Segmental fusion is not necessarily needed in treatment of thoracolumbar unstable burst fracture requiring surgery. Our objective was to report the results of follow-up for at least 10 years in patients with thoracolumbar unstable burst fracture requiring surgery in which fractured segment was healed following temporary posterior instrumentation without fusion, and in whom implants were subsequently removed.
Retrospective Cohort Study.
Nineteen patients in whom union of fractured vertebra was observed following surgery and in whom implants were removed within an average 12.2 months, and who could be followed up for at least 10 years, were enrolled.
At the last follow-up, we evaluated the segmental motions, anterior body height ratio, progress of further kyphotic deformity, Oswestry Disability Index, Rolland Morris Disability Questionnaire and Short Form 36.
Results: The follow-up period after implant removal surgery was 151 months on average. The local kyphotic angle was 26.89 ± 6.08 degrees at the time of injury and 10.11 ± 2.22 degrees at the last follow-up. The anterior body height ratio was 0.54 ± 0.16 at the time of injury and 0.89 ± 0.05 at the last follow-up. Thus, the fractured vertebra was significantly reduced after surgery and maintained till last follow-up. The segmental motion was 9.84 ± 3.03, Oswestry Disability Index was 7.95 ± 7.38, Rolland Morris Disability Questionnaire was 2.17 ± 2.67, short form 36 Physical Component Score was 77.50 ± 16.61, and short form 36 Mental Component Score was 79.21 ± 13.32 at last follow-up.
We conducted at least 10-year follow-up and found that temporary posterior instrumentation without fusion should be considered one of the useful alternative treatments for thoracolumbar unstable burst fracture in place of the traditional posterior instrumentation and fusion.
Object: Lumbar Fusion is a successful operative possibility to treat lumbar degenerative diseases. The literature describes fusion rates of 90%. This study investigated the rates of lumbar fusion in two different segments in the lower spine.Methods: This retrospective study included patients who were treated by transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) from 2009-2012 in the orthopaedic and trauma surgery at St. Marienkrankenhaus hospital in Ludwigshafen. The fusion rate of 48 Segments and the correlation between fusion und segment were radiographically examined. The clinical outcome was measured from 39 patients by VAS and ODI and was compared with the fusion rate.Results: The fusion rate in L3/4 was 33,3% and in L4/5 15,2%. There was no correlation between fusion and segment. The clinical evaluation showed an average improvement in VAS of 4,5. The ODI showed an average improvement of 31,1%. There was a significant difference between preoperative VAS and ODI to follow-up. The clinical outcome compared to the fusion showed no significant deviation.
Conclusion:This study didn't find a difference between the fusion rates in L3/4 or L4/5. The pseudarthrosis rate was very high, but good clinical outcomes could be observed so it seems that stable pseudarthrosis after lumbar fusion is sufficient to reduce pain.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.