation of ADs, respectively. In conclusion, public and professional education is believed to be critical to increasing knowledge and enhancing positive attitudes toward ADs and professional competence in end-of-life care. A legal model of ADs that is compatible with Korean culture is also needed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.