BackgroundThis study was to evaluate the association of lumbar spine facet joint osteoarthritis (LSFJOA) identified by multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) with age and low back pain (LBP) in an adult community-based population in Korea.MethodsA sample of 472 participants (age range, 20 to 84 years) who underwent MDCT imaging for abdominal or urological lesions, not for chief complaints of LBP, were included in this study. LSFJOA based on MDCT findings was characterized using four grades of osteoarthritis of the facet joints. The prevalence of LSFJOA according to age group (below 40 years, 40-49 years, 50-59 years, 60-69 years, and above 70 years), gender, and spinal level was analyzed using chi-square tests and the association between LBP and LSFJOA adjusting for age, gender, and spine level was analyzed using multiple binary logistic regression test.ResultsEighty-three study subjects (17.58%) had LSFJOA (grade ≥ 2). The prevalence of LSFJOA was not associated with gender (p = 0.092). The prevalence of LSFJOA increased with age (p = 0.015). The highest prevalence of LSFJOA was observed at L4-5 in men (p = 0.001) and at L5-S1 in women (p = 0.003), and at L5-S1 in the overall population (p = 0.000). LSFJOA was not associated with LBP in men (p = 0.093) but was associated with LBP in women (p = 0.003), especially at L3-4 (p = 0.018) and L5-S1 (p = 0.026).ConclusionsThe prevalence of LSFJOA based on the computed tomography imaging was 17.58% in the adult community Korean population. The prevalence of LSFJOA increased with age, and the highest prevalence was noted at L5-S1. LSFJOA was not associated with LBP at any spinal level and age except at L3-4 and L5-S1 in women.

Background Conventional posterior open lumbar surgery is associated with considerable trauma to the paraspinal muscles. Severe damage to the paraspinal muscles could cause low back pain (LBP), resulting in poor functional outcomes. Thus, several studies have proposed numerous surgical techniques that can minimize damage to the paraspinal muscles, particularly unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression. The purpose of this study is to compare the degree of postoperative LBP, functional outcome, and quality of life of patients between bilateral decompression via unilateral laminotomy (BDUL; group U) and conventional laminectomy (CL; group C). Methods Of 87 patients who underwent diagnostic and decompression surgery, 50 patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria and were followed up for > 2 years were enrolled. The patients were asked to record their visual analog scale pain score after 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. BDUL was used for group U, whereas CL was used for group C. The patients were randomly divided based on one of the two techniques, and they were followed up for over 2 years. Functional outcomes were assessed by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), and SF-36. Results Operation time was significantly shorter in group U than in group C ( p = 0.003). At 6, 12, and 24 months, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of spine-related pain (all p > 0.05). Functional outcomes using ODI and RMDQ and quality of life using SF-36 were not significantly different between the groups (all p > 0.05). Conclusions Regarding single-level decompression for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis, group U had the advantages of shorter operation time than group C, but not in terms of back pain, functional outcome, and quality of life.

In thoracolumbar and lumbar unstable burst fracture, performing posterior instrumentation without fusion and removing the instrument after bone union is achieved is considered a useful procedure for selected patients.

Background: Until now, few studies had investigated the neuropathic pain component in patients with a rotator cuff tear (RCT). Objectives: The aim of the study was to identify the neuropathic pain component in patients with RCT and to determine the factors correlated with neuropathic pain in patients with RCT. Study Design: Prospective, cohort, prognostic study. Setting: Study patients who required arthroscopic rotator cuff repair were analyzed in a hospital setting. Methods: We prospectively studied 101 patients who were less than 60 years old with fullthickness tears requiring arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Multiple regression analysis was performed to identify variables that independently affected neuropathic pain in patients with a RCT. We use Douleur neuropathique 4 questionnaire (DN4) to assess neuropathic pain, which was ≥ 4 points of the DN4 questionaire. The visual analog scale (VAS) for the most severe pain within 4 weeks before admission and mean pain level during the last 4 weeks were checked. The atrophy grades of the rotator cuff muscles were classified on magnetic resonance images according to the Goutallier classification. The size and medial retraction of the RCT were measured during arthroscopic repair for RCT. Results: Sixteen (15.8%) of the 101 patients had neuropathic pain according to the cutoff values on the DN4 questionnaire for diagnosing neuropathic pain. The neuropathic pain group had significantly higher prevalence of smoking (P = 0.042), more mean VAS during last 4 weeks (P = 0.008), larger cuff tear (P = 0.003), more medial retraction of cuff (P = 0.016), and severe fatty degeneration of rotator cuff muscles (supraspinatus, P < 0.001; subscapularis, P < 0.001; and infraspinatus, P = 0.003) than the nonneuropathic pain group. The multiple logistic regression analyses showed that more mean VAS during the last 4 weeks and tear size of a rotator cuff were independent of other factors for the neuropathic pain of the patients with a full-thickness RCT. Limitations: Small sample size is the first limitation of this study. Conclusions: The prevalence of neuropathic pain in patients with a full-thickness RCT requiring arthroscopic rotator cuff repair was 15.8 % according to the DN4 questionnaire. The neuropathic pain component was more relevant to the severity of pain and tear size in the patients with a full-thickness RCT. It is important to be aware of the existence of neuropathic pain when treating a patient presenting with pain due to a RCT because accompanying neuropathy with a RCT could have a worse effect on repair of a RCT. IRB approval and clinical trial registration number: CR-15-045 Key words: Shoulder, rotator cuff tear, arthroscopic rotator cuff repair, neuropathic pain

Segmental fusion is not necessarily needed in treatment of thoracolumbar unstable burst fracture requiring surgery. Our objective was to report the results of follow-up for at least 10 years in patients with thoracolumbar unstable burst fracture requiring surgery in which fractured segment was healed following temporary posterior instrumentation without fusion, and in whom implants were subsequently removed. Retrospective Cohort Study. Nineteen patients in whom union of fractured vertebra was observed following surgery and in whom implants were removed within an average 12.2 months, and who could be followed up for at least 10 years, were enrolled. At the last follow-up, we evaluated the segmental motions, anterior body height ratio, progress of further kyphotic deformity, Oswestry Disability Index, Rolland Morris Disability Questionnaire and Short Form 36. Results: The follow-up period after implant removal surgery was 151 months on average. The local kyphotic angle was 26.89 ± 6.08 degrees at the time of injury and 10.11 ± 2.22 degrees at the last follow-up. The anterior body height ratio was 0.54 ± 0.16 at the time of injury and 0.89 ± 0.05 at the last follow-up. Thus, the fractured vertebra was significantly reduced after surgery and maintained till last follow-up. The segmental motion was 9.84 ± 3.03, Oswestry Disability Index was 7.95 ± 7.38, Rolland Morris Disability Questionnaire was 2.17 ± 2.67, short form 36 Physical Component Score was 77.50 ± 16.61, and short form 36 Mental Component Score was 79.21 ± 13.32 at last follow-up. We conducted at least 10-year follow-up and found that temporary posterior instrumentation without fusion should be considered one of the useful alternative treatments for thoracolumbar unstable burst fracture in place of the traditional posterior instrumentation and fusion.

BackgroundTo determine the prevalence of spondylolysis in a selected population and evaluate the association of spondylolysis with low back pain (LBP). Spondylolysis is widespread in the general population but the prevalence of spondylolysis and its relationship with LBP in the Korean population is controversial.MethodsA sample of 855 participants (age, 20 to 86 years) from our medical center who underwent multidetector computed tomography (CT) imaging to assess abdominal and urological lesions were enrolled in this study. The occurrence of LBP requiring medication in the preceding 12 months was evaluated using a self-report questionnaire (a modified Nordic Low Back Pain Questionnaire). The presence of spondylolysis was characterized by CT imaging. Multiple logistic regression models were used to examine the association between spondylolysis and LBP, while adjusting for gender and age.ResultsSeventy-eight study subjects (9%) demonstrated spondylolysis on CT imaging. There was no significant difference between the age groups (p = 0.177). The p-value of gender was 0.033 but this was not significant due to the selected population bias. Three hundred eleven study subjects (36%) had back pain. There was a significant difference between gender (p = 0.001). No significant association was identified between spondylolysis and the occurrence of LBP.ConclusionsThe prevalence of LBP was 36.37% and the prevalence of lumbar spondylolysis in a selected population, who visited hospital for abdominal or urological lesions except LBP, was 9.12% based on CT imaging. Males demonstrated a similar presence of LBP to females but a significantly higher incidence of spondylolysis (p = 0.033). The prevalence of spondylolysis was not associated with the presence of LBP and age in adulthood.

Moderate correlation was found between ODI or RMDQ as a condition-specific outcome and the SF-36, indicating overall health status. ODI was found to be a more adequate measure to evaluate axial back pain rather than referred pain or radiating pain. RMDQ was adequate to measure the health status and to evaluate the 3 types of spine pain. These 3 instruments could therefore provide the clinician with complementary information about the patient's status.

Increasing severity of SedSign indicates progressively smaller dural sac CSA, but there is an inconsistent association with clinical symptoms. Therefore, it is reasonable to suggest that spinal stenosis is severe in patients with severe symptoms.